7 or 8 million for this match tonight?? Pretty dull so far - a few shots on goal...I can see the Tiger show dropping 0.5m, Endeavour repeat under 3 million.
The Ratings Thread (Part 60)
111 of 351
Originally Posted by burbe:
“Does anyone know what date the schedule is decided for the knockout stages?
Indeed, we'll have to wait for the paper schedules.”
“Does anyone know what date the schedule is decided for the knockout stages?
Indeed, we'll have to wait for the paper schedules.”
I'm not sure when it'll be sorted. We might find the Saturday/Sunday schedules are decided before the Monday/Tuesday ones.
Maybe the Radio Times website will opt for the other versions of the schedules.
Originally Posted by SamuelW:
“Surprising that Germany v Portugal didnt rate better yesterday. Its 4.51m/33.5pct was less than what Columbia v Greece got on BBC1 [4.57/34.3pct] which is much lower profile game.”
“Surprising that Germany v Portugal didnt rate better yesterday. Its 4.51m/33.5pct was less than what Columbia v Greece got on BBC1 [4.57/34.3pct] which is much lower profile game.”
ITV's match had half an hour more build-up, depressing the rating. Interestingly the total TV audience was slightly higher on Monday than Saturday, even though Monday was a workday for most, and the coverage started earlier than on Saturday as well.
BBC One
Saturday
16:30-19:10 - Columbia v Greece: 4.57m / (34.3%) = 13.3m total TV audience
ITV (inc +1 )
Monday
16:00-19:10 - Germany v Portugal: 4.51m / (33.5%) = 13.5m total TV audience
Plus, as already pointed out to you by Steve in relation to another comparison you made, ITV's broadcast faced a new episode of Pointless and the strong 6pm news hour, whereas BBC One's on Saturday was competing with three repeats of LE shows and ITV's news, and had a compatible lead-in to boot (an England/Italy preview show).
Originally Posted by Pizzatheaction:
“The soap thing all depends who gets which Round 2 matches. There's no Emmerdale on Monday in case ITV have the teatime match and it goes to extra time.
If BBC One has the Monday 9pm match, EastEnders won't be at 8.30pm. I'd guess they'd join it on to the Tuesday 8pm episode, push Holby to 9pm, and drop Miranda.
Wouldn't surprise me if Bergg plays silly beggars and drops a soap episode into the Friday 8pm slot where You've Been Framed currently resides.”
“The soap thing all depends who gets which Round 2 matches. There's no Emmerdale on Monday in case ITV have the teatime match and it goes to extra time.
If BBC One has the Monday 9pm match, EastEnders won't be at 8.30pm. I'd guess they'd join it on to the Tuesday 8pm episode, push Holby to 9pm, and drop Miranda.
Wouldn't surprise me if Bergg plays silly beggars and drops a soap episode into the Friday 8pm slot where You've Been Framed currently resides.”
And BBC1 get first choice of Round 2 so that Digiguide update isn't complete.
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“Well technically they did. There were two replays. The first one was no goal and The second one was a goal. It confused a few people but Jonathan Pearce wouldn't shut up about the first replay.”
“Well technically they did. There were two replays. The first one was no goal and The second one was a goal. It confused a few people but Jonathan Pearce wouldn't shut up about the first replay.”
They were clearly two separate instances within a few seconds of eachother. Nothing confusing about it, Pearce was the only one confused / causing confusion with his commentary.
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“Pearce and Phil Neville have overtaken Adrian Chiles as World Cup whipping boys on Twitter.”
“Pearce and Phil Neville have overtaken Adrian Chiles as World Cup whipping boys on Twitter.”
It's hilarious because our Social Media Expert didn't see it coming.
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“Well technically they did. There were two replays. The first one was no goal and The second one was a goal. It confused a few people but Jonathan Pearce wouldn't shut up about the first replay.
Pearce and Phil Neville have overtaken Adrian Chiles as World Cup whipping boys on Twitter.”
“Well technically they did. There were two replays. The first one was no goal and The second one was a goal. It confused a few people but Jonathan Pearce wouldn't shut up about the first replay.
Pearce and Phil Neville have overtaken Adrian Chiles as World Cup whipping boys on Twitter.”
Pearce wrongly assumed only the first bounce counted, hence his 'no goal' exclamation, for some reason he couldn't own up when he saw the 2nd bounce. If he had a strong character he would say 'hands up I got confused' - Lawrenson another dinosaur is getting fed up with new technology he would prefer the 1980's and controversy and referee mistakes.
Never liked Pearce and sad that he is the 'best' BBC commentator available - keep him on 5live where he belongs and fans can't witness his bloopers..
Originally Posted by SamuelW:
“Celebrity Survivor is a huge mistake from Itv. Airing it early next year means that it will take important key time-slots which could've held high quality dramas. Also airing it so close to Im a Celebrity will make it seem a bit repetitve. Having this show will also make the IAC format a bit more tired when that returns in Autumn 2015. Overall, this looks like a very high profile ratings-turkey imo.”
“Celebrity Survivor is a huge mistake from Itv. Airing it early next year means that it will take important key time-slots which could've held high quality dramas. Also airing it so close to Im a Celebrity will make it seem a bit repetitve. Having this show will also make the IAC format a bit more tired when that returns in Autumn 2015. Overall, this looks like a very high profile ratings-turkey imo.”
Well at the moment we know very little about it and when its going to air. I suppose its only fair, BBC have 'Tumble Turkey', ITV have 'Celebrity Survivor Turkey'.
ITV aired a trailer of 'The Job Lot' earlier today, so should arrive on ITV2 around a similar time to Plebs. I wouldn't be surprised if they are put together.
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“They were clearly two separate instances within a few seconds of eachother. Nothing confusing about it, Pearce was the only one confused / causing confusion with his commentary.
It's hilarious because our Social Media Expert didn't see it coming.”
“They were clearly two separate instances within a few seconds of eachother. Nothing confusing about it, Pearce was the only one confused / causing confusion with his commentary.
It's hilarious because our Social Media Expert didn't see it coming.”
It's funny how quickly Twitter hatred moved from Adrian Chiles/Andy Townsend/Clarke Carlisle to Jonathan Pearce/Phil Neville. That was not in some people's scripts.
Jonathan Pearce did an interview to defend his performance I think. Unbelievable!
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“It's funny how quickly Twitter hatred moved from Adrian Chiles/Andy Townsend/Clarke Carlisle to Jonathan Pearce/Phil Neville. That was not in some people's scripts.
Jonathan Pearce did an interview to defend his performance I think. Unbelievable!”
“It's funny how quickly Twitter hatred moved from Adrian Chiles/Andy Townsend/Clarke Carlisle to Jonathan Pearce/Phil Neville. That was not in some people's scripts.
Jonathan Pearce did an interview to defend his performance I think. Unbelievable!”
Unbelievable indeed. And he's still going on about it in his commentaries instead of drawing a line under it and moving on.
Not a good WC for the Beeb so far. This is absolutely brilliant:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1JaUD1tWLo
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“Unbelievable indeed. And he's still going on about it in his commentaries instead of drawing a line under it and moving on.”
“Unbelievable indeed. And he's still going on about it in his commentaries instead of drawing a line under it and moving on.”
Do Channel 5 want him back?
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“Unbelievable indeed. And he's still going on about it in his commentaries instead of drawing a line under it and moving on.
Not a good WC for the Beeb so far. This is absolutely brilliant:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1JaUD1tWLo”
“Unbelievable indeed. And he's still going on about it in his commentaries instead of drawing a line under it and moving on.
Not a good WC for the Beeb so far. This is absolutely brilliant:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1JaUD1tWLo”
That is brilliant!
I'm tolerating both presenting teams on BBC and ITV to be honest. BBC aren't as great as some say and ITV aren't as bad as some say.
Originally Posted by Ice dragon1:
“Well didn't think id say this, but Brazil suck at the moment.”
“Well didn't think id say this, but Brazil suck at the moment.”
Mexico look dangerous, don't they? I wouldn't be surprised if they cause an upset here you know.
Good game IMO despite the scoreline. I think ratings wise it can achieve the top end estimates.
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“BBC aren't as great as some say and ITV aren't as bad as some say.”
“BBC aren't as great as some say and ITV aren't as bad as some say.”
That sums it up really.
From the one line trolls on Twitter you'd expect glitter to pour out of BBC's set whereas ITV are presenting from a locked off camera in a bunker.
Originally Posted by burbe:
“Does anyone know what date the schedule is decided for the knockout stages?
Indeed, we'll have to wait for the paper schedules.”
“Does anyone know what date the schedule is decided for the knockout stages?
Indeed, we'll have to wait for the paper schedules.”
Sat 28 & Sun 29 will be confirmed after next Tuesday's games
Mon 30 & Tue 1 will be confirmed after next Thursday's games
Originally Posted by Dancc:
“Mexico look dangerous, don't they? I wouldn't be surprised if they cause an upset here you know.
Good game IMO despite the scoreline. I think ratings wise it can achieve the top end estimates.”
“Mexico look dangerous, don't they? I wouldn't be surprised if they cause an upset here you know.
Good game IMO despite the scoreline. I think ratings wise it can achieve the top end estimates.”
I no that's the thing. If I was Brasil I'd be worried now.
Originally Posted by Andy23:
“That sums it up really.
From the one line trolls on Twitter you'd expect glitter to pour out of BBC's set whereas ITV are presenting from a locked off camera in a bunker.”
“That sums it up really.
From the one line trolls on Twitter you'd expect glitter to pour out of BBC's set whereas ITV are presenting from a locked off camera in a bunker.”
What's the deal with the bullet hole on ITV set? Is it an in-joke or something?
Originally Posted by Andy23:
“That sums it up really.
From the one line trolls on Twitter you'd expect glitter to pour out of BBC's set whereas ITV are presenting from a locked off camera in a bunker.”
“That sums it up really.
From the one line trolls on Twitter you'd expect glitter to pour out of BBC's set whereas ITV are presenting from a locked off camera in a bunker.”
Adrian Chiles slouches and mumbles sometimes but he has always been like that from the Working Lunch days. I like him and I don't care what people say. I like Lineker too but he can't do small talk.
Both have strengths and weaknesses......and neither are as good as Jeff Stelling!
Originally Posted by newkid30:
“What's the deal with the bullet hole on ITV set? Is it an in-joke or something?”
“What's the deal with the bullet hole on ITV set? Is it an in-joke or something?
”
The studios were attacked by protesters, and no not protesting about ITV's football coverage!
Originally Posted by Ice dragon1:
“I no that's the thing. If I was Brasil I'd be worried now.”
“I no that's the thing. If I was Brasil I'd be worried now.”
Rioters from last week struck the glass
Originally Posted by Philip Wilson:
“The studios were attacked by protesters, and no not protesting about ITV's football coverage!”
“The studios were attacked by protesters, and no not protesting about ITV's football coverage!
”
OMG that's crazy
Thanks for info
Originally Posted by Ice dragon1:
“Well didn't think id say this, but Brazil suck at the moment.”
“Well didn't think id say this, but Brazil suck at the moment.”
Good thing it's a sprint and not a marathon.
Originally Posted by cylon6:
“
Pearce and Phil Neville have overtaken Adrian Chiles as World Cup whipping boys on Twitter.”
“
Pearce and Phil Neville have overtaken Adrian Chiles as World Cup whipping boys on Twitter.”
Neville was a pundit last night and got mostly praise. So I don't know where you're getting that from. Secondly no will ever get more whipping than Chiles. Thirdly Andy Townsend and Clarke Carlisle...... Enough said. Keep deluding yourself.
Originally Posted by Andy23:
“That sums it up really.
From the one line trolls on Twitter you'd expect glitter to pour out of BBC's set whereas ITV are presenting from a locked off camera in a bunker.”
“That sums it up really.
From the one line trolls on Twitter you'd expect glitter to pour out of BBC's set whereas ITV are presenting from a locked off camera in a bunker.”
ITV have nobody in the league of Seedorf or Henry.
111 of 351
