|
||||||||
Sgt Alexander Blackman |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 2,456
|
Quote:
This argument that those of us who haven't served in the military are in no position to judge infuriates the hell out of me.
It's like when people say that unless you're a woman you're not allowed a view on abortion. This is a liberal democracy. Those with particular expertise or experience of certain things should certainly be listened to, but in the end the decision on whether certain behaviour is permitted in our society is one for us all to make. Blackman should be grateful for his far too lenient sentence. Hes unfortunate with his sentence in mine |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: in yo' mamma
Posts: 19,358
|
As with the first thread on this - before THIS one gets bent out pof shape too much, there's a link on the Wiki entry for Sgt Blackman that takes you to the very clearly-written and concise Judge's summation. It explains in great but very understandable detail exactly what Blackman did and how it was wrong on many levels, and it ALSO explains the various reasons why Blackman received ten years instead of the normal thirty.
It's probably so well-written, clear and concise BECAUSE this was always going to be a controversial case with many ramifications in civil society AND the military. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 47
|
As you may know #AlexanderBlackman lost his appeal. Quite rightly in my view, these soldiers are not above the law. There is an online campaign by an ex marine named John Davies, whose support seems to be coming from far right fascists and racists. Thankfully the campaign is proving fruitless and this convicted murderer is going nowhere for 7 1/2 years.
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern East Anglia
Posts: 75,207
|
Quote:
The guy should've got a bloody medal, not a prison sentence.
That's murder in my book, and he was lucky to only get 10 years. Even if the man was (apparently) dying anyway, he should still not have done what he did. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 47
|
Quote:
He killed a seriously injured unarmed man.
That's murder in my book, and he was lucky to only get 10 years. Even if the man was (apparently) dying anyway, he should still not have done what he did. |
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Taedet animam meam vitae
Posts: 40,368
|
Quote:
...on camera.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 5,971
|
Quote:
As with the first thread on this - before THIS one gets bent out pof shape too much, there's a link on the Wiki entry for Sgt Blackman that takes you to the very clearly-written and concise Judge's summation. It explains in great but very understandable detail exactly what Blackman did and how it was wrong on many levels, and it ALSO explains the various reasons why Blackman received ten years instead of the normal thirty.
It's probably so well-written, clear and concise BECAUSE this was always going to be a controversial case with many ramifications in civil society AND the military. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,143
|
Quote:
This raises a good point. We weren't at the trial, we didn't hear all the evidence, so how can we judge?
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 5,971
|
Quote:
Because we are people capable of forming general opinions on an event without necessarily having to know every minute detail concerning it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: blazes of hell and damnation
Posts: 7,158
|
Quote:
He killed a seriously injured unarmed man.
That's murder in my book, and he was lucky to only get 10 years. Even if the man was (apparently) dying anyway, he should still not have done what he did. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,143
|
Quote:
General opinions, yes. But enough to be able to say what punishment he should get, no.
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,194
|
I agree he was lucky to get 10 years and he's no different to any other common murderer , just because he is I'm the army . However I don't think his family should have been identified.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 6,318
|
Quote:
I agree he was lucky to get 10 years and he's no different to any other common murderer , just because he is I'm the army . However I don't think his family should have been identified.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 5,971
|
Quote:
Well when the entire issue with the public seems to be whether he should face punishment at all...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,234
|
Quote:
...on camera.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern East Anglia
Posts: 75,207
|
Sorry to bump this old thread, but this guy is hoping his sentence of ten years for murdering an Afghan insurgent, subsequently reduced to 8 years, will be quashed and that ahead of that, he will be granted bail. Whilst I appreciate the pressure soldiers may be under on the battle front, I don't buy his bollocks about believing the guy was dead, as you'd check. Also he admitted to his mates that what he'd done broke the Geneva convention. I hope he loses, because I don't believe his excuses. I think he knew exactly what he was doing. Sorry it's a Sun link, but it's the most recent one I can find Quote:
He shot the insurgent, who had been seriously injured in an attack by an Apache helicopter, in the chest at close range with a 9mm pistol before quoting a phrase from Shakespeare as the man convulsed and died in front of him. Bit in bold is true. Heard it this morning on BBC news - captured on helmet cam.
Blackman told him: ”There you are. Shuffle off this mortal coil, you c***. It’s nothing you wouldn’t do to us.” He then turned to comrades and said: ”Obviously this doesn’t go anywhere, fellas. I just broke the Geneva Convention.” The shooting was captured on a camera mounted on the helmet of another Royal Marine. Two junior colleagues were cleared of murder. During his trial, Blackman – who was known at that stage as Marine A – said he believed the victim was already dead and he was taking out his anger on a corpse |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 9,312
|
It's hard to see what he could appeal on, no one disputes he shot the victim.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 12,985
|
Why does need to be bailed to appeal the case? I feel it's a bit off that even if his appeal is unsuccessful, there's a good chance he will have been able to spend Christmas with his family.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,929
|
There are a lot of old murderers in England, Scotland. Wales who are getting nervous about being held to account for what they did in Northern Iteland
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 5,898
|
Anybody know on what basis he is appealing?
I've heard his solicitor indicating that he might try to play the PTSD card, but that would still be manslaughter surely? And elsewhere I've seen some of his supporters state that he will try and get his conviction overturned on the basis that his victim was already dead when he shot him and you can't murder a dead person. |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 619
|
Quote:
There are a lot of old murderers in England, Scotland. Wales who are getting nervous about being held to account for what they did in Northern Iteland
A couple of Paras are to face trial in N Ireland over the shooting dead of an IRA man years ago Soldiers are not social workers, they are trained to kill and nobody should be surprised if they do Where will this end, any survivors of WW2 getting prosecuted. War is war, and people get killed. In Balckmans case this unarmed mans hew shot was a Taliban fighter, no innocent |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern East Anglia
Posts: 75,207
|
Quote:
Anybody know on what basis he is appealing?
I've heard his solicitor indicating that he might try to play the PTSD card, but that would still be manslaughter surely? And elsewhere I've seen some of his supporters state that he will try and get his conviction overturned on the basis that his victim was already dead when he shot him and you can't murder a dead person. Quote:
When the fresh appeal is heard, judges will be asked to consider a number of issues, including new expert evidence acquired by the CCRC relating to the soldier’s mental state at the time of the offence.
They will also consider the fact that an alternative verdict of unlawful act manslaughter was not available to the court martial board when it considered the case. Major General Holmes, who was director of all UK special forces, has offered a £50,000 guarantee for Sgt Blackman’s bail application lodged at the weekend. He said: “I have supported Sgt Blackman’s cause since the outset. “I am more than happy to help stand his bail so he can be reunited with his family.” The new appeal will not be heard until the summer or next autumn and will consider whether he is guilty of “diminished responsibility”. |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,764
|
This thread was started by DS Forum Member "Woodbush"
Nobody ever knew what happened to him, but it is believed he might be, sadly, no longer with us. Woodbush, we miss you! |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Southern East Anglia
Posts: 75,207
|
Quote:
A couple of Paras are to face trial in N Ireland over the shooting dead of an IRA man years ago
Soldiers are not social workers, they are trained to kill and nobody should be surprised if they do Where will this end, any survivors of WW2 getting prosecuted. War is war, and people get killed. In Balckmans case this unarmed mans hew shot was a Taliban fighter, no innocent You may have heard of it at some point. Quote:
The Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols are at the core of international humanitarian law, the body of international law that regulates the conduct of armed conflict and seeks to limit its effects. They specifically protect people who are not taking part in the hostilities (civilians, health workers and aid workers) and those who are no longer participating in the hostilities, such as wounded, sick and shipwrecked soldiers and prisoners of war. The Conventions and their Protocols call for measures to be taken to prevent or put an end to all breaches. They contain stringent rules to deal with what are known as "grave breaches". Those responsible for grave breaches must be sought, tried or extradited, whatever nationality they may hold.
You don't shoot dead injured enemy soldiers who are at your mercy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: By the Skeleton Tree.
Posts: 56,602
|
Quote:
It begins and ends with the Geneva Convention 1949
You may have heard of it at some point. You don't shoot dead injured enemy soldiers who are at your mercy. Now, I can't honestly say the stresses of war wouldn't mean I wouldn't end up doing the same thing... which is why I'd make a terrible soldier (well, among other reasons, but you get my point). And if I did? Yeah, I'd deserve to face justice. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:45.




