Originally Posted by C14E:
“I'm not sure why people get so wound up and offended about the idea of a default audience. Maybe that's not the right term. But we surely all accept that different channels would get different audiences for the same programmes. Nearly any given show on Nat Geo would rate better on Channel 5 which would rate better on Channel 4 which would would rate better on Itv which would rate better on BBC1...”
Different thing, though, isn't it? It would depend on the show and the audience's expectations of the channel. I would expect an entertainment show or a drama to rate well on ITV because they have a strong reputation.
What gets me is the suggestion that BBC1 in some way has an unfair advantage because of this so-called "default" audience, it's blaming the audience for being too thick to watch anything else. If people choose to watch BBC1, how is that possibly BBC1's fault? They're not tricking them into watching it. It's not even the case that tellies go straight to BBC1 when you switch them on anymore! So you get situations where BBC1 had that good Sunday night last week with the Boat Race and there were mealy-mouthed comments that BBC1 in some way didn't deserve it and that ITV were in a hopeless situation.
And Countryfile is a good programme, let's not forget what a risk it was to put it in primetime in the first place. Up until 2009 it was on at eleven o'clock in the morning and it could have completely flopped when they moved it to primetime. It certainly wasn't an easy option. And there are plenty examples of programmes which were big hitters but declined, the endless discussion about 'stEnders is a good example. If Countryfile gets in rubbish presenters and has a really crap relaunch, the ratiings will go down. Viewers aren't being brainwashed.
That's the thing that most annoys me here, suggesting viewers are stupid.
Originally Posted by Philip Wilson:
“Though I do agree that the chance of a Saturday drama is nil at the minute.”
Not least because Casualty is on BBC1.