• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Doctor Who
Day Of The Doctor Love it or Hate it?
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
daveycrocket222
03-06-2014
Originally Posted by adams66:
“Both online and in terms of viewing figures, the 2013 episodes were clearly successful.
Personally they weren't my favourites, and Matt Smith isn't my favourite Doctor either, so I'm no Smith apologist, but I'm happy to accept that Smith, Moffat's tenure as producer and the whole 50th anniversary shebang has been a big success for the show and for the BBC.
Doctor Who is successful because a lot of people like it. And most of those people don't bother with forums and message boards and online polls. Trying to invent conspiracies to explain the success of the something you don't like seems pointless to me.”

ITS NOT A FLAMMING CONSPIRACY!

People have fixed online polls before. I have personally seen it happen before!!!!!!!
CD93
03-06-2014
Then it was a conspiracy to fix an online poll.
be more pacific
03-06-2014
Originally Posted by daveycrocket222:
“ITS NOT A FLAMMING CONSPIRACY!

People have fixed online polls before. I have personally seen it happen before!!!!!!! ”

You still haven't produced a shred of evidence that anything untoward happened in this particular poll. You still haven't given a credible motive for why people would bother to rig a poll for an episode when its success or failure would be assessed by more scientific means?
DiscoP
03-06-2014
Originally Posted by daveycrocket222:
“ITS NOT A FLAMMING CONSPIRACY!

People have fixed online polls before. I have personally seen it happen before!!!!!!! ”

I'm not sure that I see what the problem is....

Fine, you clearly didn't enjoy The Day of the Doctor, be content with your own non-enjoyment of it but stop trying to convince yourself that everyone else feels the same way. I wouldn't expect everyone else to like or dislike the same things as me.
johnnysaucepn
03-06-2014
Originally Posted by WhoFan55:
“I'm going to have to respectfully disagree. I don't see the Paul McGann Doctor being this great romantic. Yes, he's good-looking, wore old-fashioned clothes that he looked great in and had a brief romance with Grace but I don't see him as being more romantic than the 10th Doctor. Furthermore, I think it's safe to say that many people who went off to WWI and WWII were changed by their experiences and what they went through and also found themselves doing things they wouldn't have done before.”

I would suggest that transforming the incarnation in this way would probably rub some people up the wrong way - they might not want 'their' Doctor to be turned into a shell-shocked warrior.

Originally Posted by WhoFan55:
“I also didn't get the impression that the Hurt Doctor was "battle-scarred", more like he needed a good night's sleep after being up too late watching television. Certainly I didn't look at him and see this great warrior, like some kind of Rambo who is now winding down.”

Yep, that's exactly it. He's a general who's tired of the fighting, who's been putting off this final action for a long time.

Quote:
“"It would have been credible had the War Doctor actually lived up to the sense of dread and foreboding that hung around him in his appearance at the end of "The Name of the Doctor" but by the time he came to DOTD the lion had turned into a kitten and he does nothing that another Doctor would not have."”

I though the foreboding and dread was supposed to be about the act that he committed, not his personal presence. Even in his first teaser, he wasn't threatening, he was almost pleading.
The_abbott
03-06-2014
Thought it was crap. Didn't like it - but then I'm a traditionalist. Capaldi is the 12th Doctor for me so has one more life left!

Paul McGann should have been the War Doctor. Moffatt just wanted to be the guy to sort out the regeneration quota issue. Having McGann would have tied it up nicely as a 50th anniversary show not just Tennant and Smith larking about aimlessly.

Ecclestone's season is still the hilight for NuWho for me. Oh and don't give me the "ratings are still good so it must be good". 18 million people watched Neighbours once. It was still crap!
johnnysaucepn
03-06-2014
Originally Posted by The_abbott:
“Moffatt just wanted to be the guy to sort out the regeneration quota issue.”

Did he? Did he really?
sebbie3000
03-06-2014
Originally Posted by The_abbott:
“Thought it was crap. Didn't like it - but then I'm a traditionalist. Capaldi is the 12th Doctor for me so has one more life left!

Paul McGann should have been the War Doctor. Moffatt just wanted to be the guy to sort out the regeneration quota issue. Having McGann would have tied it up nicely as a 50th anniversary show not just Tennant and Smith larking about aimlessly.

Ecclestone's season is still the hilight for NuWho for me. Oh and don't give me the "ratings are still good so it must be good". 18 million people watched Neighbours once. It was still crap!”

Well, the ratings are still good.

But it's the AI (appreciation Index) that judges whether a show is good or not.

And, surprisingly, the AI has stayed consistent since it came back.

Also, just because you don't like something, doesn't make it crap. To think that is extremely arrogant.
Tony Tiger
03-06-2014
Originally Posted by johnnysaucepn:
“Did he? Did he really?”

Well yeah, obviously! He contrived things to make it so!
adams66
03-06-2014
Originally Posted by The_abbott:
“Ecclestone's season is still the hilight for NuWho for me. Oh and don't give me the "ratings are still good so it must be good". 18 million people watched Neighbours once. It was still crap!”

Err, no, not really. I don't watch Neighbours, but any internationally successful tv series that's been running for 25+ years must surely be considered a success, regardless of your own personal views on its quality. You don't like Neighbours, that's fine. Neither do I. But I would never have the arrogance to unilaterally declare it to be 'crap' - it's merely something that I don't like. There's a big difference.
davrosdodebird
03-06-2014
Originally Posted by Tony Tiger:
“Well yeah, obviously! He contrived things to make it so!”

Yes but at least in doing so he addressed the issue of 10's non-regeneration in The Stolen Earth, for all us pedants out there.

And Abbott you can believe what you like, just don't run in here screaming and crying when Capaldi's successor regenerates and you aren't given a reason as to why the Doctor didn't die. We'll just tell you that the explanation was in Time of the Doctor.

And yes, Capaldi is #12.

1st Doctor
2nd Doctor
3rd Doctor
4th Doctor
5th Doctor
6th Doctor
7th Doctor
8th Doctor
John Hurt -- not "The Doctor" in his own eyes
9th Doctor
10th Doctor
10th Doctor again + metacrisis Doctor
11th Doctor - 13th life.

12th Doctor - new regen cycle.

He's the 12th distinctly different looking/ sounding/ personality wise incarnation of the Time Lord who chooses to be called the Doctor. This is why Capaldi is STILL being billed as #12! Or haven't you noticed?
donovan5
03-06-2014
I would rather they'd used McGann instead of the War Doctor,they could have still run much the same story with 8th hiding Gallifrey to keep it safe but then going to see those witches and forcing a regeneration with the drink which would also make him forget the action to stop a future Doctor exposing the secret and putting Gallifrey in danger.

It was still an enjoyable episode though.
be more pacific
04-06-2014
Originally Posted by The_abbott:
“Thought it was crap. Didn't like it - but then I'm a traditionalist. Capaldi is the 12th Doctor for me so has one more life left!”

How does that work? Does your personal belief somehow trump a major plot point which was explained unequivocally on-screen?
adams66
04-06-2014
Originally Posted by be more pacific:
“How does that work? Does your personal belief somehow trump a major plot point which was explained unequivocally on-screen?”

I think you're right be more pacific.
I could understand the confusion, or the reason for any debate if the plot point wasn't clear, but it is clear.
There are none so blind as those that refuse to see...
CD93
04-06-2014
Originally Posted by The_abbott:
“Thought it was crap. Didn't like it - but then I'm a traditionalist. Capaldi is the 12th Doctor for me so has one more life left”

Absolute post of the year so far.
adams66
04-06-2014
Originally Posted by CD93:
“Absolute post of the year so far.”

Really? I thought it was crap. Didn't like it.

sebbie3000
04-06-2014
Originally Posted by adams66:
“Really? I thought it was crap. Didn't like it.

”

Haha! Lol...
The_abbott
04-06-2014
Originally Posted by be more pacific:
“How does that work? Does your personal belief somehow trump a major plot point which was explained unequivocally on-screen?”

I'm not happy with the explanation. That is my opinion and I stick to it. Too much fiddling around and timewimey for me. Capaldi is the 12th Doctor.

War Doctor does not exist
fake Tennant isn't a regeneration
The_abbott
04-06-2014
Originally Posted by davrosdodebird:
“Yes but at least in doing so he addressed the issue of 10's non-regeneration in The Stolen Earth, for all us pedants out there.

And Abbott you can believe what you like, just don't run in here screaming and crying when Capaldi's successor regenerates and you aren't given a reason as to why the Doctor didn't die. We'll just tell you that the explanation was in Time of the Doctor.
”

I will probably stop watching because the Doctor would have used all his lifes

I can then go back and watch from the start again.
The_abbott
04-06-2014
Originally Posted by adams66:
“Err, no, not really. I don't watch Neighbours, but any internationally successful tv series that's been running for 25+ years must surely be considered a success, regardless of your own personal views on its quality. You don't like Neighbours, that's fine. Neither do I. But I would never have the arrogance to unilaterally declare it to be 'crap' - it's merely something that I don't like. There's a big difference.”

So everything that is long running is good? The Dr Who cash cow ran out of milk yonks ago. They are now draining the poor cow's blood. The writing isn't as good anymore as there is a over reliance on either the screwdriver, timeywimey lets not bother to explain stuff, the over importance of the companion. The same with Neighbours or any other long running show i.e Simpsons. Same old storylines being rehashed. The quality of most TV writing has dipped. That is my opinion and people can beg to differ if they like and enjoy the show as much as I used too
be more pacific
04-06-2014
Originally Posted by The_abbott:
“I'm not happy with the explanation. That is my opinion and I stick to it. Too much fiddling around and timewimey for me. Capaldi is the 12th Doctor.

War Doctor does not exist
fake Tennant isn't a regeneration”

Well, you're welcome to your imaginary canon. Just don't expect other people to acknowledge your version when the last three broadcast episodes (and a minisode) have all explicitly stated that the War Doctor is an actual incarnation of the Doctor in all but name.
daveycrocket222
04-06-2014
Originally Posted by be more pacific:
“Well, you're welcome to your imaginary canon. Just don't expect other people to acknowledge your version when the last three broadcast episodes (and a minisode) have all explicitly stated that the War Doctor is an actual incarnation of the Doctor in all but name.”

Only because Moffatt decided to rush everything because he wanted to be the one to do the new regenerations thing.

Maybe the next producer will change it.
CD93
04-06-2014
Originally Posted by adams66:
“Really? I thought it was crap. Didn't like it.

”

Oh, well if it's going to be like that - we better start a poll for the Best Doctor Who Forum Post of the Year so far on Digital Spy.

I promise not to create multiple accounts if you don't.
be more pacific
05-06-2014
Originally Posted by daveycrocket222:
“Only because Moffatt decided to rush everything because he wanted to be the one to do the new regenerations thing.

Maybe the next producer will change it.”

Change it in what way? Seeing as the War Doctor led to everything that happened in the last seven series, what you're suggesting is very close to DariaM's constant calls for all of New Who to be written-off as a bad dream.
daveycrocket222
06-06-2014
Originally Posted by be more pacific:
“Change it in what way? Seeing as the War Doctor led to everything that happened in the last seven series, what you're suggesting is very close to DariaM's constant calls for all of New Who to be written-off as a bad dream.”

Well that wouldnt be a bad idea.
<<
<
3 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map