Originally Posted by Tiger Rose:
“I know it's the Daily Star but...they are quoting Suzanne directly which does lend it more credibility. If it was friends of Suzanne or show insiders I'd be cynical.
Let's wait & see if Suzanne denies this.”
I don't see a problem. The DS article repeats the argument made by every judge this week. Its pretty much true. Suzanne knows more about skating than two judges and more about performance than all 4, so she's perfectly qualified to say what she thinks. If she's been asked the question she either says nothing or the truth. She's hardly unique either. Kyran questioned whether skill mattered on the show the same night - and noted it was silly to have Suzanne in the skate off when she was doing the more difficult work. There's only one contestant who has been labelled as having too few skills - Nicky even implied she should be in the skate off, while Karen said she wasn't doing enough. When it came to duel week, Ray also doesn't raise any question about who is his closest female contender is - he came out with a pretty accurate assessment of Suzanne's strengths - which suggests he has looked at the alternatives as contender to him too.
If the whole DS story has any basis in fact, its interesting for two other reasons
Firstly, it raises the question whether Suzanne was asked about anyone else - if not, the question is designed for a pre decided purpose. If yes, it would be interesting to know how she assesses the rest of the competition. If that was asked, and answered, it should have been published too, as it changes the context.
Secondly , it directly confirms the suspicion that some raised on here - that the team challenge was shaped by Hayley's ability. The boys, you could add, was shaped by Ray's lifting ability , but coped with that by letting Kyran and Sam do something extra in their lifts, and by letting Ray do his own big trick to keep the overall level up. Its interesting when speculation on here actually turns out to be true.