Originally Posted by clonmult:
“Chances are that for most peoples usage, something like the 930 probably offers everything that they're likely to want - the 1020 camera is better, but not by as much as Nokia would like you to believe. It'll be interesting to see what the 1020 successor will offer.”
The real benefit of the 1020 is the lossless zoom, and the ability to crop afterwards (or even zoom out). Of course this means storing the original 38MP image as well as the 5MP one.
Given you're getting a 5MP image most of the time, the 930 (or the 1520) or any other Lumia with the 20.7MP camera, is probably more than sufficient and means losing the bulge of the 1020 camera (but also the Xenon flash unless you get one of the US models that has this, like the Icon?).
Since the latest update on the Xperia Z1/Z1 Compact (and I guess the Z2) I am now getting stunning shots from my Z1 Compact (20.7MP camera) and it seems Sony has finally got its camera app to get the full potential from the sensor, much like Nokia has with its own sensors. Of course, none of these are Windows Phones.
To keep on topic, since I have been able to get shots like the one below I don't feel it as necessary to take my 1020 (with the camera grip and also running Windows Phone 8.1) out as much as I did.
There's something about the 1020, and Windows Phone in general, that is still keeping me from making the switch - but I can't say it won't all click into place in the future.
BTW, here's a photo I got over the weekend. Let me point out that it has been enhanced by Google+ when it was auto backed up, but I can provide the original for anyone that is sceptical. The point is, even though Google upped the saturation, you can see the level of detail in the photo (if you download the original). It's every bit as good as the Lumia 1520 camera, and a reason why the 1020 is perhaps overkill for a lot of people.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hlp7sj18jw...8-enhanced.JPG