|
||||||||
Trivial things that annoy you about TV |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,340
|
Shows such as coach trip that are only on for 29 minutes spend 4 minutes showing clips of the show we saw yesterday then they show us what's coming up after the break and after the break they show us a reminder of what we just saw 4 minutes ago
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,796
|
Quote:
Shows such as coach trip that are only on for 29 minutes spend 4 minutes showing clips of the show we saw yesterday then they show us what's coming up after the break and after the break they show us a reminder of what we just saw 4 minutes ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,171
|
Quote:
People on quiz shows who say they know the answer, and then tell us what it isn't before telling us what it is.
"Well I know it's not Tin because my Mum uses tin foil, and it's not Chile because I went there last year, so my answer is B. Cantaloupe." |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 517
|
Quote:
The seemingly increased volume inbetween programs.
Another annoying thing is EPG's giving away something that isn't revealed in a programme until near the end. To give a made up example 'Poirot wonders why John Smith has turned up at the manor house until he discovers Smith is really the long lost brother of the lord of the manor' Another one is where you are waiting to see the name of one of the cast in the end credits but when the credits roll they shrink to a small window and a preview of the next programme fills most of the screen. I was also going to say Russell Brand on Match of the Day but the title of the thread says 'trivial' and not 'criminal'. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,490
|
Scripted banter makes my toes curl.
Ant and Dec are the worst for this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 362
|
Quote:
People on quiz shows who say they know the answer, and then tell us what it isn't before telling us what it is.
"Well I know it's not Tin because my Mum uses tin foil, and it's not Chile because I went there last year, so my answer is B. Cantaloupe." Also... Announcers reading out people's meaningless tweets about a show. I really don't know why they do this apart from trying to show how popular the show is. Who does it benefit to know that someone I've never met or heard of is 'Laughing so much right now'? Good for them. If I were interested in them, I'd already be following them. Reality shows that edit in fake reactions. So someone makes a statement and they then edit in footage of everyone else just sitting looking at them and not saying anything to make it look like everyone thinks they are an idiot. However, the footage always looks like it's taken from when they were sitting quietly and listening to the person talking rather than their reaction. Reality shows (mostly happens on the US ones) where they show something 'dramatic' about to happen. Then cut to the adverts. They come back and nothing actually happened. 'Oh no - we are all going to die!' Cut to adverts Back to show 'Oh, it was nothing, we're all fine'. |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: the north
Posts: 1,389
|
Anyone on a quiz show who says "Oh that's a bit before my time"....grrrr
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,504
|
" on a mission"
I loathe this phrase. If you are a Catholic priest and the Pope orders you into the jungle to convert non-believers at huge risk to your life, then you are on a mission. If you are doing a couple of two minute interviews for a travel show, or are having a nice holiday whilst being filmed, all at the expense of the TV company, you are not on a mission. You are simply making a TV programme just like everyone else in TV. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: I'm a she not a he.
Posts: 3,192
|
The name of the next programme being flashed on screen before the programme you're watching is finished, and often at a crical moment of the action. Totally distracting and, if it's a drama, pulls you back to reality when you've been totally engrossed in what's happening on screen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,079
|
So, so many things annoy me but a few for now:
1. Wobbly, inept camera work. We shouldn't be reminded that the cameraman is there and badly needs a leak! Get a tripod and move the camera when necessary! What if the sound man kept fiddling with the volume or whatever just so we know they're on the job? It would be just as stupid. 2. Almost any music on a factual programme. Newsnight, Horizon, the history of chemistry etc. doesn't need it and is in no way enhanced by it. I can forgive it in something like a nature proagramme which is mostly visual feast with voice description, but it should not be used to induce emotion or sympathy for the subjects. 3. The 'music' which plays when some studio presenter summarises the current state of play while we see the scoreboard. Poor Sue in tennis and poor Hazel in golf can't open their mouths without some knuckledragging idiot plays us something from a royalty-free music CD intended for home videos they got in a charity shop. (Also the music played between bits of action at live sports events. When friends went to the London Olympics I wondered if I was right not to bother but having seen it on TV I'm so glad I didn't subject myself to the organisers choice of blasted noise.) 4. Seeing the presenter in a staged, if not actually scripted scene turn up, greet the person they're talking to next, shake hands and immediately launch into questions. If they'd really just met, the first few sentences would be dull pleasantries ('did you have a good journey?' etc) so why pretend they just arrived? |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: I'm a she not a he.
Posts: 3,192
|
It annoys me when programmes like Location, Location, Location announce a new series 'where we catch up with previous participants....' and it's actually just a load of repeats with a five minute update at the end of each programme.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 150
|
Quote:
Longer and longer ad breaks. ITV hours are really only about 44-45 minutes.
American half-hour shows are 19-20 minutes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 7,604
|
Quote:
Reality shows that edit in fake reactions. So someone makes a statement and they then edit in footage of everyone else just sitting looking at them and not saying anything to make it look like everyone thinks they are an idiot. However, the footage always looks like it's taken from when they were sitting quietly and listening to the person talking rather than their reaction.
Quote:
So, so many things annoy me but a few for now:
...4. Seeing the presenter in a staged, if not actually scripted scene turn up, greet the person they're talking to next, shake hands and immediately launch into questions. If they'd really just met, the first few sentences would be dull pleasantries ('did you have a good journey?' etc) so why pretend they just arrived? |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 150
|
Quote:
Too many bloody reality shows on ....
Intro/theme/preview of show 1 show 'reality' segment for 2/3 mins 2 show person who was in 'reality' segment talking about that segment 3 possibly repeat 2 with another person from segment, Repeat from 1 throughout whole show, with optional 'coming next', and 'next week' teasers. Applies to - Kardashians Storage Hunters Baggage Battles American Digger Real American Housewives etc etc All the same format. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,079
|
5. A news reporter standing in front of the thing the report is about so we can't see it and they can't either as they're looking at the camera. The stupidest instances are when say, the Queen/Pope/President goes by and they mess up in spectacular fashion by blocking our view. Sometimes they are interviewing people who waited all day to see the Queen go past and just when it happens some thoughtless moron with a mic turns up and spiols their once-in-lifetime chance to see them.
Often they or the camerman join a demo or march as though they're part of it but get in the way even standing and expecting others to go around them. They should observe, gather views and explain what's happening, not interfere with it. We don't even need to see the reporter and in some places it's better for their safety if we don't. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 126
|
Dual news readers.
Why in the name of f***, does reading a paragraph of news require a tag-team effort from a (usually male/female) duo? On BBC Breakfast they practically take alternate sentences - I mean WHY?? Is reading one story just too much for the human brain to cope with? I suspect it's only a matter of time before the duos are doing an alternate word each. Also, stringing out documentaries to an entire hour - when it could easily be covered adequately in 15-20 minutes - turns me right off. Finally, "banter" between news readers and weather men/women. It's anti-humour. And I'm sure it causes cancer. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: St Ockwell
Posts: 761
|
Music being louder than the speech
(3 of us in our house work shifts so quite often , someone is asleep) Turn the volume up to hear what's being said and then really loud music. Only trivial, I know, but still very annoying |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Up North
Posts: 58,791
|
Companies putting old adverts on instead on producing new ones.
I guess the actors in them might be happy getting their fee but also embarrassing for some who have moved up in the world having 5-10 year old ads on when they were nobodys. |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Northampton
Posts: 6,417
|
When presenters or news readers say at the end of the programme 'We'll see you again tomorrow.' They won't be seeing us, we'll be seeing them!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,445
|
Nick Knowles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 170
|
Hear hear. Him, and his terrible triphthong vowels too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,461
|
Quote:
I was watching Brush Strokes on Drama the other day and the continuity announcer was telling us what was coming next while Jacko was still talking!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,610
|
Quote:
When presenters or news readers say at the end of the programme 'We'll see you again tomorrow.' They won't be seeing us, we'll be seeing them!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,610
|
As per today's "Pointless", Richard Osman (and even worse, Alan Hansen on MOTD) referring to the "Premiership" when its name was changed back to the "Premier League" years ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Underneath Tom Hiddleston
Posts: 6,700
|
Sky Sports showing "even better in HD" below the DOG at the start of each half of a football match.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:22.



