• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
The final 6 housemates and their winning merits?
Pro_Sniper
27-01-2014
Casey Batchelor: Biggest odds 66/1 lol she never really had a hope of winning anyway but she blew any outside chance she may have had when she went crawling back to Lee in such a desperate manner.

Sam Faiers: Biggest odds 33/1 and that's from very short odds at the beginning. She's obviously a decent girl but it'd be quite a shame if she were to win imo considering how little she's given.

Luisa Zissman: Biggest odds 18/1 and while she seems to have a turned many boos to a few cheers it's never going to be enough to see her win as she's still the sort of annoying person that could force people into voting for others to win just to make sure she doesn't On the whole I like her and thinks she's done and said as much as any to be crowned the winner. Doubt enough others see it the same way though.

Dappy: Biggest odds 17/2 and his odds have been shortening steadily from the beginning as he's getting on without really annoying the masses. Getting closer to Jim will also have done him no harm but is it possible for a lapdog to outdo his owner? I didn't expect to like Dappy when he went in but from what I've seen of him he's definitely OK in my book. So if he did manage to win I'd have no complaints as he's just about done enough to merit none.

Ollie Locke: Biggest odds 8/1 and this was from a warm favorite at one time until he was quickly(and suspiciously imo) overtaken by Jim. Like Sam he's obviously a decent kid, but again, has he really featured enough to be crowned the winner? Definitely not for me.

Jim Davidson: Biggest odds 1/3 LOL and this is obviously from big outside prices when the show began. I have a theory that it's been fixed from the outset for Jim to win but this is just my personal opinion and I naturally respect others who think that is complete bullshit. However, love him or loathe him I don't think anyone can deny that over the full 3 weeks he's been a huge presence and a great contestant. Therefore I certainly have no gripe about him emerging as the winner. Some are saying he's playing a game and/or being totally fake but it won't be any different to almost all of the past winners of this show so I couldn't care less.

I reckon the top 3 will be as the odds suggest...

Winner: Jim (LOCKED )
Runner-up: Ollie
3rd: Dappy
freddieaxl
27-01-2014
I think the order will be: Jim, Ollie, Dappy, Sam, Luisa, Casey

I think the order SHOULD be, based on how much they have contributed to the series: Jim/Luisa, Dappy, Casey, Ollie, Sam.

Imo Ollie and Sam are liked for being totally inoffensive
thenetworkbabe
27-01-2014
Originally Posted by freddieaxl:
“I think the order will be: Jim, Ollie, Dappy, Sam, Luisa, Casey

I think the order SHOULD be, based on how much they have contributed to the series: Jim/Luisa, Dappy, Casey, Ollie, Sam.

Imo Ollie and Sam are liked for being totally inoffensive”

Ollie and Sam literally did nothing.
Casey had a bit of story, but it wasn't great
Dappy proved pretty dappy.

Jim offered home spun wisdom, hid his most dangerous views, upset assorted females, and got upset for being called old. He played a poor man's version of Jack Dee.

Luisa did a brilliant job pointing out all the issues the other HM had been put in there for. She crashed into Lionel's problem deciding if he was old and wanted to sleep, or a risque young thing at heart still. She pointed out Jim was avoiding saying what he thought - revealing just what he didn't want to reveal. She jumped on Dappy's sexist world view, and counselled Lee on his. She even dared to point out that the Emperor elect, Ollie, had no clothes or views, and was avoiding having any because some voter might not like what he picked. Problem is having hit so many nails on the head, much of the audience still won't have noticed what she's revealed, and she's got blood on her hands doing it, and fans who blame her for criticising their favourites.
Pro_Sniper
27-01-2014
Originally Posted by thenetworkbabe:
“Ollie and Sam literally did nothing.
Casey had a bit of story, but it wasn't great
Dappy proved pretty dappy.

Jim offered home spun wisdom, hid his most dangerous views, upset assorted females, and got upset for being called old. He played a poor man's version of Jack Dee.

Luisa did a brilliant job pointing out all the issues the other HM had been put in there for. She crashed into Lionel's problem deciding if he was old and wanted to sleep, or a risque young thing at heart still. She pointed out Jim was avoiding saying what he thought - revealing just what he didn't want to reveal. She jumped on Dappy's sexist world view, and counselled Lee on his. She even dared to point out that the Emperor elect, Ollie, had no clothes or views, and was avoiding having any because some voter might not like what he picked. Problem is having hit so many nails on the head, much of the audience still won't have noticed what she's revealed, and she's got blood on her hands doing it, and fans who blame her for criticising their favourites.”

Nice post, thenetworkbabe Too bad you're outnumbered 1/1000
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map