• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 58)
<<
<
98 of 337
>>
>
Fudd
01-03-2014
Originally Posted by SamuelW:
“I dont think the fact Itv had a slightly stronger 2013 [2013 was always going to be stronger than the Olympic-affected 2012] has particularly prompted BBC One to try harder so far this year. All the shows which BBC One has aired so far this year were commissioned well before Itv had a stronger year last year. I dont think New Tricks or MBB repeats are particularly lazy because at the end of the day, every channel airs repeats in prime time in order to save costs. Itv airs loads of Midsomer/Lewis repeats etc. Both these shows rate well for their repeats hence why they're repeated quite often - fans like them. In terms of complacency, I dont think the BBC would get complacent if Itv dont push them. Theres no real evidence of that having happened in the past.”

If the BBC had no competition due you think they would put so much money or effort into shows to make an impact? I think they would accept they're dominant and do the bear minimum required - it's human nature.

Originally Posted by SamuelW:
“It works both ways Fudd. Itv try and crush some of BBC's shows a lot. For example the Emmerdale clashes against Eastenders.”

I said big.

In all seriousness, it's pathetic and childish when that happens. It'd make more sense to hold them back and air them as hour long episodes on Sunday or an hour long on Wednesday night followed by Coronation Street at 8pm.

Originally Posted by SamuelW:
“Or when Itv moved BGT earlier than usual to try and damage the Voice.”

Britain's Got Talent was always going to start early in 2012 because of the Jubilee week and the BBC knew that. If they wanted The Voice to avoid Britain's Got Talent they would have scheduled it for January from the off.

Originally Posted by SamuelW:
“Or airing Downton Abbey on Christmas Day [bbc1's most important day of the year] in order to limit BBC1's ratings potential.”

I think that's more to gain some respectability than crush BBC One. Economically it would make more sense for ITV to air Downton before Christmas but that would leave a huge gap in the schedule. People take a special interest in Christmas figures so it'd be an embarrassment for ITV if they're humiliated on that day - even if they are always beaten.

Originally Posted by SamuelW:
“To play devil's advocate: Don't you think by BBC1 offering stronger opposition against IAC/DA/BGT, by your same reckoning, BBC One would encourage Itv to increase the quality of IAC/DA/BGT? Some people say DA's quality has dipped over the last few years [and that IAC has become stale], perhaps the production companies of these shwos have got a bit complacent due to lack of competition from BBC1?”

Can't argue with that but I think BBC One have been trying against Downton at least with highly promoted dramas. They did try to do something about Britain's Got Talent by scheduling The Voice against it. I'm A Celebrity is slightly more difficult as it's stripped but I see no harm in trying dramas and comedies against it as long as they're aware that it might backfire. I'm not sure like for like would necessarily work (eg. Last Tango v Downton); it'd just look petty. As petty as Emmerdale v EastEnders anyway.
Glenn A
01-03-2014
Originally Posted by lewiep93:
“God help us all if Samuel ever became Director General of the BBC.”

No, he'll infiltrate ITV instead, cancel all their high ratings series so the BBC has no competition at certain times, and then watch them go bankrupt.
Fudd
01-03-2014
Originally Posted by iaindb:
“BBC1 is no stronger this January/February than it was last year.

Midwife, Death In Paradise and Silent Witness were all on last year as were new series of sitcom smash-hits Mrs Brown's Boy and Miranda plus the successful natural history series Africa. The only area were BBC1 had been stronger this winter is Saturday thanks to The Voice.”

But they seem to have more hits to come as well - last year BBC One had a strong start and faded a bit. There doesn't seem to be that risk this time around.
cylon6
01-03-2014
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“ I fell into the trap - mea culpa.



It is but I have the feeling the big storyline of the year is going to help the show out; it's shrouded in mystery and involves an iconic character so I can see it being given a boost. The problem with EastEnders last year is nothing of note really happened. In comparison, wasn't the Tyrone/Kirsty abuse storyline being aired across this period in Coronation Street?”

Many thought the return of Stacey would give EastEnders a boost and that hasn't happened yet. They will have to trail Lucy Beale's death episode but it's an unremarkable character so I don't know if we will see a big increase.
SamuelW
01-03-2014
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“If the BBC had no competition due you think they would put so much money or effort into shows to make an impact? I think they would accept they're dominant and do the bear minimum required - it's human nature.”

It's difficult to say, I suppose it is human nature. But there is a fixed amount of money which the BBC are guaranteed, so they would have to spend that money on continuing to make programs. And the intention of tv channels generally is to make programs as good as possible [no one goes out to make a crap program intentionally]. I could be wrong, but I think the effort and ambition would still be there.

Quote:
“Britain's Got Talent was always going to start early in 2012 because of the Jubilee week and the BBC knew that. If they wanted The Voice to avoid Britain's Got Talent they would have scheduled it for January from the off.”

BGT did get moved one week earlier than originally intended. And Itv moved BGT from its 8pm slot to about 7pm to clash vs the Voice. Itv could've left BGT post 8pm.
Glenn A
01-03-2014
ITV did come close to finishing off the BBC in the late fifties, when ITV was taking 75 per cent of the ratings in areas that had access to ITV. ITV was actually giving viewers what they wanted, and was actually very good, while the BBC seemed reluctant to move on from a very middle class schedule which even BBC Four wouldn't try now.
johnnymc
01-03-2014
A good rating from "Jonathon Creek" last night. Not what I would have gone with in terms of scheduling it as I think three episodes following "The Voice" would have been a good combination.

"EastEnders" managed over 7 and a half million with the inclusion of the repeat from BBC three. Pretty consistant showings from it each week.

And itv had good news this week with one of it most profitable years in 2013. Graham Norton being one of programmes made in itv studios that helped them gain an almost 30% rise, while the show does well in the ratings on BBC one. Proof that both commercial and public funded channels can happily help each other in the competitive world of tv and would not be half as strong without one another.
Agent F
01-03-2014
Originally Posted by welshfoxy:
“Never gonna happen - he actually cares about the BBC!”

Well, he cares about BBC One. Don't think he's too fond of the "niche" stuff they chuck on the minority channels.
yorkie100
01-03-2014
What are you lot all doing on here anyway - I thought it was compulsory to watch The Voice and/or Takeaway!!
xeo
01-03-2014
Originally Posted by yorkie100:
“What are you lot all doing on here anyway - I thought it was compulsory to watch The Voice and/or Takeaway!! ”



I have both recorded - the ads in Takeaway were a bit much last week. Not sure if I'll ever get round to catching up with The Voice though. Might just watch the live shows/final.
Glenn A
01-03-2014
I think for all they show some complete rubbish, BBC One still tries hard and has some popular and good programmes. They've never gone down the route of showing tbnoxious shows like Jeremy Kyle or had stripped reality shows like the commercial sector.
yorkie100
01-03-2014
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“But they seem to have more hits to come as well - last year BBC One had a strong start and faded a bit. There doesn't seem to be that risk this time around.”

There will come a time though. I agree though that there seems to be more about BBC schedule this year while ITV have suffered from some underperformers like DOI and Selfridge and some big flops. If they had not had BOAF/Benidorm it would have been close to meltdown for them. As usual they seem to be waiting to play the BGT card and it always performs for them.
JCR
01-03-2014
Originally Posted by yorkie100:
“What are you lot all doing on here anyway - I thought it was compulsory to watch The Voice and/or Takeaway!! ”

Waiting for Stew Lee at 2200 on BBC2, a time slot where he doesn't have to compete with actual entertainment.
AnthonyC
01-03-2014
Enjoying TVUK tonight given we've entered the less impressive battle round phase but god, how long is the show going on for? Even die-hard fans must be looking at their watches

Predicting 'peak' figure will be the key metric tweeted tomorrow morn...
Agent F
01-03-2014
I'm not sure what the public have done to be inflicted with two hours and ten minutes of The Voice. Good grief.
johnnymc
01-03-2014
Originally Posted by AnthonyC:
“Enjoying TVUK tonight given we've entered the less impressive battle round phase but god, how long is the show tonight? Even die-hard fans must be looking at their watches

Predicting 'peak' figure will be the key metric tweeted tomorrow morn...”

Couldn't "The Voice" be split! Phew! Bit too much battling maybe?

Better to have punchy two halves I would say. Saturday and Sunday or something in between two seperate hours of the battle rounds maybe on the one night?.
Brekkie
01-03-2014
Originally Posted by welshfoxy:
“Never gonna happen - he actually cares about the BBC!”

Like Putin cares about Ukraine.

P.S. Can I propose the BBC show The Voice all day every day. It's in the interests of this thread.
iaindb
01-03-2014
Originally Posted by JCR:
“Waiting for Stew Lee at 2200 on BBC2, a time slot where he doesn't have to compete with actual entertainment.”

Jonathan Ross Show isn't entertainment?

To be honest, if Lee's show was suitable for screening at 7.30pm I don't imagine there would be much audience overlap with The Voice and Takeaway.

It's a considerably better slot than series 2 which went out on a weeknight after Newsnight at 11.20pm. That didn't show a lot of faith in the product. There are new people at BBC2 now. Plus all the 11.20pm programmes now are repeats. Maybe they don't have any cash for new shows in that slot., not even one like Stewart Lee's show which much have a pretty low budget.
SamuelW
01-03-2014
Originally Posted by Agent F:
“I'm not sure what the public have done to be inflicted with two hours and ten minutes of The Voice. Good grief.”

Let's wait and see the breakdown tomorrow. I bet the second hour rates better than the first, which will vindicate the BBC's decision to have a 2hr10min runtime.
pdwill
01-03-2014
[quote=SamuelW;71566757]It's difficult to say, I suppose it is human nature. But there is a fixed amount of money which the BBC are guaranteed, so they would have to spend that money on continuing to make programs. And the intention of tv channels generally is to make programs as good as possible [no one goes out to make a crap program intentionally]. I could be wrong, but I think the effort and ambition would still be there.

Samuel, the biggest problem with your grand plan for the collapse of ITV is the fact that we're living in 2014 and not 1974. If ITV were blown out of the market by the BBC do you not think that SKY or other broadcasters would benefit more from this and that the impact on the BBC's market share would be minimal? ITV's most popular shows would surely just transfer to other commercial broadcasters who would use these as a platform from which to fill the void left by ITV (I'm sure Channel 5 in a world without ITV would love to have Emmerdale or X Factor, SKY would happily take Corrie and Ant & Dec, etc, etc...). Arguably, if this were to ever happen it could ultimately weaken the BBC in the longer-term by resulting in the audience becoming more fragmented more quickly?
Ice dragon1
01-03-2014
Enjoyed the Voice tonight some good battles and some not good ones but enjoyable none the less.
newkid30
01-03-2014
Originally Posted by Ice dragon1:
“Enjoyed the Voice tonight some good battles and some not good ones but enjoyable none the less.”

First time I've watched this season, apart for first episode, I loved the battle rounds, it was long but very entertaining IMO, will def watch again next week. I like the judges interaction a lot.
Ice dragon1
01-03-2014
Originally Posted by newkid30:
“First time I've watched this season, apart for first episode, I loved the battle rounds, it was long but very entertaining IMO, will def watch again next week. I like the judges interaction a lot. ”

Glad you enjoyed it newkid shame you missed most the blinds as there the bits I love the most,
H of De Vil
01-03-2014
Careful don't praise TVUK too quickly, wait 10 minutes or so before praising it after its finished.

Only joking
Chris1964
01-03-2014
Originally Posted by johnnymc:
“Couldn't "The Voice" be split! Phew! Bit too much battling maybe?

Better to have punchy two halves I would say. Saturday and Sunday or something in between two seperate hours of the battle rounds maybe on the one night?.”

That's what they did before I think-Saturday and Sunday. What was good about tonight was the fact that all four coaches were involved-last time there were two coaches per show with their acts.
It was long but just about watchable for all that time.
<<
<
98 of 337
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map