|
||||||||
02 v Vodafone coverage |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Norwich
Posts: 1,317
|
Just one more thing for clarification. The sharing is of masts, sites and equipment but NOT signal?? Is that right?
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 427
|
Quote:
Just one more thing for clarification. The sharing is of masts, sites and equipment but NOT signal?? Is that right?
Project Beacon outside London: One set of sites, carrying equipment managed by one operator (the east/west split) but broadcasting coverage for both networks. O2 & VF then maintain independent networks and spectrum allocation, but are using the same grid of sites. (London a slightly different setup). There is no national roaming between the two. MBNL is very similar, where EE/3 are sharing a national grid of sites but maintain separate networks otherwise. EE: Two networks become one - so one network code is eventually abandoned entirely, in the meantime full national roaming between the two so they are "presented" as one network. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Norwich
Posts: 1,317
|
Thanks for the clarification. It makes sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,286
|
Quote:
Sorry, I wrote that a couple of times over and I'm not entirely sure it made sense to myself at the time.
![]() What services do Network Rail provide to O2/VF? Many of Vodafone & O2's sites stand on land owned by Network Rail. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,286
|
Quote:
MBNL is very similar, where EE/3 are sharing a national grid of sites but maintain separate networks otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Leicestershire
Posts: 507
|
I have also heard that part of the reason that O2 & Vodafone have not been able to renegotiate and extend their contracts with Network rail is due to them putting out a tender process for all companies to provide a 3&4 G network along railway lines. This will be for train operating companies to use for onboard wifi and consumers to use as well so will be big boost for regular commuters.
This is also supported by reports from a friend at BT Openreach who was sent on a job to remove racking equipment from a O2 mast that was being removed as contract had expired In a railways sidings but was told to just cover the end of the fibre and not disconnect from the network as another mast would be going in there in the next 6-12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,114
|
Quote:
onboard wifi and consumers to use as well
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,286
|
Who said anything about purchase? Many operators provide it for free, including Scotland's national operator. Furthermore, a train is a perfect place to use a laptop or tablet which would require not only decent mobile signal but also tethering and ideally a charger for your handset - neither of which are always available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,860
|
I think VF and O2 are committed to shared sites so all masts will be shared in the future. Where I live EE still has its own mast with no sharing with 3 - which clearly highlights how on their agreement not all sites are being shared.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,249
|
Quote:
I think VF and O2 are committed to shared sites so all masts will be shared in the future. Where I live EE still has its own mast with no sharing with 3 - which clearly highlights how on their agreement not all sites are being shared.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,860
|
Arr this is a 2G one. So are they not upgrading 2G sites to make them 3G in the future as surly this is just an increased cost?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,249
|
Quote:
Arr this is a 2G one. So are they not upgrading 2G sites to make them 3G in the future as surly this is just an increased cost?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,860
|
Quote:
They have said they will upgrade the majority of 2G only masts to 3G/4G but some are going remain 2G only if I remember rightly. Hopefully for you the mast in question is not one of them. Not sure why they leaving some as 2G only imagine those in question will be extremely rural masts hopefully they build 4G 800MHz masts in areas where these 2G Only masts are.
It makes sense really for site sharing, however when you get the odd few masts for single operators knocking about, seems to go against the whole notion of the agreement. I guess if it means nearly full coverage for most of the UK then it has to be good for the consumer so long as price competition remains. |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the future....
Posts: 11,259
|
Quote:
They have said they will upgrade the majority of 2G only masts to 3G/4G but some are going remain 2G only if I remember rightly. Hopefully for you the mast in question is not one of them. Not sure why they leaving some as 2G only imagine those in question will be extremely rural masts hopefully they build 4G 800MHz masts in areas where these 2G Only masts are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,249
|
Quote:
Well im 1 mile outside of a major town and the local O2 mast is 1 mile up the road and is still good old GPRS. To get any signal on Vodafone best bet is to stand in the garden or at a window (you guessed it GPRS only)! Given O2s and Vodafones definition of rural appears to be anywhere outside a town or city im not holding my breath!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the future....
Posts: 11,259
|
Quote:
That was me referring to MBNL not Beacon EE/3 normally are pretty good in rural areas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,286
|
Quote:
They have said they will upgrade the majority of 2G only masts to 3G/4G but some are going remain 2G only if I remember rightly. Hopefully for you the mast in question is not one of them. Not sure why they leaving some as 2G only imagine those in question will be extremely rural masts hopefully they build 4G 800MHz masts in areas where these 2G Only masts are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,286
|
Quote:
Its such an interesting setup really and very strange how its been done. It does seem that EE / Three got the head start on all of this, but with all the different kit specs knocking about this is going to make it hard to achieve maximum economies of scale. This seems to be the opposite with O2 / VF as people report the same constant kit is being installed in vast areas of the network. This will be a slower process but could really save a fortune in the longer term.
It makes sense really for site sharing, however when you get the odd few masts for single operators knocking about, seems to go against the whole notion of the agreement. I guess if it means nearly full coverage for most of the UK then it has to be good for the consumer so long as price competition remains. It's because EE/3 have a recently refreshed and more up-to-date, consolidated 3G network without a mish-mash of different kit that it doesn't need to be upgraded again. That's why each operator is installing new kit for 4G only rather than integrated units like O2/VF. It's only because O2/VF's network share so far has not shared equipment that they have ended up now with a giant mix of different equipment - and to be fair, even without the share each operator used a pretty considerable mix of different kit and vendors on their own - which is why the Beacon refresh is pulling all of that out and replacing it with a single integrated piece of kit for 2G, 3G and 4G. Furthermore it's giving their 3G networks an extensive, and much needed upgrade in the process, which EE/3 don't need to do. While EE/3 are rolling out 4G on different kit for now, it'd be interesting to see what happens in 5-10 years time, when the current MBNL NSN 3G equipment becomes obsolete. Will they just switch it off, or will there be another round of consolidation and upgrades? In either case in that time O2/VF will have consolidated their 2G/3G/4G infrastructure into a single modular piece of kit, much like EE/3 have done with 3G now. Yet at the same time EE/3 will be left with a mish-mash of different kit and vendors on each site, much like VF/O2 are now, the exact opposite situation. Basically VF/O2 are doing what EE/3 did 5 years ago and EE/3 are doing what VF/O2 did 5 years ago...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,286
|
Quote:
Well im 1 mile outside of a major town and the local O2 mast is 1 mile up the road and is still good old GPRS. To get any signal on Vodafone best bet is to stand in the garden or at a window (you guessed it GPRS only)! Given O2s and Vodafones definition of rural appears to be anywhere outside a town or city im not holding my breath!
You can drive 4 miles out from the city bypass and still find O2/VF have upgraded all their masts to 4G while EE have none. O2 & VF have about twice as much rural coverage outside the city as EE/MBNL. EE 4G has very good coverage in the city but they seem to have defined covering the city equates to upgrading every mast within the city bypass to 4G and stopping dead, completely ignoring all masts in rural towns and villages that just metres outside the bypass. They've clearly made a business decision to not upgrade any masts outside the city (for now) and leave all surrounding rural areas on an older technology. Which ironically sounds like what you're getting on O2/VF 3G. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,114
|
Quote:
Who said anything about purchase? Many operators provide it for free, including Scotland's national operator. Furthermore, a train is a perfect place to use a laptop or tablet which would require not only decent mobile signal but also tethering and ideally a charger for your handset - neither of which are always available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,249
|
Quote:
From my experience of areas where O2 & VF have launched 4G it seems the 4G situation is the exact opposite of 3G.
You can drive 4 miles out from the city bypass and still find O2/VF have upgraded all their masts to 4G while EE have none. O2 & VF have about twice as much rural coverage outside the city as EE/MBNL. EE 4G has very good coverage in the city but they seem to have defined covering the city equates to upgrading every mast within the city bypass to 4G and stopping dead, completely ignoring all masts in rural towns and villages that just metres outside the bypass. They've clearly made a business decision to not upgrade any masts outside the city (for now) and leave all surrounding rural areas on an older technology. Which ironically sounds likes of what you're getting on O2/VF 3G. |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Midlands
Posts: 2,860
|
Interesting reading about the networks and how they work. So O2/VF are going to share kit to broadcast all their services (2g,3g,4g) which makes real sense if it can be done within budget and improving network coverage.
So are Three actually building a separate 4g network to EE or just choosing to switch on sites at a later date for their kit? Also what happens to the EE 2g only sites. IE assuming they are upgraded to offer 2g and 3g would the 3g part then see Three sharing these new mast sites? |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: This forum
Posts: 3,392
|
Quote:
There is going be a few 2G only masts left but all the 3G ones will be both EE/3 masts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,286
|
Quote:
XC charge for Wi-Fi and VT charge for Wi-Fi. I'd say the installation of more line side masts improving coverage would see a decrease in demand for train Wi-Fi.
Scotrail who offer it for free: http://www.scotrail.co.uk/free-wifi And East Coast who have it partially free (it has been totally free on and off in the past): http://www.eastcoast.co.uk/wi-fi As for line side masts improving coverage, I'd say the exact opposite, it will massively increase demand for on-train WiFi, primarily due to the fact that it'll actually be useable. |
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,286
|
Quote:
Interesting reading about the networks and how they work. So O2/VF are going to share kit to broadcast all their services (2g,3g,4g) which makes real sense if it can be done within budget and improving network coverage.
So are Three actually building a separate 4g network to EE or just choosing to switch on sites at a later date for their kit? The physical grid (masts) will be the same but the actual 4G bit comes from separate boxes attached to existing masts. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:49.




