Originally Posted by Dancc:
“You appear to have seriously misunderstood me. I was talking about substantial competition. No idea what The Voice has to do with anything.
These shows can help eachother out to an extent but it does get exaggerated on here. The bits I've seen of BGT make it look a bit tired. Can't believe for a moment that viewing figures would remain fully in tact if it was properly tested.
Still I don't begrudge its success too much because at least it's not intrinsically nasty like X Factor. But it does get talked up something chronic on here.”
I read this a lot but it makes me think about
why Britain's Got Talent isn't seen as intrinsically nasty but The X Factor is. Britain's Got Talent has all the elements to be far nastier than The X Factor can ever be with a larger quota of joke acts to be patronised, the audience sometimes resembling a baying mob and - of course - the buzzers. In comparison, joke acts are kept to a minimum with The X Factor (one, maybe two at maximum, make it to the lives), the audience are asked to be supportive of the acts no matter their 'quality' and they cannot be buzzed off mid-act. Indeed, the first couple of series (especially) of Britain's Got Talent had some horrible moments during the audition and, to a lesser extent, live show stages.
They need to look at how they managed to turn the image of Britain's Got Talent around by doing barely anything at all and try and repeat the act with The X Factor. Easier said than done but not impossible, in my opinion.