|
||||||||
EE - Should Ronnie be given a baby? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,828
|
EE - Should Ronnie be given a baby?
I can't help but feel that it would add a fresh new dimension to her character. I'd like to see her get pregnant again, but actually have a baby which doesn't die this time. Her road to villainy can still continue in the meantime.
It would be good for Ronnie to leave some sort of legacy behind on the show. It'd be great if she gave birth to a baby boy who grows up to be the next Archie years down the line. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Northern Britain
Posts: 231
|
I agree. It would add a wonderful poignancy, especially if Ronnie was involved in Lucy's death, if she was given a little baby to look out for, as she inevitably becomes a super villian. It would also lend more sympathy if she was doing her criminal deeds to provide for her baby, and give them the life Danielle and James were never able to have, rather than her simply being obsessed with Roxy and Lola. If Charlie really is Nick's son, imagine, Nick Cotton and Archie Mitchell's grandson/daughter - the potential for a truly epic character for future EE! I think it should absolutely happen. But the baby must be born with NO complications and NOT die for several decades! (Note the emphasis lol)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Suck it
Posts: 7,777
|
Should Ronnie be given a baby?
As a sacrifice?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Team Moira is not a slag.
Posts: 25,900
|
but whose baby should we give her? One from EE or maybe we should pick one from another soap, less local and less chance of getting caught that way. Kat's got 2 coming along, she should share, does anybody ever need 2 of anything? Especially people, apart from shoes in other colours, obviously, but people naaaaa that's just greed. Yeah give her one of Kat's children, NOW!
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,444
|
As an exit story I think. A happy ending of sorts. I'm guessing she'll never have a happy relationship/marriage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: London
Posts: 16,810
|
Only with the guarantee that she will be allowed to be happy, where is she anyway?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,839
|
No I think she is too far gone, her exit will be death. I am convinced she will be killed off protecting Amy/Roxy from a fire or some such.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Button Moon
Posts: 7,251
|
Hell to the no.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Walford/TARDIS
Posts: 8,620
|
Quote:
As a sacrifice?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 3,932
|
Babies ruin characters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,467
|
We don't really know if she's leaving she might still be on the square for another 7 years for all we know but all depends on what is planned for her, If she does leave they might keep it secret like they did with Yusef in the B&B fire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ronnie's bed
Posts: 20,574
|
Quote:
Only with the guarantee that she will be allowed to be happy, where is she anyway?
Ronnie should be back on screen in mid June. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: I like to singy singy singy...
Posts: 17,667
|
Quote:
As a sacrifice?
![]() I love the idea of Ronnie Malefecent Mitchell demanding the residents of Walford give up their first born once a year to placate her beautiful murderous tendencies. No one can slay her until Sharon, tired of Phil, drugs him with Vodka, dresses him in a nappy and leaves him at her lair. Ronnie goes to breastfeed him then looks down at his sweaty face, let's out an almighty scream and the spell is broken. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Suck it
Posts: 7,777
|
Quote:
I love the idea of Ronnie Malefecent Mitchell demanding the residents of Walford give up their first born once a year to placate her beautiful murderous tendencies. No one can slay her until Sharon, tired of Phil, drugs him with Vodka, dresses him in a nappy and leaves him at her lair. Ronnie goes to breastfeed him then looks down at his sweaty face, let's out an almighty scream and the spell is broken. ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Back of the wrekin
Posts: 11
|
Should Ronnie be given a baby
I would be willing to give her one a baby that is
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,152
|
But she is a mentally disturbed child kidnapper and a murderer. We can't afford to take the risk. She shouldn't be anywhere near children. It makes me feel sick to the pit of my stomach.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Herr Flick's dungeon
Posts: 5,939
|
Quote:
but whose baby should we give her? One from EE or maybe we should pick one from another soap, less local and less chance of getting caught that way. Kat's got 2 coming along, she should share, does anybody ever need 2 of anything? Especially people, apart from shoes in other colours, obviously, but people naaaaa that's just greed. Yeah give her one of Kat's children, NOW!
Ronnie should have her own! |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 3,444
|
Quote:
I don't think Kat would give Ronnie one of her babies, she might give her a slap though!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Walford/TARDIS
Posts: 8,620
|
Quote:
Kat would never give any of her kids away and I doubt Ronnie would accept it anyway, not from her sister's ex husband and his scarlet woman!
Ronnie should have her own! |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,621
|
Quote:
I can't help but feel that it would add a fresh new dimension to her character. I'd like to see her get pregnant again, but actually have a baby which doesn't die this time. Her road to villainy can still continue in the meantime.
It would be good for Ronnie to leave some sort of legacy behind on the show. It'd be great if she gave birth to a baby boy who grows up to be the next Archie years down the line. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: EastLUNDERN
Posts: 6,247
|
Unfortunately that ship has sailed. She is now damaged beyond repair. She would ruin the child and the child would ruin her. However would make some good television but it would be too depressing for me, given her history and that…
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,370
|
If they ever did Maybe a step child would be better one older she could raise, a child centric s/l for her though nearly burnt her out last time, sometimes it's best left alone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Herr Flick's dungeon
Posts: 5,939
|
Quote:
She can't do that, she'd end up inside because of the suspended sentence if Ronnie reported her. (Obviously some forum members would like this...)
Yes some forum members would love to see Kat in jail, she's not as popular as she used to be but she's a sight more popular than Alfie! |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 14,370
|
Quote:
She can't do that, she'd end up inside because of the suspended sentence if Ronnie reported her. (Obviously some forum members would like this...)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,750
|
Well it would only be a matter of time before he/she drowns in a bath tub .or he/she's pram slides off the pavement into the path of a speeding lorry. I say for the babies sake NO!!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:17.



