|
||||||||
Well done Hollyoaks... |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: England.
Posts: 3,762
|
Well done Hollyoaks...
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/soaps/s1...oCGRAi2Eqe93bi
Despite mixed opinions on these forums about the show, Hollyoaks has done very well for itself in the nominations department for the soap awards. Which awards do you think the show will win? I'm hoping Dan Tetsell wins best comedy performance. Surprised Charlie Clapham is up for an award though...I like his character but he's not the strongest actor in soapland
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: HELL! ... 5th DB7
Posts: 10,041
|
Its all well and good HO getting the most votes, but all it means is voted will be split in categories they are nommed more than once sadly. So I'm not very optimistic about it.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 5,931
|
Yeah, good for Hollyoaks. I don't think it's been particularly strong recently, but good for them for getting so much recognition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester
Posts: 2,945
|
Surely you mean well done to the well-organised multiple-voting campaign that was carried out. If it was one person, one vote, they wouldn't have stood a chance.
Internet voting doesn't work, and awards organisers should take careful note. This is, clearly, an absolute travesty. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,443
|
Quote:
Its all well and good HO getting the most votes, but all it means is voted will be split in categories they are nommed more than once sadly. So I'm not very optimistic about it.
The mass phone/internet voters made an error here, they would have been better off organising themselves better to mass vote on one person only. I would be amazed if they actually won any of the categories they are nominated in. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 31,192
|
Quote:
Surely you mean well done to the well-organised multiple-voting campaign that was carried out. If it was one person, one vote, they wouldn't have stood a chance.
Internet voting doesn't work, and awards organisers should take careful note. This is, clearly, an absolute travesty. It is possible to vote more than once so what you sugggest is a posibility. No doubt these accusations will come up again if they actually do win an award |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,588
|
Well I'm glad hollyoaks has been nominated a lot and I believe they do deserve a lot of awards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,339
|
Quote:
Hollyoaks always does well in the weekly polls on here, I imagine that hollypaks fans are a lot more internet savvy than fans from the other soaps.
It is possible to vote more than once so what you sugggest is a posibility. No doubt these accusations will come up again if they actually do win an award |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,588
|
I'm glad hollyoaks have been nominated for a lot of awards and I believe they deserve a lot of awards I'm still confused about why Freddie is nominated for newcomer though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 5,931
|
Quote:
I'm glad hollyoaks have been nominated for a lot of awards and I believe they deserve a lot of awards I'm still confused about why Freddie is nominated for newcomer though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 38,853
|
Quote:
Surely you mean well done to the well-organised multiple-voting campaign that was carried out. If it was one person, one vote, they wouldn't have stood a chance.
Internet voting doesn't work, and awards organisers should take careful note. This is, clearly, an absolute travesty. Course, the voting numbers were a lot smaller then. I have a very vague memory of an early soap awards where it was announced that 50,000 votes had been cast. These days it is a bit of a joke when you can - a lot of people DO - just multi-vote endlessly. Course, whoever makes money from all these multi-votes are happy it happens. But the awards are a joke anyway. They've especially been a joke since Anthony Cotton won Best Actor in 2007! He can't act, he'd never had a storyline, but I suspect the Corrie bosses were busy on the multi-voting that year! |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 38,853
|
Quote:
I think a lot of people set up new emails and vote that way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,096
|
I think hollyoaks does well going up against the three big soaps esp as alot of soaps have gone now. I remember the early awards when there was seven or eight casts there. I always support them as like doctors they are considered the underdogs at these events as they have smaller viewing figures.
The public do get it right occasionally and claire coopers award was well deserved last year but sometimes it is down to who they think are popular than acting skills in all the soaps. I will be supporting hollyoaks and most likely rolling my eyes when the same people win again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 38,853
|
Quote:
I think hollyoaks does well going up against the three big soaps esp as alot of soaps have gone now. I remember the early awards when there was seven or eight casts there. I always support them as like doctors they are considered the underdogs at these events as they have smaller viewing figures.
The public do get it right occasionally and claire coopers award was well deserved last year but sometimes it is down to who they think are popular than acting skills in all the soaps. I will be supporting hollyoaks and most likely rolling my eyes when the same people win again. No one picks anyone on acting ability but on who their favourites are! It's always been the case. I said years ago the only one that gets this right is the NTA because they have 'Most populatr' actor/actress. If it was down to acting ability the likes of David Neilson would have won years ago. But he's not appealing to 'young people', he's just a brilliant actor. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: God didn't do this, devil did
Posts: 28,118
|
C'mon Hollyoaks#dotheH. I hope they win some awards, personally I think they deserve it. The only one I don't agree about is Charlie (Freddie) for newcomer I would have went with Charlie (Robbie) or Kirsty (Leela). Good luck to all of them
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,086
|
Fair play to Oaks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cell Block H
Posts: 11,878
|
What would be funny now is if they only ended up winning one!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,297
|
Steph Davis really does deserve the nomination for Best Actress but it's obvious who it will go to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Emmerdale
Posts: 4,290
|
To be fair, despite not being a full-time regular viewer of the show anymore; when I have watched the show its impressed me it is different to other three British soaps for one I think it is the most creative of the bunch. There are still a good stream of characters on the show and I don't see any reason why it shouldn't pick up some awards at the British Soap Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,699
|
The fact that Charlie "my eyes do all the acting" Clapham is up for nomination shows what a joke these awards are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 407
|
I think Hollyoaks deserve to win a few, especially Anna Passey and Steph Davies. Who cares if people are multi-voting? I am sure fans of all the soaps do it too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sunny Scotland
Posts: 840
|
Quote:
Steph Davis really does deserve the nomination for Best Actress but it's obvious who it will go to.
Nominated in every category is brilliant but it's not exactly been Hollyoaks strongest year in terms of real drama and acting. There have been a few good moments (such as the Katy storyline) but the majority really hasn't been up to scratch in comparison to recent years. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cell Block H
Posts: 11,878
|
Quote:
I think Hollyoaks deserve to win a few, especially Anna Passey and Steph Davies. Who cares if people are multi-voting? I am sure fans of all the soaps do it too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 538
|
If hollyoaks only get one award- all the other soap fans will take the piss when eastenders only won 1 last year. People seem to have no reason for hating hollyoaks. Beyond a joke!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,096
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:06.



