|
||||||||
3 throttling VPN traffic? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,114
|
3 throttling VPN traffic?
Hi all.
I sometimes use a VPN over my 3 3G/4G connection. I do this to avoid the BitTorrent traffic management system. (I don't download torrents, I use BTSync and that triggers the systems too because it uses the same technology.) So I maintain and operate my own VPN server to run traffic through. I find that when using a VPN pages will timeout and uploads using BTSync are slow and intermittent. Last night uploads were running at 40KB/s via the VPN. I disconnected from the VPN server and continued syncing using a direct connection at 00:01 and uploads were running at 280KB/s. Now I know that there are a whole host of factors that can affect speeds via a VPN tunnel. I used to host my VPN server at the Melbourne DC in Manchester. 3 also host some of their network gear in Manchester meaning I could traceroute from the VPN server to the 3 network in 4 or 5 hops, sub 8ms pings. So it seems the latency factor can be rulled out. The server was hooked up with a 100Mb/s dedicated port with nothing else running on it, so bandwidth't wasn't a problem. I could easily pull 40Mb/s during the day over FTP. I've tried a whole series of other VPNs and it seems all of them experience degraded performance over the 3 network. I mostly use OpenVPN setups on port 1194. Could it be that 3 is unofficially throttling VPN traffic? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 336
|
Quote:
Hi all.
I sometimes use a VPN over my 3 3G/4G connection. I do this to avoid the BitTorrent traffic management system. (I don't download torrents, I use BTSync and that triggers the systems too because it uses the same technology.) So I maintain and operate my own VPN server to run traffic through. I find that when using a VPN pages will timeout and uploads using BTSync are slow and intermittent. Last night uploads were running at 40KB/s via the VPN. I disconnected from the VPN server and continued syncing using a direct connection at 00:01 and uploads were running at 280KB/s. Now I know that there are a whole host of factors that can affect speeds via a VPN tunnel. I used to host my VPN server at the Melbourne DC in Manchester. 3 also host some of their network gear in Manchester meaning I could traceroute from the VPN server to the 3 network in 4 or 5 hops, sub 8ms pings. So it seems the latency factor can be rulled out. The server was hooked up with a 100Mb/s dedicated port with nothing else running on it, so bandwidth't wasn't a problem. I could easily pull 40Mb/s during the day over FTP. I've tried a whole series of other VPNs and it seems all of them experience degraded performance over the 3 network. I mostly use OpenVPN setups on port 1194. Could it be that 3 is unofficially throttling VPN traffic? Ash |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,641
|
I also find something goes horribly wrong when using OpenVPN (on a non-default port), so it wouldn't surprise me if they are doing something.
But then I also seem to be hitting a 20Mbit/s cap on 4G which no one else seems to experience. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,286
|
Quote:
I disconnected from the VPN server and continued syncing using a direct connection at 00:01 and uploads were running at 280KB/s.
Quote:
Could it be that 3 is unofficially throttling VPN traffic?
Many providers who throttle P2P use a whitelisting policy, anything that they do not recognize is defaulted to being treated as P2P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,114
|
Quote:
dont know if you can do this with your set up but i find port 443 seams to bypass the P2P speed restrictions
Ash Quote:
What happens if you continue using VPN after 00:01? Is it still slow or does it speed up?
Many providers who throttle P2P use a whitelisting policy, anything that they do not recognize is defaulted to being treated as P2P. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,545
|
No issues with VPN's on Three here and I have tested a lot.
I have set up my own PPTP VPN on my NAS and connected via Three externally, I only did this for testing and disabled it after. I also have to use 2 different VPN's for work and they work absolutely fine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,114
|
Quote:
No issues with VPN's on Three here and I have tested a lot.
I have set up my own PPTP VPN on my NAS and connected via Three externally, I only did this for testing and disabled it after. I also have to use 2 different VPN's for work and they work absolutely fine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,545
|
Quote:
To confirm, you connect during TrafficSense hours?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,286
|
Quote:
VPN works fine after 00:01 and before traffic sense hours. So running it on a different standard port (such as 80 or possibly 53?) could help?
If it's in TCP-SSL mode then port 443 will get around most throttles. UDP you're unlikely to get past using any port, especially if you're using a pre-shared key. PPTP while ancient, insecure and widely discouraged is still popular enough that most traffic shaping systems "recognize" it as a non-P2P protocol. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,545
|
Quote:
Possibly. Depends how your OpenVPN is set up.
If it's in TCP-SSL mode then port 443 will get around most throttles. UDP you're unlikely to get past using any port, especially if you're using a pre-shared key. PPTP while ancient, insecure and widely discouraged is still popular enough that most traffic shaping systems "recognize" it as a non-P2P protocol. ![]() I should point out that the PPTP VPN I used was on TCP port 1723, the VPN running on my Synology on my home network, but test accessing it from the mobile internet connection, no issues. I also haven't had any issues with the work Juniper VPN or another different work SSL VPN I use. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 514
|
I've definitely found this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,545
|
Quote:
I've definitely found this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 514
|
Quote:
Are you sure its just not that VPNs do slow down the connection anyway? I saw about a 30% drop in speed when connected through a VPN just because of the overhead of using a VPN and re-encrypting and encapsulating data.
On Three, after using the VPN for about half an hour, any data downloads just don't work. Websites still load, but that is it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,114
|
Quote:
100% sure thats not the reason. I am using a server in Sweden which on my broadband connection works maybe 0.2Mb/s slower than my actual connection.
On Three, after using the VPN for about half an hour, any data downloads just don't work. Websites still load, but that is it. I'm going to see if I can get this working with OpenVPN running on TCP port 80. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,286
|
Problem is DPI systems will try to match protocol information with port. So using port 80 it will expect HTTP requests, if it sees anything else, it'll probably go "He's trying to trick me so it must be P2P"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,114
|
Quote:
Problem is DPI systems will try to match protocol information with port. So using port 80 it will expect HTTP requests, if it sees anything else, it'll probably go "He's trying to trick me so it must be P2P"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,286
|
As I say, only if you're running it in SSL mode, since that's the default SSL port.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:26.


