• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
What would we all like to happen in BB6
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
jacko12
25-02-2005
just wondered what you all would like to happen and what changes you would like made??
I know i'd like to keep them all in to the end but after the first week open the voting for people to vote who they would want to win at the end,
would be interesting to see how the voting changed depending how people's opinion on the housemates changed week to week.
bailey1987
25-02-2005
2 Houses!!!!

jacko12
25-02-2005
Originally Posted by bailey1987:
“2 Houses!!!!

”

yeah but why two houses???
bailey1987
25-02-2005
because thats what the did in bb aussie and it was great it needed a little work but imagin how good it could be if they were competing against each other but didnt know it
jacko12
25-02-2005
Originally Posted by bailey1987:
“because thats what the did in bb aussie and it was great it needed a little work but imagin how good it could be if they were competing against each other but didnt know it”

only problem with that is they would need two live feeds on interactive and we would all end up just watching one, plus they have enough problems with the one live feed nether mind two
Brekkie
25-02-2005
I want to see the show develop from BB5 - or a complete revamp.

Big Brother 2 built on the format of Big Brother 1 - and like wise BB3 built on BB2 - but Big Brother 4 failed because the format didn't develop at all from BB3.

2 houses would be good. Either BB Aus style, with 7 in 2 basic houses (outdoor shower, stove etc) for around 3 weeks until 10 remain and then the houses merge.

Or begin with a really basic house with everything outdoors. The only room is the bedroom - which has straw beds, concrete beds etc. Then after a week they begin the rich-poor challenges similar to BB3 - with six moving into a second "rich" house - but this time the houses are completly seperate. As a further twist only those in the poor house can be nominated for eviction.


If they don't do that I want to see a complete revamp of the format with the introduction of the Head of House (Brazilian style - viewers still vote to evict!) and rather than the weekly tasks you have seperate one-off challenges for food, luxuries, Head of House etc.


As for the absolute minimum change - I'd like to see viewers "Voting to Evict" again. The change in CBB3 was pointless and got rid of something unique to Big Brother!
CLL Dodge
25-02-2005
No more rich-poor. It's been done.

2 houses would be good but there would have to be 12 in each house or the HMs would suss it out immediately.

Should be at least 3 up for eviction each week. Maybe allow evicted HMs to nominate someone to automatically be up the next week.

A bigger house with more secret rooms.

Plenty of nudity, sex, violence and bad language to annoy Daily Mail readers and Tory MPs.
swingaleg
25-02-2005
Originally Posted by jacko12:
“only problem with that is they would need two live feeds on interactive and we would all end up just watching one, plus they have enough problems with the one live feed nether mind two”


As long as the live feed & E4 coverage was of the house where the HMs thought they were the 'subs' and didn't know they were on telly...........


Meanwhile the other HMs would be playing up to the camera, singing, dancing, stripping, scheming.......and no one would be watching them.

Sweet...........
cheeks
25-02-2005
the obvious thing really, I'd like to see a proper winner who had no outside help from Endemol. If you read Dean's book you get the impression that Endemol have picked their winner before the programme has even started. That's really fair on the people have gone through the selection process isn't it?......
smalltree
26-02-2005
definately the public 'Vote to Evict' and definately no Hms to nominate..
One BB-house..
Day.1
BB selects each Hm a partner..
partners now remain 'joined at the hip' for entire week by 8ft rope/chain (similar in BB5)..
each subsequent week, Hms can nominate whom they do/don't want to 'bond' with..(BB ties-up the loose ends on odds/evens)
tasks are total contrast to the bondage scenario..
ie: self-indulgent freedom..ect
successful tasks are rewarded with special treats..
ie: being taken on a swift helicopter mystery-ride, untying 'bonds'..ect
One cellar-type room (conditions unknown/random) for disobedience or task failures..offender/s must role 2 dice to decide how long confined..maximum 12hrs.


btw: blueprint in progress
TheAllSeeingEye
27-02-2005
BB6 should create as many conflicts as possible. They should pick people who will not get on with each other at all.
Different entry times i.e first 6 HMs enter at 9pm and the other 6 will enter the next day at 9pm.
On first week they should nominate face to face.
There should be more secret rooms in the unexpected areas i.e the pool.
a planted HM, to stir things up.
Only 1 House, what works in other countries might not in ours.
Pete Callan
27-02-2005
no luxury house, no flash accessories, a small kitchen so only 2 can fit in at the 1 time, no sofas just coushins to sit on, just rice and beans throughout the 12 week run except if they win a task and get a special meal of ham sandwiches, no beds just one extra-large sleeping bag to fit 15 housemates and only 7 pillows, see through shower and toilet, no garden, etc.
Brekkie
27-02-2005
Disagree about the see-through shower. If you want nudity you have to give the housemates the impression of privacy!

Re: 2 houses - 2 live feeds. On the surface it does make sense to have two feeds, but isn't an absolute neccessary - the single feed in the one house doesn't cover all housemates.
yahoodlums
27-02-2005
multiple live feeds, no shots of garden/statues/furniture when interesting things happen, no loss of sound for legal reasons, positive voting, nomination talk allowed, plenty of alcohol...
bailey1987
01-03-2005
when you go on interactive it should stop the sound dipping and the camera going to chicken's arse cam(thank god they went last year)
Coolies
01-03-2005
BB6 or should i say Davina should be discreet with suprises etc this year, Knowing her on the first night saying we did have 2 houses she would talk to the wrong house. lol
TheBlueOne
01-03-2005
Originally Posted by Faisal:
“On first week they should nominate face to face.”

They should nominate in public, but when the nominated housemates are informed, instead just play a video of the nominations with a running tally below.

This will get the bitchyness really going.
nickthegreek2k5
01-03-2005
they should allow discussions of nominations.

i mean y not? will add a dimension to the show we aint seen before!
Me Me Me
01-03-2005
The show should last longer!
CLL Dodge
01-03-2005
Originally Posted by nickthegreek2k5:
“they should allow discussions of nominations.

i mean y not? will add a dimension to the show we aint seen before!”


Except every hour of every day of BB5 until the last week.
Cornchips
02-03-2005
Humour - mind games - 1 HM should be a plant (although the audience needs to know about it).
msknight
02-03-2005
I reckon that each evictee should serve as a Big Brother agent for a few days in the bed sit before actually coming out of the house; I'd like to see some of the tasks split up in to sections, like the Crystal Maze, with various house mates suffering or being "lock out" of the house for a night as a result of actions of other housemates.

I'd like to see more challenging tests though, things that really test the housemates metal.

Michelle.
Cjw
03-03-2005
Quote:
“2 houses - 2 live feeds”

Surround sound airplane noises !
bailey1987
03-03-2005
i would love there to be 2 houses mabey they could have them above and below each other that way the press wont get suspisous
V1Chris21
03-03-2005
I think there should be two houses, 1st week everyone stays in one house, the public vote for who they want to win (but the housemates think its the person they want out), the person who wins goes into another house. when there are six people in each house, then both house play together but the original housmates wont know that they can no longer win, only the six in the 2nd house can win. Can you imagine the looks on the winners face from house 1 when they realise they havn't won? lol
<<
<
1 of 2
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map