Originally Posted by Dancc:
“Winkleman is 3/1 on. Speaks volumes really. Unless the bookies are making her look a certainty so that punters lump on at ridiculous odds and get stung.”
“Winkleman is 3/1 on. Speaks volumes really. Unless the bookies are making her look a certainty so that punters lump on at ridiculous odds and get stung.”
She opened odds against - 3/1 in this link for example..........
http://www.express.co.uk/news/showbi...-Strictly-host
The betting patterns implied by that Mirror article http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/s...nowles-3423750 just don't ring true to me.
This flood of bets, this unprecedented number of bets caused Ladbrokes to close their book - yet the odds at two of Ladbrokes' bookmaking rivals were unimpacted!!
Punters with inside information only targetting one bookmaker while attractive odds are available at other companies?????? I find that very suspicious!




”
(And its absolutely a hit for Channel 4 so what do I know)