Originally Posted by td1983:
“And I'M the "complaint police" in this equation? Oh, the irony....
Ok, so we've cleared up that you weren't just phoning them to complain about that, but maybe if you'd mentioned that in the first place, then I wouldn't've posted what I did. And my own posts are not trivial, I just thought that anyone who actually phoned them about it rather than a simpler email was crossing the line in terms of pedantry. Admittedly, I kind of realised what you said after I'd posted it, but I thought I'd wait to see if you fell into the oh-so-predictable DS trap of checking through a poster's previous posts to prove your point. You fell right into it. Equally hilarious!”
Tedious. You will be picked up on contradictory statements if that means going back to quote your posts - if you contradict yourself then you'll be picked up on it - simple. What part of that don't you understand in the setting of a debate/discussion and as part of DS forum? It happens in plenty of other threads.
Whether I used the phone or emailed them is a minor point - you seem to judge someone by the means of communication they use! FYI the process was email - matters unresolved - they phoned me, but your rude assertion that I need to sort out my priorities is frankly none of your business. So when the debate veers into rudeness I no longer discuss. End of conversation with you and no more replies to you on the matter.