Originally Posted by daveyboy7472:
“Very interesting point, it is a hard one with Pertwee. As only one of two Doctors during the 70's, he was eclipsed by Tom Baker so unless you're a fan of his Doctor/Era it's sort of hard to remember him for anything.
Though I'm not a big fan of his Doctor, you have to give credit to him for helping revitalise the show in the early 70's, but is that enough to make him stand out and be remembered?
”
“Very interesting point, it is a hard one with Pertwee. As only one of two Doctors during the 70's, he was eclipsed by Tom Baker so unless you're a fan of his Doctor/Era it's sort of hard to remember him for anything.
Though I'm not a big fan of his Doctor, you have to give credit to him for helping revitalise the show in the early 70's, but is that enough to make him stand out and be remembered?
”
I think that the Doctors tend to go through phases of popularity. And maybe that is something that will become more pronounced in future too.
Pertwee was considered one of the most popular Doctors at one time, a golden era even. Recently he does seem to have gone out of vogue amongst fandom ( I spcifically say fandom for reasons I'll get into later) somewhat. On the other hand Troughton's stock seems to have risen, maybe becuase of high-profile endorsement from people like Matt Smith and buzz from recovered episodes, which people have become increasingly aware of the last few years. Certainly, the issue of missing episodes was something only fairly hardcore fans were aware of until quite recently.
Similarly, Peter Davison's Doctor seemed to get a real shot in the arm from Moffat's endorsement and appearance in 'Time Crash'. Big Finish productions have done a lot to 'rehabilitate' Colin Baker's Doctor.
I think there's also the strong possibility of over and under-estimating the popularity of certain Doctors by taking Internet chatter as the only indicator. In fact, there's a particular demographic that will use the internet a lot more than others (16 - 30ish) and so 'their' era will appear to receive much more favour. Whereas not too long ago that would have been the 70s (Pertwee and Tom) it is now 80s, hence the apparent decline in popularity of Pertwee and the increase for Davison. In fact, Pertwee will still have his old fans, they're just not talking so much on the Internet.
I got a big lesson about this kind of thing when I was stunned to discover that my brother-in law was a big fan of Doctor Who, in particular Tom Baker's era. I had absolutely no idea he had any interest at all but he had a lot of Baker-era DVDS and a very good knowledge, even of the stories i consider more obscure. He likes other eras too but it was the 4th Doctors that he really loved. But he is by no means a 'fan' in the normal sense; he doesn't particularly talk about doctor Who ( although I discovered it's a frequent point of reminisce for him and his brother) and certainly he's not following the show online, but his love for that era is true and valid and unchanging. But it wouldn't register on any sort of fan-opinion Richter scale. I'm sure there are many similar cases. This is why it irked me when you would hear certain people say the public wouldn't be interested in seeing old Doctors for the anniversary or would have forgotten who they were. The exact opposite is true in my opinion. There were probably a lot of people who would have liked to see more Pertwee but they're not Blogging or Tweeting about it or writing in to Doctor Who magazine.



