DS Forums

 
 

S3 & S3 mini abandoned by Samsung already


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 19-07-2014, 10:22
gillyallan
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,115
At moment I don't feel I've anything missing from my s3 mini. Wife has kikat on nexus tab and looks a non worthy update to be honest. Not to say the L Upgrade won't be though.
gillyallan is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 19-07-2014, 11:49
kidspud
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,501
(the statute of limitation on daft comments never expires)

Do I need to explain, really!!

The update cycle of a phone should be based on how long kidspud has owned the phone and you feel this is perfectly logical. If I was to buy say an iphone 4 or an s3 I should expect the length of expected support to be based on the day I had it new

In addition as you made the similar complaints about your Ace 2, it seems you can't have been that "disappointed" to purchase another Samsung.
Not sure how you read all that into my comment.

Good to know daft comments don't expire, you have quite a collect.

The update issue with my ace 2 was not the same, but yes I find buy a second samsung. At the time they were the best option for cheap phones from an established provider.
kidspud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-07-2014, 09:20
Stig
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sandy Heath, Beds. UK
Posts: 10,383
And how many free OS version updates did those PCs get if they were using windows? None. The S3 went fromm 4.0 to 4.1 to 4.3. And it wont stop working just because it doesn't have L coming.
A poor argument. Windows XP was supported by Microsoft for a very long time, and we've only had the recent fuss because support just stopped. It had updates and patches all during that 12 years or so.
Stig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-07-2014, 22:23
alanwarwic
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
Windows XP's essential HTML core stopped at IE 8.
Of course stuff they actually sold again, like Office, continued far longer.

If you look at IOS they take a Microsoft viewpoint. IOS 8 omits newer features depending on the age of the phone.
But quite obviously, likely as not, everyone will get I-Beacon features in IOS 8.
alanwarwic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-07-2014, 22:44
Thine Wonk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,577
Windows XP's essential HTML core stopped at IE 8.
Of course stuff they actually sold again, like Office, continued far longer.

If you look at IOS they take a Microsoft viewpoint. IOS 8 omits newer features depending on the age of the phone.
But quite obviously, likely as not, everyone will get I-Beacon features in IOS 8.
It's an operating system though not a browser, the OS carried on getting support, patches and updates for 14 years, whilst office and many applications all worked with it and were supported.

What Samsung and other Android platform manufacturers do is stop updating the devices against security updates and put users at risk by abandoning devices only 18 months in to sale in some cases. They don't even allow a generic Android upgrade path once they've abandoned it and often make it deliberately difficult to root etc even out of warranty. I think this is quite a poor show, I would expect a device to be supported for a reasonable typical lifespan, or a generic upgrade option once the manufacturer decides "they've had your money, now sling your hook".

I think there's a lot of improvements that could be made to the current Android mess of vendor firmware, for example security updates should be separated from the vendor skin where possible and there should be a legitimate and simple for every day users method to take any manufacturer firmware and install generic Android if the vendor decides to stop updating the device.
Thine Wonk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-07-2014, 22:57
alanwarwic
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
It's an operating system though not a browser..
Well any OS is a base system with software bundled/bloated on.

Google has even unbundled much of Android now so that they can continue to update software that helps make them money. The big dilemma is that manufacturers like Samsung want stuff discontinued to sell anew.

Apple of course will only continue the stuff that makes them good money. So if apps sell well on old 32 bit hardware then 32 bit apps get to stay. And obviously near everyone gets to have iBeacon.
alanwarwic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-07-2014, 08:43
tdenson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,214
Apple of course will only continue the stuff that makes them good money. So if apps sell well on old 32 bit hardware then 32 bit apps get to stay. And obviously near everyone gets to have iBeacon.
You really are going on about iBeacons aren't you, you mention it in every other post and it's getting quite tiresome. Has noone told you this is an optional feature. Just switch it off if you don't like it.
However, personally I am looking forward to all sorts of app possibilities. e.g. it will be nice to sit in comfort in an arrivals hall and be notified when your baggage is coming down the carousel rather than jostling shoulder to shoulder with everyone else. The applications of iBeacon technology are limitless.
tdenson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-07-2014, 10:58
alanwarwic
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
... and it's getting quite tiresome....The applications of iBeacon technology are limitless.
I only ever mention stuff I actually see. Yes it has its uses though the first implementation was the important one, marketing.

I'm sorry that you find that perception of it 'tiresome'. And I thought it helped balance out that 'an OS is what you get'.
alanwarwic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-07-2014, 11:06
alanwarwic
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: the wild world web
Posts: 28,132
...e.g. it will be nice to sit in comfort in an arrivals hall and be notified when your baggage is coming down the carousel...
Stuff like a boarding pass/NFC, WIfi, SMS, NFC and messaging is already there. So why are you waiting for a likely US only walled garden only solution?

It can only really branch out beyond the US via 'advertising' as it will have to pay its way.
alanwarwic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-07-2014, 12:49
kidspud
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 11,501
I only ever mention stuff I actually see. Yes it has its uses though the first implementation was the important one, marketing.

I'm sorry that you find that perception of it 'tiresome'. And I thought it helped balance out that 'an OS is what you get'.
Tell us more about your experience of seeing this technology in action. Where did you use it?
kidspud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-07-2014, 13:37
tdenson
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,214
Stuff like a boarding pass/NFC, WIfi, SMS, NFC and messaging is already there. So why are you waiting for a likely US only walled garden only solution?

It can only really branch out beyond the US via 'advertising' as it will have to pay its way.
Alan, you obviously haven't a clue how iBeacons work (or you wouldn't spout such paranoid drivel). Are you aware it is based on Low Energy Bluetooth, which is not an Apple proprietary technology.

I am not "waiting for a likely US only walled garden solution". The fact is that one could write an app today to implement the scenario I described above and it would work at any airport anywhere in the world. You simply put an iBeacon tag (or equivalent from some other incarnation of LE BT) into your luggage, and write an app to tell you when it comes into range. The point though of Apple's implementation is that it will be easy for developers to make use of the technology and there will as a result be a tidal wave of applications like this. Please tell me how NFC, wifi or SMS provide this solution, I am all ears.
tdenson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-07-2014, 17:58
aurichie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,100
Bollocks. Another phone loses out because of crappy manufacturer placed junky bloatware.
This is the one big thing iPhones have over Android devices. I bought my iPhone 4S back in October 2011 and it shipped with iOS 5. A year later it received a free upgrade to iOS 6 . Another year later it received an update to iOS 7. This year it will be receiving a free upgrade to iOS 8.

In March 2012 I got a Sony Xperia S on a new contract. It shipped with Ginger Bread but the packaging promised it was upgradeable to Ice Cream Sandwich. And the issues began:

- You had to wait months into July 2012 before the ICS software started shipping to UK Carriers.
- When it arrived it was horribly buggy/laggy and Sony essentially abandoned it before finally committing to a Jelly Bean upgrade in January 2013.
- That Jelly Bean upgrade finally started being delivered in June 2013
- Jelly Bean was also buggy (for example: volume up would stop working after a while, and would require a reboot).
- Sony did release a minor patch for volume control issue a couple months later, but issue with degraded camera pictures and video recording, battery life, etc. were never resolved. It was later confirmed that this was the last software update the Xperia S would receive.

Have I considered buying another Android device since? Hell no. And this is the problem Google faces when OEM partners behave badly.
aurichie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-07-2014, 21:03
Ultraman1966
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 263
This is the one big thing iPhones have over Android devices. I bought my iPhone 4S back in October 2011 and it shipped with iOS 5. A year later it received a free upgrade to iOS 6 . Another year later it received an update to iOS 7. This year it will be receiving a free upgrade to iOS 8.

In March 2012 I got a Sony Xperia S on a new contract. It shipped with Ginger Bread but the packaging promised it was upgradeable to Ice Cream Sandwich. And the issues began:

- You had to wait months into July 2012 before the ICS software started shipping to UK Carriers.
- When it arrived it was horribly buggy/laggy and Sony essentially abandoned it before finally committing to a Jelly Bean upgrade in January 2013.
- That Jelly Bean upgrade finally started being delivered in June 2013
- Jelly Bean was also buggy (for example: volume up would stop working after a while, and would require a reboot).
- Sony did release a minor patch for volume control issue a couple months later, but issue with degraded camera pictures and video recording, battery life, etc. were never resolved. It was later confirmed that this was the last software update the Xperia S would receive.

Have I considered buying another Android device since? Hell no. And this is the problem Google faces when OEM partners behave badly.
In Google's defence. they have done a stirling job with the Nexus program to fix that issue. Furthermore, OEMs are starting to really get to grips with earlier updates. Your points are valid though, phones pre 2013 are quite often behind on updates or abandoned all together.
Ultraman1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-07-2014, 21:20
jchamier
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: This forum
Posts: 3,392
It's an operating system though not a browser, the OS carried on getting support, patches and updates for 14 years, whilst office and many applications all worked with it and were supported.
And importantly for corporates and governments, everything that shipped with the OS (yes, including that awful IE6) was equally patched, and maintained for an amazing 14 years. One reason why it was so hard to get companies to ditch IE6 :-/
jchamier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-07-2014, 00:02
aurichie
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,100
In Google's defence. they have done a stirling job with the Nexus program to fix that issue. Furthermore, OEMs are starting to really get to grips with earlier updates. Your points are valid though, phones pre 2013 are quite often behind on updates or abandoned all together.
Yeah I think the problem is OEMs don't really feel they have a vested interest in the success of the platform. Their obvious interest is selling as many phones as possible to customers and supporting old phones for longer slows planned obsolescence.

The Nexus phones are good but they aren't even close to being the best Android devices out there. There are compromises with the camera, battery life, etc. which you would expect at that price point. And these are compromises I'm unwilling to accept.

I know some OEMs are making stronger commitments to support phones for longer, but still I feel like I'm getting shortchanged in comparison to what I get from Apple in terms of update and support. In thinking about my earlier post, I actually ignored the fact Apple provides dozens upon dozens of point releases with fixes along the way while waiting on the major updates. Sony provided about four updates (including the major ones) for the life of my device. Not that I'm still bitter about it.
aurichie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-07-2014, 00:33
Stiggles
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Posts: 9,293
Yeah I think the problem is OEMs don't really feel they have a vested interest in the success of the platform. Their obvious interest is selling as many phones as possible to customers and supporting old phones for longer slows planned obsolescence.

The Nexus phones are good but they aren't even close to being the best Android devices out there. There are compromises with the camera, battery life, etc. which you would expect at that price point. And these are compromises I'm unwilling to accept.

I know some OEMs are making stronger commitments to support phones for longer, but still I feel like I'm getting shortchanged in comparison to what I get from Apple in terms of update and support. In thinking about my earlier post, I actually ignored the fact Apple provides dozens upon dozens of point releases with fixes along the way while waiting on the major updates. Sony provided about four updates (including the major ones) for the life of my device. Not that I'm still bitter about it.
The camera on my nexus 5 is great for pictures. Where it fails is video. While the picture is superb, the sound is terrible. Battery life, well it lasts me the same amount of time any other phone ever has. It get charged nightly, and when it does there is always between 20 - 35% left.

Other than that, spec wise its pretty much on par with top end devices.
Stiggles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-07-2014, 01:15
jonmorris
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: a land filled with trolls
Posts: 12,018
My Nexus 5 doesn't last anywhere near as long as other phones I have. It's not terrible by any means, but the battery is simply not big enough to support that (gorgeous) screen and processor.

The phone is a bargain though, and mine is now kept in the car as a SatNav/Spotify player and is constantly kept on charge when used so it's no longer an issue. When I was using it as my main phone, around Christmas time, I always carried a 4,500mAh portable battery to keep it charged up, or charge it up when it got low - which it did quite often.

Clearly my usage could be a lot higher than yours though.
jonmorris is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:48.