• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Vanessa shows off new 34c boobs in this weeks zoo
<<
<
1 of 6
>>
>
cheeks
22-02-2005
Vanessa (hands strategically placed) displays her new 34c boobs in this weeks zoo magazine. Looking at them I'd say they're very similar in size to Shell.
There's no new revelations from Vanessa, she just talks about her new boobs in the interview coming out with gems such as they're great,people keep fondling them etc.........
Iknowicould
22-02-2005
Who are the people that "keep fondling them"?

Have they never seen balloned breasts before?

At last, Ness is back in the news, her profile just above flatline with her chest modification.

What next for the archer in the show? More flesh selling with Shell in lads magazines obviously.
Trashcan
22-02-2005
Classy bird that one.. It's hard to wonder why Fogle discarded her..
Iknowicould
22-02-2005
Her boobs were too small then?

Now? Shaazam!!
Scots rool
22-02-2005
Originally Posted by cheeks:
“Vanessa (hands strategically placed) displays her new 34c boobs in this weeks zoo magazine. Looking at them I'd say they're very similar in size to Shell.
There's no new revelations from Vanessa, she just talks about her new boobs in the interview coming out with gems such as they're great,people keep fondling them etc......... ”

Does she really think people care I'm quite sure if people came up to her & started 'fondling' her, methinks she would be a bit hacked off. Weirdo
cheeks
22-02-2005
my opinion of Vanessa though has changed for the better. She seems to be more down to earth than she appeared on BB and she seems to have developed more of a sense of humour.I'm off out now as I'm expecting a bit of a backlash from this comment!
Trashcan
22-02-2005
Originally Posted by cheeks:
“my opinion of Vanessa though has changed for the better. She seems to be more down to earth than she appeared on BB and she seems to have developed more of a sense of humour.I'm off out now as I'm expecting a bit of a backlash from this comment!”

You mean you like her new breasts..?

This is the same woman who derided one M. bass for expressing her wish for a career in glamour modelling - theres irony in there somewhere.
Omah
22-02-2005
Originally Posted by Trashcan:
“This is the same woman who derided one M. bass for expressing her wish for a career in glamour modelling - theres irony in there somewhere.”

Exactly .... hypocritical tart .... just like Shell .....
Iknowicould
22-02-2005
Originally Posted by Trashcan:
“You mean you like her new breasts..?

This is the same woman who derided one M. bass for expressing her wish for a career in glamour modelling - theres irony in there somewhere.”

No. None at all.

However, there is desperation.

And cash. Lots of moolah, as her best friend Shell has doubtlessly showed her.
cheeks
22-02-2005
Originally Posted by Trashcan:
“You mean you like her new breasts..?

This is the same woman who derided one M. bass for expressing her wish for a career in glamour modelling - theres irony in there somewhere.”

Not that arsed about the breasts to be honest. As Michelle's no 1 fan you have a point about the hypocrisy but let's not forget that Michelle was saved by the OK magazine money tree as soon as she left the BB house. Could've been a different story altogether.....
chrisdebag
22-02-2005
michelle has always been honest and in fact kept her clothes on
cheeks
22-02-2005
Originally Posted by Iknowicould:
“No. None at all.

However, there is desperation.

And cash. Lots of moolah, as her best friend Shell has doubtlessly showed her.”

you're right about the cash. There's more photo shoots to come.......
Scots rool
22-02-2005
Originally Posted by cheeks:
“my opinion of Vanessa though has changed for the better. She seems to be more down to earth than she appeared on BB and she seems to have developed more of a sense of humour.I'm off out now as I'm expecting a bit of a backlash from this comment!”

Yeah right, tell the truth, you're off to find Vainessa for a quick grope are you not
cheeks
22-02-2005
Originally Posted by Scots rool:
“Yeah right, tell the truth, you're off to find Vainessa for a quick grope are you not ”

I thought you had to be famous to qualify for that privilege!
lulu g
22-02-2005
Originally Posted by chrisdebag:
“ michelle has always been honest and in fact kept her clothes on”

But she has not always kept her clothes on, has she? I seem to remember her getting her baps out at the drop of a flip-flop. The eve of nomination day tended to prompt Michelle to suggest a bit of topless mud-wrestling, as I recall.
Bibbles
22-02-2005
Originally Posted by chrisdebag:
“ michelle has always been honest and in fact kept her clothes on”

Michelle stated she would do glamour to the public on the show(and maybe to the producers)and has so far not done so.

How can that be honest?.Is it not the opposite of honest?
ie dishonest.

surely no different to saying you won't do glamour and then doing glamour.
Omah
22-02-2005
Originally Posted by Bibbles:
“Michelle stated she would do glamour to the public on the show(and maybe to the producers)and has so far not done so.

How can that be honest?.Is it not the opposite of honest?
ie dishonest.

surely no different to saying you won't do glamour and then doing glamour.”

So far, Michelle's earning more money by keeping her clothes on - now she didn't say she would keep her clothes on, so is that dishonest ? That is, she's doing things that previously she did not express an opinion about, whereas S & V specifically said on the show that they wouldn't consider taking their clothes off for money and now, of course, are - that's the difference .....
Bibbles
22-02-2005
Originally Posted by Omah:
“So far, Michelle's earning more money by keeping her clothes on - now she didn't say she would keep her clothes on, so is that dishonest ? That is, she's doing things that previously she did not express an opinion about, whereas S & V specifically said on the show that they wouldn't consider taking their clothes off for money and now, of course, are - that's the difference ..... ”

I thought Michelle said she wanted to do glamour and it was her ambition.
(i may be wrong as i read that from other posters)
Omah
22-02-2005
Originally Posted by Bibbles:
“I thought Michelle said she wanted to do glamour and it was her ambition.
(i may be wrong as i read that from other posters)”

Prior to the end of BB5, Michelle did indeed openly aspire to "glamour modelling" but after she and Stuart were evicted, she was offered far more money to stay clothed - should she have therefore taken less money for taking her clothes off on principle ?
Matallica
22-02-2005
Ah come on any pics thats the main thing!
Bibbles
22-02-2005
Prior to the end of BB5, XXXXX did indeed openly aspire to a contract with OK magazine but after she was evicted, she was offered far more money to do glamour modelling - should she have therefore taken less money for not taking her clothes off on principle ?

taking clothes off/not taking clothes off isn't it the honesty factor-more than what they do?


Perhaps the issue is whether people think a little bit of glamour modelling (soft porn maybe) is anything wrong in this day and age.Apart from a few old pensioners I wouldn't think there are many people that think that way now are there?
Trashcan
22-02-2005
Originally Posted by cheeks:
“Not that arsed about the breasts to be honest. As Michelle's no 1 fan you have a point about the hypocrisy but let's not forget that Michelle was saved by the OK magazine money tree as soon as she left the BB house. Could've been a different story altogether.....”


Michelle is one of the most talked about housemates cos she's real [hence the OK deal] - Vanessa and Shell are cardboard and need gimmicks to get their 'faces' on teenage w*nk mags..


Michelles No1 fan/
Trashcan
22-02-2005
Originally Posted by Iknowicould:
“No. None at all.

However, there is desperation.

And cash. Lots of moolah, as her best friend Shell has doubtlessly showed her.”

Yes, it's ironic they're now the desperate ones.
Omah
22-02-2005
Originally Posted by Bibbles:
“Prior to the end of BB5, XXXXX did indeed openly aspire to a contract with OK magazine but after she was evicted, she was offered far more money to do glamour modelling - should she have therefore taken less money for not taking her clothes off on principle ? ”

By whom ?????
anna123
22-02-2005
how did this thread turn into another discussion on michelle! Anyways people can change there mind maybe she has decided she doesnt want to glamour modelling anymore.

Good look to Vanessa.... shes had a boob job big deal, its not like shes commited some sort of crime!
She's also apparently gonna be appearing on a African version of Strictly come dancing http://icsurreyonline.icnetwork.co.u...name_page.html
<<
<
1 of 6
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map