There should be no kids in soaps

Janet.

The rest need brutal, vicious exit storylines.

Emmerdale: Arthur and April are great little actors. I loved the little chap who played Leo and I was so sad when he died. I hope they find a replacement soon.
Coronation Street: I enjoy watching Craig, Amy and Dev's twins.
P.S. Why is Donna's daughter called April when her birthday is in August?

EE

Tiffany
Tommy (although he did seem to be doing a Michael type stare the other day....)
Janet

Can't really judge the twins in an episode but the promos were unbelievably cute.

ED

April
Leo

CS

Simon

There should be kids in soaps why shouldn't there be? There have always been at least one or two kids in a soap. It wouldn't be right IMO to axe Lexi unless Lola is leaving and it wouldn't be right to axe Dennis unless Sharon is leaving just like it wouldn't have been right to axe Marin Fowler unless Pauline left as well as Arthur and it wouldn't have been right to axe Peter and Lucy when they were younger like 5 or 6 or 7 ect unless Ian was going to leave and it wouldn't have been right to axe Vicki if Michelle didn't leave. It wouldn't have been right to axe Rosie, Sophie, David unless Sally or Gail were leaving Coronation Street. in the 90s. So there should be kids for continuity because kids are seen and heard everyday and what your saying is like there shouldn't be kids in real life and Eastenders is suppose to reflect real life and there are lots of kids in communities. Do you think Janet and Lexi should be in Eastenders?

Do you like Janet?