Originally Posted by daveyboy7472:
“For me, The Master is a cold, calculating villain hell bent on Universal Destrbuction. In Classic Who Delgado played him with as a calm, but charming villain, his interpretation was not at all 'moustache twirling' as you call it.
Peter Pratt and Geoffrey Beevers played him with less charm but still played him calm and menacing.
Anthony Ainley started off this way too. Logopolis is my fave Master story as it showed him being cold, clinical and duplitious, everything a Master should be. After that it did go downhill, there were some panto moments until Survival when Ainley was back to his serious best.
Eric Roberts did a good job in the TV Movie until the last third then he just went OTT.
Derek Jacobi took the character back to the Delgado days and made him cold and clinical again.
John Simn, great actor, superb in Life On Mars but seriously disagree he was a great Master.
He lacked the charm and clinical deviousness of previous Master's and for me he was the one with the 'moustache twirling' attitude. He played the role like some big kid and I personally dislike it. Everyone to their own, but Simn wasn't a patch on the previous Masters and for me there was very little complexity in his portrayal. I do think Simn is a good actor but The Master wasn't for him.”
The Delgado version was not insane. The 'Skeletor', degenerated version understandably did seem to have been driven so. Since then no-one seems to have been able to make up their mind how he should be. Ainley's version was really an attempt to duplicate Delgado's interpretation, at least initially, and was certainly rational, albeit exaggeratedly villainous. Eric Roberts, I don't really know what was going on there. I think the actor more or less did what he liked and hammed it up simply because he thought that was the form thing to do with the character, which was probably true after Ainley.
With Simm's version I think it was a deliberate choice by the writer, RTD, that he should be insane. We even got the flashing skull type effect to remind us he was that self-same degenreated Master that Peter Pratt and Geoffrey Beevers played. Narratively, I can accept this: after his experiences in that emaciated form I can quite accept the loss of his sanity and that he was no longer the same calm, totally rational persona we saw Delgado play.
In terms of personal taste though I don't care for Simm's portrayal at all. Neither do I really think that a totally unhinged Master is as interesting a foil for the Doctor as Delgado's calculated, rational one. If there is indeed to be a new version at any point I hope they give him his marbles back. Maybe he can get a new regeneration cycle like the Doctor, so that that desperate part of his persona can be buried again.
To be honest, as he was a recurring villain it was always a little silly they used up his regenerations in the first place, so had to then keep coming up with spurious ways for him to change form, which really was a lot of needless work. That said, Robert Homes and Phillip Hinchcliffe were never interested in endlessly bringing back the old guard and were unlikely to have cared much for the character's longevity beyond 'The Deadly Assassin'.
Personally, I don't really find the Master interesting post 'Deadly Assassin', and honestly can't say I've found any of the subsequent storylines with him to be very good. I do love Delgado's version, who was so perfect as a foil for the 3rd Doctor, but I've no interest in seeing the character again unless there's a really good story there and something to do with the character beyond bringing him back in disguise with some crazy mastermind scheme.