• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
Is EastEnders appealling less and less to under 25s?
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
Hildaonpluto
07-11-2015
Originally Posted by TeekyPie:
“I'm 22 and I love eastenders, have grown up with it though. None of my immediate friendship group watch it.”

I think that's an increasingly common experience. When I was a teenager the majority of my peers watched the soaps or dropped in as a casual viewer for a nose but so much has changed since then -so much choice and so much more on offer to the young!
attitude99
07-11-2015
Only a few of my friends watch EastEnders properly, and the rest don't at all.

Over the last few weeks though it's appealed less to me, I'm finding it really boring with this whole Gavin/Kathy thing, the few episodes I've missed I haven't bothered catching up on which is a first as I used to.
Tony_Daniels
07-11-2015
It doesn't seem to have that many positive examples of young people.

Stacey is had it away with her best friend's (now) husband and is carrying his baby, Lee and Nancy still live at home and are effectively still children, Ben's s hiding in the closet, Abi's in denial, Jay just hangs about at Phils.

There aren't many 'successful' or independent under 30s in the show at all.
Hildaonpluto
07-11-2015
Originally Posted by Tony_Daniels:
“It doesn't seem to have that many positive examples of young people.

Stacey is had it away with her best friend's (now) husband and is carrying his baby, Lee and Nancy still live at home and are effectively still children, Ben's s hiding in the closet, Abi's in denial, Jay just hangs about at Phils.

There aren't many 'successful' or independent under 30s in the show at all.”

Perhaps the truth is despite how trendy the EE team may or may not believe they are that they simply don't know how to write interesting realistic young characters as much as they think they do?
Pink_Smurf
07-11-2015
Originally Posted by Hildaonpluto:
“Perhaps the truth is despite how trendy the EE team may or may not believe they are that they simply don't know how to write interesting realistic young characters as much as they think they do?”

I think you're right. I think they need some younger writers. I have a feeling one or two (maybe more) writers have been there since the 1980s. I'd like new younger characters, maybe two friends of Nancy's who have a flat share in Albert Square and have just moved in for example.
vald
07-11-2015
Originally Posted by Hildaonpluto:
“Perhaps the truth is despite how trendy the EE team may or may not believe they are that they simply don't know how to write interesting realistic young characters as much as they think they do?”

They've gone from having a bunch of young people getting drunk, partying and failing exams to young people who are old before their time and hang out with their parents all the time.
Hildaonpluto
07-11-2015
Originally Posted by vald:
“They've gone from having a bunch of young people getting drunk, partying and failing exams to young people who are old before their time and hang out with their parents all the time.”

It does make me wonder how many young people the writers know properly in real life!
vald
07-11-2015
Originally Posted by Hildaonpluto:
“It does make me wonder how many young people the writers know properly in real life!”

I'd guess none. Or at least they don't have teenage children. They all hang around in the lounge like it's still the 50s instead of taking themselves off to their rooms or hanging around the park or café with their mates.....not that any of them have mates anymore.
Ell_Ren
07-11-2015
I prefer the focus on the 25+ characters. (besides Jay, who I wish would be given a storyline..)
joe gillott
07-11-2015
Originally Posted by DUNDEEBOY:
“The ratings aren't soaring though

It still can't get the balance right either

If it features too many older characters it gains older fans but loss younger ones.

It it features too many younger characters it gains younger fans but loses older ones.

This is why I feel the viewing figures are still fairly static”

Couldn't agree more.
Tony_Daniels
07-11-2015
The roles of Ronnie, Roxie - two people who are early to mid 40s, should be being portrayed by characters in their late 20s/early 30s. Same with Kat an Alfie, a middle aged couple playing a 'young couple'
Brad_Adamson
07-11-2015
I'm 25 now and I've watched it religiously since I was 4 or 5... my parents didn't even introduce me to it, it was my own discovery that I've stuck with for my whole life.
IWasBored
08-11-2015
When was this?
Hildaonpluto
10-11-2015
Originally Posted by IWasBored:
“When was this?”

Pardon? Who is your question directed to please and concerning what?
TheGraduate2012
10-11-2015
Speaking as a recently-turned 25, in my experience the soaps don't really resonant with people my age and younger anymore - glossy TV dramas and reality shows rule all. Unless you're like me and the people on here who are really into soaps. I think a lot of young people grew up watching them with their parents but didn't become hardcore fans themselves, and now only tune in for the 'big' episodes. But the soaps have become more a lot more niche all round and I actually don't think that has much to do with age - even middle-aged people are either really into them or just not arsed.
<<
<
3 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map