Originally Posted by Hit Em Up Style:
“I never claimed it was numerically impossible for Hollyoaks to win best soap. I claimed it was impossible for it to have won without multiple votes if 3 million votes had been cast for best soap. You were the one who made that into a big thing creating thread after thread on the subject just for my benefit. That has no baring on this topic.
Patsy's first break from EE in 2010 happened earlier than planned (two weeks to be exact) because her unborn baby was ill and was born premature. That isn't the tptb indulging her. After her miscarriage Patsy slipped into depression. Her comments about ''maybe not returning'' as she only wanted to be at home with her kids were because of her depression. She was ill at the time. This was two months before her planned return. All this was from her own mouth and can be found by any Google search. Other than these two breaks from EE (late 2010 and 2011 respectfully) she hasn't had any time off that other actors haven't had. So again this isn't her bosses indulging her. Holidays form part of everyone's contract who is in employment and every regular cast member at EE gets the same amount of holidays per year. This if you want proof this is in the BBC Trust's report into BBC Continuing Drama. And as for the US offer. She was approached by an America director who screen tested her for a drama. As she was on leave from EE why shouldn't have gone for it? Patsy always said she would return to EE once the time was right and she lived up to her promise by returning in late 2011.
Like I said. Patsy is the fourth most appeared EE actor this year and was the fifth most appeared in 2013. Hardly a sign of someone who is always off on breaks. You can't really argue with the episode stats.
If you have inside goss that they bent over backwards just to please and in your words ''indulge'' Patsy and constantly give her time off then do share the info instead of just posting your opinion on that you think happened.
I will always defend Patsy on DS as I think she gets a rough deal on here. Letitia Dean must only be on a semi recurring contract at EE going off how little she appears yet you never hear people saying the show is indulging her.”
If 3 million people voted as claimed by you IF I think youll find you posted far more on the subject than me and I assure you no thread was started by me with you specifically in mind.
Indulge and bent over backwards are not quite the same thing.You might want to dictionary check the meaning of the word indulge.
As for depression as someone whos had personal experience of this all I can say is I dont understand how Patsy could have negotiated a 6 month onscreen break from feb/march 2012 onwards if that was the case.Depression is a very volatile and unpredictable illness and theres no way anyone could negotiate and say with confidence Im not well enough to work fully atm but 6 months from now I will be able to return to work and it will be ok.Depression doesnt work like that and Patsy wouldnt have been in a position to give that assurance.But then I cant find anything online were Patsy has said her 6 month break was because of depression,its only you saying that.
As for the american offer,you say Patsy said shed return to EastEnders when the time was right.I think you mean shed return when her other offers fell through because going by the timing its obvious thats what happened!
Given the number of times Patsy did djing work,gave magazine interviews,attended celeb bashes ,red carpet events and partied in Ibiza for extended periods with Sid Owen during her 6 month break then I suggest gently to you that I think your mistaken in implying her 6 month break was because of depression and being unable to take on duties as a result.
I think the indulgence mainly comes in the form of Bianca being seen as a character whos legendary and whod theyd always have back.I think a Bianca murder storyline would have been much braver than murdering Lucy Beale while shes played by a poor actress.
As for Letitia Dean shes been anything but indulged since 2012.
PS Under no circumstances did I ever imply maternity leave was an indulgence or part of what I was refering too.I specifically mentioned she let her maternity leave lapse into being out of contract later on.