look not really bothered if she has a husband and kids just think people should have proof before posting the rubbish she posted in the post above and especially in the vindictive way in which it was posted as though it was fact when in reality she has no proof of what she posted.

yeah sorry about that got slightly carried away..

sorry michelle was nether a lier, sorry what do you mean about michelle " changing her mind in ok""

I don't care what you think, Michelle used sex to get Stuart to be her boyfriend, that was on BB for all to see, she then came out of BB and they sold their story to OK. In my eyes this is far worse than anything Shell or Vanessa did, either in the house or out, I am allowed my opinion. I am not a bitter old spinster, Michelle has nothing that makes my jealous of her. I am not being vindictive just stating what I saw.

look we all feel safe been able to post the posts we do knowing that the people reading them don't know who we are, but surely there has to be a limit to what people can actually put in their posts,

posts like the one yellowlabbie posted is crossing a line of decency as far as i am concerned. to be able to post like that has got to be going beyond the rules of any messageboard and if it is not then surely that messageboard should re-evaluate their rules.

where i come from people are heavily into sport and just recently a messageboard was closed down due to people posting things that couldn't be proven because the club running it was sued for libel,
just because one poster thinks like that dosn't mean you cannot post these things without proof if the people you are saying these things decide to take exception to what you post about them not only yourself but the messageboard your posting on can find themselves being sued.

what i am trying to say but going a long way about it is we all like posting on here but isn't it time that people where told when they are crossing the line because if it keeps happening one day someone is going to object to the things being said about them and this messageboard will be held accountable for what you post and who's to say it wont be closed??

yellowlabbie you may not care about what i think but would your answer hold up in a court of law when your being sued for libel.

yes you are allowed an opinion but at least an opinion on reality not what you think and to state that she has always got her own way through sex is pushing the what ever you say way past the point of decency and is entering the area when you then have to have real evidence not just what you think!!

Your post surprises me to some extent.

Maybe you have not been observant enough to note that many threads are closed and removed by the mods whenever they feel the need to as a result of the threads' contents in their opinion.

There has been a number of administrative edits (as they term it) in some threads where certain words/sentences have been removed by the mods instead of closing the whole thread.

If you have a problem with a post/thread, hit the alert button and complain and I am sure the mods would appreciate your concerns.

That way, you would feel better.

how often though does this happen and don't get me wrong i believe in freedom of speech but i also believe in common decency, and accusing someone of the things yellowlabbie has is going way past just just saying what you think and as i asked her prove what she has stated and so far the only thing she has done is state she dosn't care what i think kind of proves my point that she hasn't got any evidence.

Not quite sure what relevance Kate Lawler has to this thread.

But, in reply to your comments, Kate said in the house she would rather do a FHM photo-shoot, than Loaded. Kate was wrong. FHM shoots/interviews tend to be far more intrusive. Loaded & Front actually ask questions about peoples' lives. That's not to say Kate hasn't been offered the chance to do FHM shoot, because she has.

I assume you have never criticised Kate for doing photo-shoots. If you have, but have not criticised Shell & Vanessa, you have contradicted yourself.

I have based my posts on what I have seen on BB5 and after, I have read a lot of post being derogatory about Shell and Vanessa, is this not slanderous, or does it does apply to posters who criticise Michelle? Michelle fans always throw the slander word at you when you criticise her.

look yellowlabbie have re-read your post and have one question you may be able to answer,
when trying to start a realationship with someone don't we all use sex to try and get a girlfriend/boyfriend ???

I would also say that calling another forum member a 'bitter old spinster' is also being very vindictive considering you don't know me, and also frowned upon on this forum.

so the following is based on what you so on bb5 :-
She makes her way through life getting everything she wants using Sex,

Maybe, but on National television, and I have never acted in the same way as Michelle, she all but stalked Stuart in the beginning.

think you'll find someone else posted that I haven't actually called you anything!!

sorry but michelle has never sold her sex story to no one, so i don't know why you keep saying michelle sold her sex story ?

ever heard of editing and did michelle not while in the bedsit think she should of given stuart more space???
does it really matter where you are when you find yourself attracted to someone. and look seven months after bb5 finished and they are still together and from articles i've read stuarts as admitted that they don't like being apart for to long ( that's stuart saying that not michelle)...

sorry we still don't know if they had full sex under the table. So what any way her and stu are madly in love, so good luck to them. all the stars sale there storys not just michelle and stuart

"allegedly".

That's the word we're looking for.

Such as "Michelle's a right tart. Allegedly".

I apologise, I posted my reply too quickly.

Still doesn't make it right sian1980 and by the way they are not stars.

sorry i watch bb live 24/7 and editing on michelle was c**** because they whated nadia to win and they want jason and nadia the last two( good tv)

don't think anyone do actually think of them as stars!

I watched a lot of BB5 live and, fair enough, they couldn't show everybody all of the time but everything Michelle did was sex orientated, mud-wrestling, jacuzzi's with Stuart, getting into his bed every night trying it on when he obviously didn't want to, she only stopped when she thought he would dump her. Did I imagine all this?

I didn't say michelle and stu were stars, i said stars all sell their storys.