Originally Posted by doctor blue box:
“Could it not be that past poll's have come out that way because the majority voted for new who episodes and doctors overall because they genuinely thought they were the best overall on those particular polls, and nothing to do with being old or new had anything to do with it?.
I sometimes wonder at the point of having polls for overall favourite episode/doctor at all if every time an episode/doctor from classic who win's we are all supposed to accept this as genuine and offer our congrat's to the winning doctor, yet whenever an episode/doctor from new who wins, the win is diminished and belittled by people saying thing's along the lines of 'oh, it's just because its newer' or 'must have been young people bombarding the vote that day' etc. It's as though some people are convinced that no part of new who could ever be equal or better than classic who and if anything from new who is voted top in polls concerning the whole show, then that poll must have somehow been tainted or biased. To my mind, looking at it from an objective point of view, regardless of what I like/dislike myself, I would say classic who and new who rank about equal in terms of quality overall, and being such, people should believe a result that rank's something in new who as top as much as they would believe it if a classic who element was voted top.”
Much as I agree with you on this last point, I'm afraid there is no such thing as an accurate cross section or poll. Unless every single person who votes on the above has seen every single story it can't be regarded as accurate,
even if a Classic Story wins, because not everyone will have seen every Classic Who story.
Before you jump back down my throat, I would like to offer the opposite view in that this Poll could be considered unbalanced as it has more Classic Stories in it than New Ones and if I was a New Series Fan only I could be tempted to post that that gives the Classic Series stories a 7-4 chance of winning and the odds are stacked in it's favour. However, since at the moment a Matt Smith story is winning, I say I rest my case. Recent episodes do well in best story polls, recent Doctors do well in best Doctor Polls and the same with the companions and so forth.
All I was saying is that the recent trend on most polls is that when Classic Series is pitted against New Series it seemingly always loses as a lot of people haven't watched the Classic Series. It isn't about what I think is best, even what you think is best, it's a general observation from previous polls.
Just for the record, though it seems I always defend Classic Who, it doesn't mean I hate the New Series, though the last few years haven't been so good imo. I just sometimes feel the need to point out certain perceptions aren't true and that's why I constantly highlight it where I can. At the end of the day there shouldn't be a distinction, it's the same series but the labelling of the old show as Classic sometimes does it no favours.