There seems to be ones for series 4 and 6 but not 5. This is the first year I started watching the apprentice all the way through. I won't be doing every week though.

Week 4 - Paula (I would say Noorul but he was the winning project manager.) I just feel that Paula the project manager did not properly deligate the costings to other members of the team, and only started to blame Ben after she found about the mistake.

Week 5 - Could have been Philip for his terrible idea, but Noorul somehow escaped the boardroom. Out of the 3 in the boardroom I say Philip because of his distruptive influance.

Week 7 - Philip and it led to one of the best all time moments as Lorraine says that Kate and Philip were on a "jolly day out."

Week 12 - I think Kate should have won.

BIB - Why?

Ah I loved this series.
I always think back to my initial reaction for these results because it's much more interesting, despite not having much of a clue about business. lol

1 - Mona, Anita, Debra
She did seem like she was a fish out of water, mistook that they weren't supposed to use all of their budget for the cleaning equipment and was looking for justification for her decisions from other people.

2 - Rocky, Howard, James
Too young, like a deer caught in the headlights despite it being his particular field.

3 - James, Ben, Majid
The overall team seemed somewhat lacklustre for this task and Ben at least came up with a concept. Before the boardroom I would have probably gone for James, but James had more individual spark than Majid.

4 - Paula, Ben, Yasmina
Totally split three ways, but since all of them were together for the ingredients then the PM has to take most of the responsibility and they should be most aware that their arse is on the line if they fail.
It would have been good though, like Sugar wanted, to change the rules and fire Noorul instead.

5 - Kimberly, Lorraine, Philip
I remember being quite angry at this result. It was a bit sad watching Kimberly's upbeat spirit getting beat down by the collective misery of Lorraine/Philip. I actually felt at this point that Lorraine was too much of a complainer who had great ideas when it was too late to use them.

6 - Ben, Debra, Noorul
Way too disorganised and weak. Watching him act all fiery in the boardroom was kind of funny as it did not suit him at all.

7 - Lorraine, Kate, Philip
There would have been no question with this decision. Found him incredibly unlikeable and kind of went off Kate for this task. She spent the day flirting, laughing the task off and making excuses for it in the boardroom.

8 - Debra, James, Mona
This was probably the oddest result of the series for me. I was kind of tired of James by this point and thought Mona was much more competent. Infact I'd have even thought about firing Debra over Mona. I feel like this was one of the results most decided by who's good for TV.

9 - James, Ben, Debra
Think his bravado had finally caught up with him and he flopped on this task.

10 - Howard, Kate, Lorraine
I felt like he was the least inspiring candidate and and played things way too safe.

11 - Debra, James, Kate, Lorraine, Yasmina
James kind of confirmed my apprehensions about him getting this far.

To be honest I'd have rather had a four-person final here rather than in series 4. But I do admit that Lorraine was the most limited candidate out of the 4. Would have probably put them in these teams - Debra/Lorraine, Kate/Yasmina. Putting the two louder ones together to see how well they get on.

Presuming the winning team would be Kate/Yasmina, which it probably would.
Hired - Yasmina
I felt she was far more gutsy and determined than Kate.

I disagree with your overall opinions on James, meglos, as you'll probably find out. A fun series, with quite a few disagreements with Sir Alan, mainly featuring Ben who I couldn't stand. Here are mine:

Week 1

Who was fired? Anita
Who should have been fired? Mona/Anita
Why? I was torn this week because all three genuinely had legitimate reasons to go. Debra made the error in the car showroom and didn’t lead the sub-team particularly well, Mona wasn’t a great PM as she didn’t delegate and failed to recognise that there needed to be a budget and Anita didn’t show anything whilst moaning and pouting in the corner. For the firing, I would probably have let Debra stay for doing a decent job apart from the car showroom and for doing well in the boardroom. I’m honestly not sure what to say out of Mona and Anita. Mona should have gone on the task basis for not delegating or overseeing how much the stock was costing them, but in that situation, I think I’d have let her stay for showing more of a spark than Anita in the first task.

Week 2

Who was fired? Rocky
Who should have been fired? Rocky
Why? Not that you would have known it from the ridiculous boardroom where literally nothing about the task was discussed, but Rocky was 100% responsible for the failure of the task. He let Philip rough-ride him all the way through, he ran with a stupid Olympic theme just because it was thought of by one of his mates, he came up with stupid ideas of costumes, he brought almost literally none of his supposed catering experience to the table and, worst of all, he spent over £800 overall, not considering where it all went to. I suppose Majid deserved some stick for coming up with the terrible Olympic theme and Philip, in particular deserved criticism for losing the early lunch pitch and acting unprofessionally in front of the client, but task-wise Rocky was 100% culpable. In addition, he stupidly indulged the idiotic boy’s club mentality and brought in two outsiders, one of which (Howard) did arguably the best job of the boys on the team. Rocky fully deserved his firing.

Week 3

Who was fired? Majid
Who should have been fired? Ben
Why? I don’t have a huge problem with Majid being fired, as I really disliked him on a personal level, he did try to make the Home Multi-Tone incorporate more than one idea and he had showed almost literally nothing in the three weeks. However, Ben ran in the task, determined to put his stamp on the task and didn’t care about anything his PM was telling him at all or entertaining anyone else’s ideas. To suggest that Ben had the one and only idea and there was no chance of another idea cropping up is a frankly untrue version of events. James did everything in the task right, apart from overseeing the production of the product and I thought he did a good job. He was largely honest, decisive and managed the team very well, setting out clear briefs at each stage of the project. Ben clearly ignored James’s concise instructions that the product should be simple, ignored any other ideas, blatantly lied in the boardroom and refused to accept any sort of responsibility, so for those reasons, he really did deserve to go.

Week 4

Who was fired? Paula
Who should have been fired? Ben
Why? Whilst I do accept that he wasn’t categorically involved with making the huge mix-up which resulted in the only reason for the failure of the task, by not checking Paula and Yasmina’s work and by sitting back and not doing the job that he had been assigned (which by the way had nothing to do with his insistence that he needed to step back because soap was girly) Ben was looking for an exit strategy and as partially in charge of costs, he partially needed to take responsibility. Paula was a brilliant PM apart from the Sandalwood error – she motivated the team well, made quick decisions, bounced back well from the error and was chiefly responsible for the team’s terrific product. For those reasons, as well as her admitting fault, I would have probably kept her on. It was Yasmina’s worst task so far, but she’s been one of the top performers so far and, she also admitted fault so she deserved to stay. Considering Ben also tanked the task the previous week, has shown nothing much so far, he was a raging knob in the boardroom and, worst of all, he ran a mile from responsibility but tried to constantly take credit meant I would have definitely fired him.

Week 5

Who was fired? Kimberly
Who should have been fired? Kimberly and Philip
Why? For a start, Kim seemed like a lovely person, but she fully merited her firing this week. She rolled with an unworkable idea and, though Philip forced it through and was horrible to everyone this week, Kim facilitated his idea at every stage and chose to ally with him in the boardroom, which was idiotic. In addition, she was responsible for the crap advert and, the absolutely dire box which only had a front panel on it. I know that the last three tasks have been landslides, but this week was the worst losing effort so far in my view and, for that, I would also probably have fired Philip for forcing his idea through, being aggressive on task, condescending and rude throughout the task and for being pretty aggressive in the boardroom. I don’t know why Lorraine was in firing contention considering she was right all task and it’s not as if she delayed the team significantly. At the end of the day, the end product was terrible all the way through and this was nearly entirely due to Kim and Philip and they deserved to go for that.

Week 6

Who was fired? Noorul
Who should have been fired? Ben
Why? You know what? Ben was so laughably bad in that (admittedly difficult) task and tanked the task so badly that I actually would have fired him to prove that bringing in a human shield (Noorul) doesn’t always save you from a firing. Ben destroyed any chance Empire had by making three key mistakes in the first half hour of the task. Firstly, he failed to read the brief properly so he didn’t understand that the task was about valuation and not about selling. Secondly, he took seven items in an obvious bravado move clearly designed to make him look good and finally, he abandoned his valuation strategy in favour of the worst possible strategy (Sell at any place) after visiting one place which, ultimately cost them the task. In addition to having no leadership at all during the task, he brought in the two people because he knew that Sir Alan was dying to fire one and the other one had just had a row with Nick. I would have fired Ben to prove that these types of boardroom tactics shouldn’t work. Debra actually gained my respect for calling Nick out on his bullshit and, as for Noorul, I think I’d have actually kept him on given it was his best task, he was pretty good in the boardroom and, above all, to tell Ben that he’s worse than Noorul.

Week 7

Who was fired? Philip
Who should have been fired? Philip
Why? Three people sold absolute zero on this task. Yes, Lorraine wasn’t great and Yasmina got a bit of a lucky escape, but as they sold, only the three candidates with zero sales should have been considered for the firing. Of the three, I think Ben has shown the least, but he did get an excellent lead for Lorraine and so he probably did deserve to survive the boardroom this week. I didn’t like Kate trying to defend what was blatantly, a day off but since she has been arguably the strongest candidate so far and she (eventually) admitted her mistakes meant that I think she did deserve to stay. Philip, on the other hand, continued to be a complete and utter dick to Lorraine, saw feedback on listening to Lorraine as an excuse to do nothing, went AWOL in the boardroom and was the person you’d expect to sell the most when he sold nothing. In addition, factor in the fact that his only positive week so far was the Bodyrocka and I think he fully deserved his firing.

Week 8

Who was fired? Mona
Who should have been fired? Debra
Why? Oh, it was a narrow one this week for me and I felt that whoever out of Mona and Debra survived was pretty lucky this week. As far as Mona goes, it was thanks to her that the whole gay theme was diluted and it was evident that she wasn’t keen to get involved once the team had decided to roll with the gay idea. With Debra, her poor time management and organisation pretty well cost Empire the task this week, considering the posters looked atrocious and the leaflet was blatantly unfinished. Also, Debra and Mona were the two people working on the leaflet and therefore, the two people that were responsible for the poor, unfinished content. However, Debra was PM and she should have realised that Mona’s dilution was costing them the task and put her foot down. Not only that, but as PM, she should have been ultimately responsible for the leaflet and the fact that she refused to take on Howard’s (correct) ideas meant that I would have narrowly fired her, albeit with regret.

Week 9

Who was fired? Ben
Who should have been fired? Ben
Why? Considering he should have been fired on each of his three previous boardroom appearances, it is no surprise that I’ve put him down as deserving to be fired on this one, but he was also awful on task as well. He and Debra were the main people who advocated going for the Rocking Horse, which was the main reason behind the task failure, both he and Debra refused to name a back-up product and they both sold nothing at the end of the day. Debra made almost all of the same mistakes as Ben in this task and was more forceful, however, at least she nearly sold the rocking horse and was generally better at selling the products, whilst Ben didn’t come close to making a sale and once again refused to take responsibility. Combine this with the fact that he’s clearly the weakest left, he had reason to be fired on each of his previous boardroom appearances and it was the second sales task in a row that he sold nothing and it was 100% the right decision to fire him.

Week 10

Who was fired? Howard
Who should have been fired? Howard
Why? Difficult one this week and I felt that neither Howard nor Lorraine would win, but I had to give the edge to Lorraine who had shown more genuine sparks of business throughout the entire process, whilst Howard had eased through the entire competition never taking any risks and this completely summed him up on this task. Whilst Lorraine was advocating to go for a highly-expensive but hugely-impressive toy dinosaur, Howard overruled her to try and play it safe. In addition, Howard was clearly the best on TV, but instead allowed Kate the solo slot, when he should have been doing it. Kate’s poor performance on TV was a contributing factor in the defeat and had she been with Lorraine, it could have upped their sales just enough to win. As a losing PM and the fact that the main reasons behind the defeat were his, I felt it was Howard’s time to go.

Week 11

Who was fired? James, Lorraine and Debra
Who should have been fired? Lorraine, Debra and James (In that Order)
Why? The final two are by far the best two in the entire process, so I have no qualms at all with the finalists. However, I do think that the other three should have been fired in a different order. I liked Lorraine, but she quite simply wasn’t in the league of Kate or Yasmina and though she has good business instincts, I think she performed poorly in the interviews and deserved to go. Debra had been up and down throughout the entire process; at times she was very good, but at others, she was utterly appalling and was arguably lucky to avoid getting fired. I don’t think her entire process performance meant that she deserved that final 3 spot or emotional firing and I don’t think she’d have worked in any of Sir Alan’s companies. She would have been my second firing. James had admittedly been poor in the interviews, but he was a decent candidate and I think he was among the best three candidates in the process since Week 3. He led really well both times he was PM (Just unlucky), he was a decent salesman and his general business acumen was surprisingly decent. Yes, he bombed in the interviews, but I felt he deserved a place in the final 3, so he would have been my last firing. Kate and Yasmina have smoked everyone else with their performances in the competition, so they clearly should have been the final 2.

Week 12

Who was hired? Yasmina
Who should have been hired? Yasmina
Why? In reality, no one really outperformed the other on the final task and really, it had to be based on overall performance because of this. At the end of the day, Yasmina blew everyone else away with her brilliant performances throughout the competition and she was one of the most intelligent and pragmatic candidates the show has ever had. From all three of her PM wins to strong selling throughout to being one of the few that actually understood the task in Week 6 to just being a generally excellent, business-savvy candidates, she has stood out all the way through the process and thoroughly deserves the win. Kate is undeniably an outstanding candidate, but she does have her flaws, including a robotic like personality and being someone who couldn’t take criticism, not to mention the fact that she was a major factor in defeats in Weeks 7 and 10 and I think that overall, she was less impressive than Yasmina who had the balls to lead three times in comparison to Kate’s one. It’s a close run thing, but Yasmina is definitely my choice and the first time I agree with Sir Alan in five years!

Week 1 - Mona. It's true that Debra messed up on the classic car job (in addition to generally being a bitch), and Anita was fairly useless, but Mona sabotaged the team right out of the gate by insisting on blowing the whole budget on cleaning supplies, and seemed to be in denial about the mistakes she made.

Week 2 - Rocky. Just made far too many mistakes, including forgetting to keep the costs down, and making a spectacular balls-up with the toga party. Bringing back James and Howard instead of Majid and Noorul was another big error, though I don't think bringing back the latter two would have saved him.

Week 3 - Majid. Going into the boardroom I'd have actually said it was equal between all three, as James was too hands-off as a leader, Ben designed a bad product, and Majid's only contribution was suggesting the "joke-of-all-trades" design. Ultimately though, James and Ben really fought for their lives in the boardroom, while Majid did an absolutely terrible job of defending himself.

Week 4 - Paula. This may well be the hardest firing decision in the show's entire history, as all three in the boardroom were responsible for the Sandalwood cock-up, and the person who blatantly deserved to be fired was the project manager of the winning team. In the end though, Ben was probably the least at fault of the three, and Yasmina was already emerging as the front-runner, so Paula had to take responsibility as the overall leader of the team.

Week 5 - Kim. Even accounting for the fact that Pantsman was a last-minute replacement for an unseen idea, she was a weak leader all-around, and while Lorraine had undoubtedly been a pain in the arse, either Mona (for the bad presentation) or Noorul (for being Noorul) should have been in the boardroom instead. On top of that, Kim seemed to think she was auditioning for a high-school play rather than defending herself in the boardroom.

Week 6 - Noorul and Debra. Noorul's a given, as he was just useless beyond belief. Debra I think crossed a serious line when she blew up at Nick in the boardroom; that for me showed that she didn't respect authority and was unwilling to consider she might be wrong about anything, both fatal character flaws IMO.

Week 7 - Philip. He'd really fallen apart in the last three tasks, while Kate was clearly the strongest candidate of the three in the boardroom, and Lorraine had shown that she somewhat understood how to run a sales task, so between that and his arrogance, Philip was really the one who had to go.

Week 8 - Debra. Bullied her way into the project manager's role when it was obvious Howard was better suited for this sort of task, lied about the incomplete brochure, and then refused to take any responsibility for the task's failure.

Week 9 - Ben. Close call between all three in the boardroom, but Ben just seemed to have run out of steam this week.

Week 10 - Howard. A difficult decision, but it was his and Lorraine's atrocious sales figures which caused their team to fail, and Howard not only made questionable decisions in product selection, but basically admitted in the boardroom that he wasn't what Sugar was looking for.

Week 11 - Lorraine, James and Debra. Across the board, they were clearly weaker than Yasmina and Kate, and their personalities for various reasons simply wouldn't have gelled with Sugar's organization.

Week 12 - Yasmina should have been hired. Both finalists were very good, but across the board Yasmina was the better of the two pretty much throughout the series.

Ben was quite clearly not to blame for Paula and Yasmina getting mixed up between Cedarwood oil with Sandalwood oil. Nor was he to blame for Paula and Yasmina going off by themselves and doing the costings themselves. As Yasmina said in the board room she either had to do it herself or deligate, and when Paula claimed she did, as Yasmina said she didn't properly.

If Paula really wanted Ben to do the costings she should have made it clearer rather than doing it herself and messing it up. "Ben can you do the costings, and I'll carry on with this," would have been so simple to say, if she was unsure of anything. Mixing up 3% and 3 grams, and being unable to read a simple table, is unforgiveable.

Fine, but she did delegate it to him. Sorry, but he deserved at least some blame for the cock-up. Probably not as much as Yasmina or Paula, but he deserved blame all the same. As I saw it, since all three deserved blame for it, I think that it had to come down to past performance. Yasmina smoked both of them there (she already had a PM victory to her name) whilst Paula had been otherwise excellent on the task. Ben on the other hand, had done nothing decent of note in the first four weeks and deserved thoroughly to get fired in Week 3.

I don't really subscribe to the theory that Paula had to go no matter what in Week 4. As she was a terrific PM, it was such a shame to lose her over an error that anyone could have made.

I've always thought Yasmina deserved to go that week.

I understand why people think Ben should take the blame, because he could've been on top of costing before or during the picking of the scents, instead of getting an attack of manliness. However in costing the finalised product all he could've done is spot the mistake, they would still have been in the same boat.

I think she'd have deserved to go had it been the first task. As it was, she'd done an exemplary job in the first three tasks, including a very impressive PM win on Task 2. Even on that task, it wasn't as if she'd entered the task with utterly the wrong strategy or anything; she just made an accidental mathematical error that messed up the task. Everyone has done that at some point - you feel really stupid afterwards, but it's just a mistake and as it's a job interview, a mistake like that doesn't signify someone's overall suitability to be the employee, especially if they've generally been really strong. I think it's fair that she was given another chance, and as things played out that was the right decision to make, because she didn't make any more mistakes like that in the whole series.

By the same token, shouldn't Paula have been given a pass? Don't agree that someone HAD to go for the error, as I said, I think that as they were all partially culpable for the error, it should have been down to overall performance and in that case, Yasmina certainly shouldn't have gone and probably not Paula either.

In fairness it was an utter shame the team lost, they had the superior product, and bounced back to sell their socks off once they realised the problem. IMO it should've been the one and only time I can think of that a free pass was given to all of those in the boardroom. Unfortunately one had to go, and I still think Paula had more to offer.

So I'd say judging on task alone I'd have fired Yasmina, based on overall I'd have fired Ben, and based on what should have been I'd have fired Noorul.

I think that had the team only narrowly lost out, Sugar might have decided to let them all stay, bearing in mind that they had started the series a man down. But since they had finished about £500 behind the other team and made a loss, someone was always going to take the chop.

In retrospect though, it was really the one time where Sugar would have been perfectly justified in pulling a Gordon Ramsay and firing someone from the winning team.

Yes, but if I was to rank them in order, I would certainly be more inclined towards firing Paula than Yasmina because of Yasmina's track record. Paula hadn't necessarily been bad in tasks, but she hadn't particularly stood out either, even if she was a pretty good team leader in this one. Yasmina, on the other hand, had been very impressive in all of the tasks up until that point and was probably already on the radar as a potential winner. Overall, I may agree with you that Ben should have been the one to go, but I haven't seen this series in a long time, and I think I'd need to re-watch it before I make a final judgement on that.

It would be interesting to hear your thoughts on Series 6 and Junior Apprentice, both of which currently have threads up to discuss the firings for each week.

1. Anita - she didn't seem to be very helpful either practically or with keeping eye on costs.

2. Rocky- no idea how he was as bad as he was given he has catering business, it was an absolute shambles.

3. James- didn't oversee the product design on a product design task, obviously that would define win or loss of task.

4. Ben - perhaps unfairly but he yet again didn't want to be responsible for costings as he could have been in previous tasks. It wasn't really his fault for the massive error but the other two ladies had shown some strengths where I don't think he had.

5. Philip - so immature, absolutely buldozed the idea and intimidated and bullied the rest of the team causing them to just crash and burn.

6. Ben and Noorul - Ben failed to understand what task was about and Noorul was responsible for the big errors. Debra was very rude but she was only one talking sense on having better strategy.

7. Philip - it seemed to me he took a day off and then in boardroom may as well just have walked out himself by the way he got on.

8. Debra- the poor time management and messy campaign idea.

9. Ben- didn't seem to even come close to selling anything and forced through the horses.

10. Lorraine - her pitch wasn't good and didn't prepare her product. Howard was the best presenter I thought so was surprised he went.

11. James, Lorraine and Kate - I liked Kate but felt the other two were more suited to Lord Sugar.

12. Yasmina - I couldn't understand why she wanted the job when she had a restaurant but thought she was the best by the end of it.

I see your point on Noorul, but in regards to Debra, Nick was completely wrong about the task and trying to give credit to Ben when Debra had probably been the best on task for Empire that week. It seemed suspiciously like favouritism or bias against Debra from previous tasks and it just seemed unfair. I'm not surprised that someone as fiery and (occasionally) emotional as Debra snapped at what was essentially a lie seemingly to discredit her. I lost far more respect for Nick in that exchange than I did for Debra.

What I don't understand is why the edit made it clear that Debra had done far more than Ben. I tend to find that the overall style of the show means that Alan Sugar, Nick, Margaret and Karren are supposed to come across as being in the right, at the expense of the candidates. Obviously this can't always be the case, but that is generally the way that the show is edited. I don't understand why those actual scenes weren't briefly glossed over in the edit to give the impression that Nick was correct about the course of events.

For me the problem was that her response seemed completely disproportionate to the situation. Debra was insulting Ben and bragging about selling more than the rest of the team combined, when Nick made a comment about how Ben had been involved in one sale. Not trying to claim that he had made the sale rather than Debra, mind, just saying that he had been a part of it. Debra's response - at least if things happened as the edit depicted, which I'll concede they may not have done - was to immediately go off on one at Nick, and then lash out at the rest of the team for good measure. Contrast that with the way that Noorul (yes, him) managed to politely disagree when Nick actually did say that Ben closed a deal over him.

Week 1
Who was fired? Anita
Who should have been fired? Anita
Why? Because she was in charge of finance/spending, and she should have recognized that they had spent too much - the overspending is what lost them the task.

Week 2
Who was fired? Rocky
Who should have been fired? Rocky
Why? Because he was a bit spineless as a leader. Furthermore, he brought in the wrong people - should have been Noorul (for his lack of contribution) and Majid (for coming up with that horrible theme)

Week 3
Who was fired? Majid
Who should have been fired? James
Why? Because as another poster pointed out, he should have been there at the design of the product - it is ludicrous that he wasn't. He was only marginally worse than Maj though.

Week 4
Who was fired? Paula
Who should have been fired? Paula
Why? Yes, she delegated the finance to Yasmina and Ben, but Paula was there, and overlooking it, and therefore, as the PM, the buck stops with her IMO.

Week 5
Who was fired? Kimberly
Who should have been fired? Kimberly
Why? She let Philip push the awful pantsman idea through... I think Mona should have been in the boardroom though above Lorraine... Her pitch really wasn't great.

Week 6
Who was fired? Noorul
Who should have been fired? Noorul
Why? I needn't explain.

Week 7
Who was fired? Philip
Who should have been fired? Philip
Why? Lorraine wasn't a bad PM, and she and Yasmina were the only people who made any sales. So, it was between Ben, Kate and Philip - Ben had secured a pitch at Pets at Home, and Kate had a lot of potential, adn so it was Philip's time to leave the process IMO.

Week 8
Who was fired? Mona
Who should have been fired? James
Why? All people in the boardroom had good reasons to go, but I think Mona had a lot of potential... She'd done really well in the last task, and James had stayed in the background for most of the process, not least this task.

Week 9
Who was fired? Ben
Who should have been fired? Ben
Why? James led his team much better than the last time, and on this occasion, I feel Ben was the weakest link in the team.

Week 10
Who was fired? Howard
Who should have been fired? Lorraine
Why? Lorraine was marginally worse than Howard... She was pretty bad on the screen in this task... Yes Howard was a bit cautious, but this was a very difficult decision because I think this was the strongest final six ever... So it does have to come down to Lorraine for that reason on this occasion.

Week 11
Who was fired? James, Lorraine and Debra.
Who should have been fired? James, Lorraine and Debra
Why? I don't think I really need to explain this... Yasmina and Kate were the best finalists ever, very worthy.

Week 12
Who was hired? Yasmina
WHo should have been hired? Yasmina
Why? She had been a consistent performer throughout the process. She literally didn't had a bad week, and had proved herself in near enough every facet of business.