• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
Results:Did the twist shock you tonight?
Yes, I was shocked
107 (58.15%)
No, it was predictable
77 (41.85%)
Voters: 184. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in?
CORRIE: Did the twist shock you?
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
sorrento
29-05-2014
Originally Posted by scone:
“It wasn't unexpected so therefore it wasn't a twist, a twist would have been someone else finishing her off as already posted.”

Personally I think that would have ruined the whole story and the stories which follow on from this..
scone
29-05-2014
Originally Posted by sorrento:
“Personally I think that would have ruined the whole story and the stories which follow on from this..”

I think it would have been better without the "twist" she falls, she never recovers, a man racked with guilt, rather than this regurgitated Tracy storyline, isn't that what she did to Charlie? Got a bit angry and grabbed the nearest thing and whalloped him?
Fudd
29-05-2014
Originally Posted by ArthurJBear:
“Well considering she didn't fall far, it was reported someone would kill her,we know she ends up in hospital, we knew that the killer was throwing a 'weapon' away, we knew a 'twist' would happen in the first few minutes, and the preview saw Carla threatening to 'kill' her I think it was obvious that what happened would happen. The only way it would have been a shock twist would have been if if Rob scarpered after pushing her and someone else did her in.

If Corrie wanted Rob to kill her then they could have had one of the other suspects push her, run away and then have Rob do the deed.”

I think people would then accuse Stuart Blackburn of repeating his greatest hit (no pun intended) of Chas hitting Carl but Cameron finishing him off. It had to be slightly different this time around.
Fudd
29-05-2014
Originally Posted by scone:
“I think it would have been better without the "twist" she falls, she never recovers, a man racked with guilt, rather than this regurgitated Tracy storyline, isn't that what she did to Charlie? Got a bit angry and grabbed the nearest thing and whalloped him?”

Tracey planned Charlie's murder for weeks to the extent that she created an image of being in an abusive relationship to Claire so she had an 'alibi' when she did the deed. It was cold blooded whereas Rob was opportunistic.

Re. The cutaway to the champagne cork and others mentioning Maxine's murder cutting to the meat being carved - the other one I recall is John Stape bludgeoning Charlotte with a hammer cutting away to the wreath falling off the front door. I think.some people thought it was Charlotte's head dropping onto the street at the time!
AndreaMC
29-05-2014
Originally Posted by scone:
“I think it would have been better without the "twist" she falls, she never recovers, a man racked with guilt, rather than this regurgitated Tracy storyline, isn't that what she did to Charlie? Got a bit angry and grabbed the nearest thing and whalloped him?”

That's not what happened re Tracey. She premeditated Charlie's murder by having everything ready beforehand, then inviting him round to talk and then trying to seduce him before she battered him.
Also she never suffered from any remorse or guilt over it,
But then of course she isn't human, And I suppose that's why the courts decided not to try her as one,lol.
kitkat1971
29-05-2014
Not really as I couldn( think of what else it could be once we'd been tolf there was going to be twist. I never really bought the ideaa of somebody aside from the 4 announced suspects being the killer. Then as soon as we heard her moan as Rob was leaving it appeared obvious.

Had they not announced there was going to be a twist, I think I'd have been shocked.
scone
29-05-2014
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“Tracey planned Charlie's murder for weeks to the extent that she created an image of being in an abusive relationship to Claire so she had an 'alibi' when she did the deed. It was cold blooded whereas Rob was opportunistic.

Re. The cutaway to the champagne cork and others mentioning Maxine's murder cutting to the meat being carved - the other one I recall is John Stape bludgeoning Charlotte with a hammer cutting away to the wreath falling off the front door. I think.some people thought it was Charlotte's head dropping onto the street at the time! ”

Ahhh I see, but did she plan on hitting him with that ornament? I remember it being on the table, was it always her plan to do him in with that thing or was it just something that came to hand?

To be honest I can't even remember Fudd haha, but thanks for filling me in


Originally Posted by AndreaMC:
“That's not what happened re Tracey. She premeditated Charlie's murder by having everything ready beforehand, then inviting him round to talk and then trying to seduce him before she battered him.
Also she never suffered from any remorse or guilt over it,
But then of course she isn't human, And I suppose that's why the courts decided not to try her as one,lol.”

I know she never had remorse over it, she's a bit like that one with the chin there, Tracie Andrews. But then again Tracy B never concocted a story about fictional road rage like Tracie A, nasty piece of work
Selena
29-05-2014
I didn't think that it was predictable but I also wasn't shocked if that makes sense.
Eurostar
29-05-2014
Originally Posted by mr trebus:
“Why cant no one in tv land dispose of a murder weapon..

i get rid of all mine...”

I can't see how Carla would be in the frame for this btw. Tina was beaten with a metal object but there's no such object in the flat above and no blood either and none on Carla.....you would think they would eliminate her from their inquiries immediately.
Evilredzebra
29-05-2014
I was shocked at how bad it was. Tina got up and almost dusted herself off as if she'd tripped on her high heels. And Rob's reaction was ridiculous. He didn't push her off the balcony so even if the permatanned nutter had called the police she didn't have a case against him. He'd have been better off calling an ambulance (not that she needed one by the look of her) and then getting onto Tracy to dispose of the evidence of dodgy business dealings.
Belligerence
29-05-2014
Originally Posted by alienpanda:
“She's not dead yet

Spoiler
She dies on Monday's - so it coudl be someone else yet - suffocate her, turn the machine off etc etc
”

I really hope it doesn't come to that, a la Karl/Sunita.

Where are the flaming doctors and nurses checking up on the patients?!
LadyIvory
29-05-2014
I was shocked, really didn't see it coming. I thought once she hit the ground she was a goner. Never expected her to still be alive, and certainly didn't expect Rob to bash her head in
Matthew_Howarth
29-05-2014
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“Tracey planned Charlie's murder for weeks to the extent that she created an image of being in an abusive relationship to Claire so she had an 'alibi' when she did the deed. It was cold blooded whereas Rob was opportunistic.

Re. The cutaway to the champagne cork and others mentioning Maxine's murder cutting to the meat being carved - the other one I recall is John Stape bludgeoning Charlotte with a hammer cutting away to the wreath falling off the front door. I think.some people thought it was Charlotte's head dropping onto the street at the time! ”

Right - thanks for the descriptions of the cutaways in your Re.

Corrie always seems to do this and now has a history of doing the quick cutaways. Quite clever I think to do this - I don't recall the Charlotte one but do remember the Maxine one with the meat being carved.

The champagne cork popping was similar in terms of the speed at the cutaway from the crucial moment (which for obvious reasons, Corrie can't actually show on TV, as it actually happens).
TheGraduate2012
29-05-2014
I just want to know how someone could actually suffer a fall like that and have NO sign of physical injury? Also, won't the police be able to tell from where Tina was lying (when she was found) that it wasn't the fall that killed her? She looked too far into the pavement, instead of out onto the street, like when she actually fell. I don't know if that makes sense but I'd thought it'd be pretty obvious Carla didn't push her.
wwinterj
29-05-2014
I'm more shocked she's still alive.
<<
<
4 of 4
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map