• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
Wow; just wow @ the brazen gall of EE
<<
<
1 of 5
>>
>
Filiman
28-04-2014
Ok I imagine there is another thread on this cuz I am late to the part but: Lacey turner for best actress. For real!!!!! I am right in thinking that this was a nomination put forward BY EE???!!!??!!

So this is obviously the real reason they want Stacey back: because she wins awards undeservedly.

I actually cannot believe this tbh. How little regard do they have for their other actresses. Diane parish anyone???? I mean for god's sake even linda Henry deserves it more than turner.

I find this disgusting.
bass55
28-04-2014
She was nominated for best actress (by EastEnders) when she had barely been back two weeks. Utterly shameless.
Joe_Zel
28-04-2014


I'm sharpening my pitchfork!!! They cannot get away with this!!!


In other news, people are dying in the world.
Hildaonpluto
28-04-2014
Originally Posted by bass55:
“She was nominated for best actress (by EastEnders) when she had barely been back two weeks. Utterly shameless.”

Here Here fully agree.It may well backfire though.
john176bramley
28-04-2014
She's the Ant n Dec of soap.
guestofseth
28-04-2014
Bit of an overreaction, don't you think? These are awards are nothing more than free publicity for the soaps, especially the public voted awards, so of course they're going to put forward their most popular actors, even if they haven't been in it that much. She only made the shortlist because people voted for her, the producers put her up on the longlist but nobody forced people to vote for her.

I don't like it that much either but at least Lindsey Coulson still made the shortlist, and it's not really worth getting worked up over.
yohinnchild
28-04-2014
It's the soap awards... ie a load of meaningless bollocks
Hit Em Up Style
28-04-2014
Diane Parish was up but she sadly missed out on the shortlist. Lindsey Couson thankfully made it through but really it should have been Sam Womack nominated over Lacey Turner.

Lacey will probably win but it would be great if Lindsey could.
ryanr554
28-04-2014
It's probably just to publicize the fact that she is back. If you didn't watch EE constantly for the past few months I doubt you would even know that Stacey even returned.

Besides, they nominated Lindsey Coulson anyway, I feel like she is a pretty underrated actress so I am glad they put her forward.
Filiman
28-04-2014
Originally Posted by Joe_Zel:
“

I'm sharpening my pitchfork!!! They cannot get away with this!!!


In other news, people are dying in the world.”

As someone who worked with oxfam in Papua New Guinea I find your comment both asinine (for a soaps forum) and offensive. Get off your high horse.
Filiman
28-04-2014
Originally Posted by guestofseth:
“Bit of an overreaction, don't you think? These are awards are nothing more than free publicity for the soaps, especially the public voted awards, so of course they're going to put forward their most popular actors, even if they haven't been in it that much. She only made the shortlist because people voted for her, the producers put her up on the longlist but nobody forced people to vote for her.

I don't like it that much either but at least Lindsey Coulson still made the shortlist, and it's not really worth getting worked up over.”

Of course awards are ridiculous it has less to do with that and more to do with the gall of putting forward turner in the first place. It's ridiculous and a troubling example of production thinking. Yes I was being hyperbolic but I honestly cannot see how you can't put forward for an award (regardless of the award's merit) someone who has been in the show 2 weeks. Come on - it is very suggestive of their thinking.

I just struggle to understand how that can be done; that was the source of my "outrage".
Filiman
28-04-2014
Originally Posted by yohinnchild:
“It's the soap awards... ie a load of meaningless bollocks”

Agree; it's not the awards it's the thinking behind it that is troubling.
alias alias
28-04-2014
She will win on the basis of a weeks episodes! that is really going to cheeze the others off lol
dan2008
28-04-2014
Originally Posted by Filiman:
“Ok I imagine there is another thread on this cuz I am late to the part but: Lacey turner for best actress. For real!!!!! I am right in thinking that this was a nomination put forward BY EE???!!!??!!

So this is obviously the real reason they want Stacey back: because she wins awards undeservedly.

I actually cannot believe this tbh. How little regard do they have for their other actresses. Diane parish anyone???? I mean for god's sake even linda Henry deserves it more than turner.

I find this disgusting.”

Diane Parish was in the long list but she didn't get enough votes to make it into the short list.
Joe_Zel
28-04-2014
Originally Posted by Filiman:
“As someone who worked with oxfam in Papua New Guinea I find your comment both asinine (for a soaps forum) and offensive. Get off your high horse.”

Discussing soaps in a soap forum is fine.

Calling the nomination of an actress in a public voted awards ceremony "disgusting" is highly over the top.

So, no, your overreaction is asinine.

The very fact they are public voted awards makes them even more useless and more of a "Most Popular Actor" award. Far from disgusting. It's not the producer's fault Parish didn't garner as many votes.
T.K. Mazin
28-04-2014
Let's face it, if Stacey did a dump in the middle of the Square, she would win an award for that .

That's how Soap Awards work. It's more a popularity contest than a genuine acting awards ceremony if you ask me. Certain actors will keep getting nominated regardless.
KatrinaK
28-04-2014
I agree.

Although I find Lacey an extreamly talented young actress, I do find her nomination this year to be unwarrented.

I'll never deny her talent but she's done nothing to warrent a best actress nomination. She's only been on screen for a few weeks, and while she did well for what has been, IMO, weak material, other actresses have been superior.

However yes, these are popularity awards and always has been. There is more chance of Lacey winning best actress over a few weeks work over Lindsey, Diane, Linda etc who have deliverered all year around. Sad but true. I still remember Ross Kemp winning best actor in 2006 for three weeks work!
dan2008
28-04-2014
I have voted for Lindsey Coulson
Last Request
28-04-2014
Originally Posted by Filiman:
“As someone who worked with oxfam in Papua New Guinea I find your comment both asinine (for a soaps forum) and offensive. Get off your high horse.”

Joe is a Stacey fan.

Her inclusion for best actress is a compete and utter joke shows how bad the actresses in Eastenders actually are.
sorcha_healy27
28-04-2014
I agree with you that she shouldnt have been put forward but i think the reaction is a bit OTT. If there's any justice Lindsay should win anyway
xTonix
28-04-2014
Originally Posted by Last Request:
“Joe is a Stacey fan.

Her inclusion for best actress is a compete and utter joke shows how bad the actresses in Eastenders actually are.”

EE have some of the best actresses in soap, in fact, imo, EE have the best set of actor in soap full stop.
Heathyheath_
28-04-2014
To me these awards lost all credibility when Michael Moon didn't receive a best villain nomination. They don't seem to judge on a whole year, just recent events.
Reem2011
28-04-2014
I voted Lindsey
Joe_Zel
28-04-2014
Originally Posted by Last Request:
“Joe is a Stacey fan.”



How wrong you are. I was completely against her return to be honest but do carry on.
sorcha_healy27
28-04-2014
Originally Posted by Joe_Zel:
“

How wrong you are. I was completely against her return to be honest but do carry on.”

<<
<
1 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map