I wouldn't pay the designer who made the logo a penny for his work. It looks dreadful. I swear I could make a better logo, and I'm not even a graphic designer.
Good Morning Britain
4 of 320
Originally Posted by davor:
“I wouldn't pay the designer who made the logo a penny for his work. It looks dreadful. I swear I could make a better logo, and I'm not even a graphic designer.”
“I wouldn't pay the designer who made the logo a penny for his work. It looks dreadful. I swear I could make a better logo, and I'm not even a graphic designer.”
It is terrible. I'm sure if I give if ago i could knock something up lol
Originally Posted by lundavra:
“As a freelancer she is unlikely to get paid holidays, she will be paid for what hours she works as in the terms of her contract.
What about all the pop singers who only perform every few weeks (or even less), and lots of actresses work less hours either by choice or lack of work.”
“As a freelancer she is unlikely to get paid holidays, she will be paid for what hours she works as in the terms of her contract.
What about all the pop singers who only perform every few weeks (or even less), and lots of actresses work less hours either by choice or lack of work.”
Bet she isn't on £6.30 an hour ?! Some people are lucky that they can afford to work those hours.
Originally Posted by davor:
“I wouldn't pay the designer who made the logo a penny for his work. It looks dreadful. I swear I could make a better logo, and I'm not even a graphic designer.”
“I wouldn't pay the designer who made the logo a penny for his work. It looks dreadful. I swear I could make a better logo, and I'm not even a graphic designer.”
That is one lazy logo. Looks like some cast-off from a supermarket billboard ad.
Originally Posted by mossy2103:
“Perhaps her agreed contract is that of a part-timer, and that she is contracted to work four days (similar to many other people across many business areas).”
“Perhaps her agreed contract is that of a part-timer, and that she is contracted to work four days (similar to many other people across many business areas).”
It has been reported that the Friday programme will be recorded on Thursdays so she will be seen five days a week (although presumably not during school holidays).
Originally Posted by conceptas:
“Bet she isn't on £6.30 an hour ?! Some people are lucky that they can afford to work those hours.”
“Bet she isn't on £6.30 an hour ?! Some people are lucky that they can afford to work those hours.”
Plenty of people on the creative arts work odd hours/part-time and get paid above the National Minimum Wage, as do many people across Britain.
Luck rarely comes into it.
Originally Posted by mossy2103:
“Plenty of people on the creative arts work odd hours/part-time and get paid above the National Minimum Wage, as do many people across Britain.
Luck rarely comes into it.”
“Plenty of people on the creative arts work odd hours/part-time and get paid above the National Minimum Wage, as do many people across Britain.
Luck rarely comes into it.”
Don't understand were you are coming from, she'll be well above the minimum wage, I think you'll find a great many people across Britain are on minimum wage who couldn't afford to do the hours she does. She is lucky that she can, see the connection ?, can you join the dots ?
Originally Posted by Sunny B:
“LOL yesterday Helen was presenting with Aled and Ranvir was doing the news. Today Ranvir is presenting with Aled and Helen is doing the news? Are they taking turns in each others roles before it finishes for good on Friday? And where's Lorraine?
”
“LOL yesterday Helen was presenting with Aled and Ranvir was doing the news. Today Ranvir is presenting with Aled and Helen is doing the news? Are they taking turns in each others roles before it finishes for good on Friday? And where's Lorraine?
”
So whose turn is it tomorrow.
Originally Posted by Sunny B:
“LOL yesterday Helen was presenting with Aled and Ranvir was doing the news. Today Ranvir is presenting with Aled and Helen is doing the news? Are they taking turns in each others roles before it finishes for good on Friday? And where's Lorraine?”
“LOL yesterday Helen was presenting with Aled and Ranvir was doing the news. Today Ranvir is presenting with Aled and Helen is doing the news? Are they taking turns in each others roles before it finishes for good on Friday? And where's Lorraine?
”
Ranvir will be presenting on Fridays
If the programme is going to be more serious and news-based why are people like Andi Peters, Richard Arnold and the camp bloke in LA appearing on it ? ITV never learn do they.
Originally Posted by ftv:
“If the programme is going to be more serious and news-based why are people like Andi Peters, Richard Arnold and the camp bloke in LA appearing on it ? ITV never learn do they.”
“If the programme is going to be more serious and news-based why are people like Andi Peters, Richard Arnold and the camp bloke in LA appearing on it ? ITV never learn do they.”
Because even BBC Breakfast do showbiz/celebrity items so they are keeping people they already employ to do such items
Originally Posted by boksbox:
“Ranvir will be presenting on Fridays”
“Ranvir will be presenting on Fridays”
Presenting what on Fridays? I thought Charlotte Hawkins would be presenting on Fridays
How about a sweepstake, when will Susanna mention " Breakfast" ie and later on Breakfast , rather than GMB,
Date/ time to 5 mins.
Date/ time to 5 mins.
So the logo looks like it's been made by the same people that put out the old Daybrook and GMTV toot - is this the start of another 'revamp' that actually doesn't change a thing other than dragging in a Sky/BBC News name or three?
Originally Posted by Ben_Hunt:
“So the logo looks like it's been made by the same people that put out the old Daybrook and GMTV toot - is this the start of another 'revamp' that actually doesn't change a thing other than dragging in a Sky/BBC News name or three?”
“So the logo looks like it's been made by the same people that put out the old Daybrook and GMTV toot - is this the start of another 'revamp' that actually doesn't change a thing other than dragging in a Sky/BBC News name or three?”
Agree,
Reboot rather than revamp, To use a Morecambe and Wise line.
I am playing all the right notes just maybe not in the right order.
So as it was before, but just in a different order..
You can change the wrapper of a book very easy, but changing the content, if any is harder.
I won't be going back as I'm mainly happy with Sunrise now, but Reid and Shepard wouldn't be on my list anyway. SR certainly isn't helping things when she talks about how although she never met BS before but they have "great chemistry" - that's not for you to decide, love.
In all honesty, I liked the pre-Chiles era. At 6.30 I don't want a parade of human misery putting a downer on my day. The giggling ineptitude and gossip Daybreak provided was the ideal way to ease into consciousness. If something major had happened, then I could switch to Sky or BBC.
In all honesty, I liked the pre-Chiles era. At 6.30 I don't want a parade of human misery putting a downer on my day. The giggling ineptitude and gossip Daybreak provided was the ideal way to ease into consciousness. If something major had happened, then I could switch to Sky or BBC.
Originally Posted by Ben_Hunt:
“So the logo looks like it's been made by the same people that put out the old Daybrook and GMTV toot - is this the start of another 'revamp' that actually doesn't change a thing other than dragging in a Sky/BBC News name or three?”
“So the logo looks like it's been made by the same people that put out the old Daybrook and GMTV toot - is this the start of another 'revamp' that actually doesn't change a thing other than dragging in a Sky/BBC News name or three?”
When Daybreak started they went with an unusual purple logo, and everyone hated it.
Therefore it is compulsory that all Breakfast programmes must be either red, orange or yellow.
Originally Posted by ftv:
“If the programme is going to be more serious and news-based why are people like Andi Peters, Richard Arnold and the camp bloke in LA appearing on it ? ITV never learn do they.”
“If the programme is going to be more serious and news-based why are people like Andi Peters, Richard Arnold and the camp bloke in LA appearing on it ? ITV never learn do they.”
Exactly. The bosses think viewers only care about the main presenters. Wrong. I watch sunrise cos the pundits are far less annoying than on itv. Expect the same weather girl, showbiz reporters, location reporters, competitions, guests... The only thing that's new is 3 of the presenters, the studio decor and the name.
So no, they don't learn.
Paxman will be jealous.................
Is your partner's snoring driving you crazy?
Does he or she keep you awake all night? Does it affect your relationship and quality of life?
If so, please contact us and we might ask you to appear on TV on Monday 28th April.
http://www.itv.com/daybreak/is-your-...ving-you-crazy
Is your partner's snoring driving you crazy?
Does he or she keep you awake all night? Does it affect your relationship and quality of life?
If so, please contact us and we might ask you to appear on TV on Monday 28th April.
http://www.itv.com/daybreak/is-your-...ving-you-crazy
Originally Posted by ftv:
“If the programme is going to be more serious and news-based why are people like Andi Peters, Richard Arnold and the camp bloke in LA appearing on it ? ITV never learn do they.”
“If the programme is going to be more serious and news-based why are people like Andi Peters, Richard Arnold and the camp bloke in LA appearing on it ? ITV never learn do they.”
ITV are doing exactly the same mistake again - carrying over the rot to the new show.
Every itv daytime programme is morphing into "This Morning", I bet they have a "Hub" where they constantly ask us to Facebook or Tweet our inane thoughts.
Originally Posted by chunky_Monkey1:
“You guys criticising it are so judgemental
it has not even started yet. give it a chance”
“You guys criticising it are so judgemental
it has not even started yet. give it a chance”
Spoil sport!
4 of 320
