Originally Posted by ChrisHay:
“Maybe we will be able to recreate dinosaurs from their dead flesh. These stories are kept suspiciously quiet, maybe because they totally undermine & contradict current scientific theories.
http://phys.org/news/2013-04-scienti...in-fossil.html
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...ino-mummy.html
http://creation.com/fresh-dinosaur-bones-found
In 1961 a petroleum geologist discovered a large, half-metre-thick bone bed. As the bones were fresh, not permineralized, he assumed that these were recent bison bones. It took 20 years for scientists to recognize duckbill dinosaur bones in this deposit as well as the bones of horned dinosaurs, and large and small carnivorous dinosaurs.
It took science 20 years to tell the difference between bison & dinosaur bones. I see no reason to have faith in all current scientific assumptions.
"How these bones could have remained in fresh condition for 70 million years is a perplexing question.
Geologists claim that these forest remains are about 45 million years old. Nevertheless, the wood and leaf debris are astonishingly well preserved. The plant material is not petrified. The logs are still wood which can be sawn and burnt. The leaf debris and cones include some specimens recognizable as dawn redwood....
The obvious conclusion is that these bones were deposited in relatively recent times. This bone bed is stunning evidence that the time of the dinosaurs was not millions of years ago, but perhaps only thousands. It is time geologists recognized the implications of their own data."
Science examines the evidence, tests/disproves theories.
Why are these discoveries being ignored? Is it because they do not fit in with current theory?
There are many stories from many parts of the world, that we are taught now to ridicule. Is it time to accept that dragons are in fact dinosaurs and man & beast were around at the same time?
No I am not a creationist, in the traditional sense - despite the link to creation.com”
“Maybe we will be able to recreate dinosaurs from their dead flesh. These stories are kept suspiciously quiet, maybe because they totally undermine & contradict current scientific theories.
http://phys.org/news/2013-04-scienti...in-fossil.html
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...ino-mummy.html
http://creation.com/fresh-dinosaur-bones-found
In 1961 a petroleum geologist discovered a large, half-metre-thick bone bed. As the bones were fresh, not permineralized, he assumed that these were recent bison bones. It took 20 years for scientists to recognize duckbill dinosaur bones in this deposit as well as the bones of horned dinosaurs, and large and small carnivorous dinosaurs.
It took science 20 years to tell the difference between bison & dinosaur bones. I see no reason to have faith in all current scientific assumptions.
"How these bones could have remained in fresh condition for 70 million years is a perplexing question.
Geologists claim that these forest remains are about 45 million years old. Nevertheless, the wood and leaf debris are astonishingly well preserved. The plant material is not petrified. The logs are still wood which can be sawn and burnt. The leaf debris and cones include some specimens recognizable as dawn redwood....
The obvious conclusion is that these bones were deposited in relatively recent times. This bone bed is stunning evidence that the time of the dinosaurs was not millions of years ago, but perhaps only thousands. It is time geologists recognized the implications of their own data."
Science examines the evidence, tests/disproves theories.
Why are these discoveries being ignored? Is it because they do not fit in with current theory?
There are many stories from many parts of the world, that we are taught now to ridicule. Is it time to accept that dragons are in fact dinosaurs and man & beast were around at the same time?
No I am not a creationist, in the traditional sense - despite the link to creation.com”
Total and utter bollocks.

Try reading up on a topic before infecting it with creationism.
Science is so much more interesting than fairytales.




