Originally Posted by SamuelW:
“This is yet another example of cost-cutting in drama at the broadcaster. Instead of a big 6 or 8 episode new drama, they've resorted more and more this year to these small 2 or 3 part shows.”
That doesn't make any sense, if ITV were trying to cut costs and save cash they'd demand that all their dramas were potential long-runners and at least six parts to justify the cost of setting them up. There's more to the cost of a show than the number of hours it fills up, long-running dramas are in terms of cost per hour substantially cheaper. And ITV have always done one-off dramas and mini-series and always will.
Originally Posted by Wozza20:
“Looks like the sort of biographical drama BBC4 has been producing lately.”
Well, BBC4 didn't invent the biopic, ITV have done plenty over the years. I remember they did a drama about Pat Phoenix about fifteen years ago, and one of the most watched programmes of the last decade was their 2000 drama Seeing Red with Sarah Lancashire as Coral Atkins. The based-on-a-true-story thing we're getting here is a staple of drama going back decades. The Cilla story has obvious appeal in terms of nostalgia.
Originally Posted by yorkie100:
“20:30 - The National Lottery: Who Dares Wins: 5.49m (25.4%)
21:00 - True Grit: 1.76m (8.7%)
19:20 - Splash!: 3.89m (17.2%)
20:50 - Take Me Out: 3.34m (15.7%)
22:05 - The Jonathan Ross Show: 2.63m (14.3%)”
Thought True Grit might have done a bit better than that, it seemed quite an appealing premiere and in a decent slot. Never mind. You would have to say that if Splash and Take Me Out perform poorly in terms of ratings (and they do), they certainly do the business in terms of demosgraphics and on Twitter on a Saturday my Twitter feed is certainly full of Take Me Out this, Splash that, even though the former is being absolutely thrashed by Who Dares Wins. That never gets the credit it deserves either, and it's certainly nothing to do with the lottery itself propping it up because the lottery on its own rates very poorly. It's a good format and a very well-made show, the kind of amiable quiz that Saturday nights have always welcomed (and Samuel may be interested to know that Secret Fortune was axed about eighteen months ago).
Not very good for Jonathan Ross given there was no Match of the Day competition, especially compared to Graham Norton 24 hours earlier, and the guests list didn't appear particularly worse.
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“Imagine how well BBC2 would be doing if Britain was doing better.”
I think all channels would be doing better if Britain was doing better, because for Britain to do much better we'd have to be undergoing some kind of ice age.
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“1.10m for Reflex last night according to Ronant. Stick a fork in it. It's done!”
That is poor, but the break didn't help, though BBC1 clearly knew it'd be flunga round from pillar to post when they scheduled it for early evening in Q1. And the gaps in the run didn't hurt Total Wipeout when that was regularly scheduled in similar slots.
Originally Posted by SamuelW:
“Also what has not helped matters is that they got rid of the Itv News 5.30am lead-in last year. This used to rate about 3 times better than what they currently air in that slot. That significantly lower lead-in is very badly damaging Daybreak's ratings particularly for its 6-6.30am period.”
Sorry, there's absolutely nothing to be gained from a lead-in at 6am, because it's 6am. If people are up at 6am they're not doing so in order to watch TV. If anything you would assume that the ending of the 5.30am news would be an advantage for Daybreak because if you'd watched the 5.30 news you didn't then need to watch Daybreak doing the exact same thing.
Originally Posted by H of De Vil:
“I suppose you could say at least they're trying, 500k is not good for Daybreak and something needs to be done. Although each re-vamp has lost more viewers. Adverts are a major problem, viewers don;t want adverts in the morning so BBC have an automatic headstart.”
When all else fails, blame the adverts. Never seemed to be a problem for GMTV or News at Ten in their pomp.