• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: UK
The Ratings Thread (Part 60)
<<
<
93 of 351
>>
>
SamuelW
15-06-2014
Originally Posted by Hollie_Louise:
“There isn't a ratings war over the World Cup Samuel. There's very very little either broadcaster can do to improve viewing figures of a football match. And as the BBC are publicly funded, they shouldn't be entering into any kind of ratings war IMO.”

There is a ratings war. Both broadcasters pick matches which they believe will rate as high as possible and make their World Cup ratings average higher than their rival's. Every day the press offices have been tweeting the ratings. Pride is at stake to win the World Cup ratings war.

At present the averages are:

BBC- 8.1m/47pct [excluding Eng: 6.4m/37pct]
Itv- 5.1m/32pct [excluding Japan game]

The BBC are comfortably ahead, and will be even more so when the Japan v Cote D'Ivoire 2am rating is revealed. The BBC's 5pm game involving Columbia v Greece rated 1.2million and 6 share points higher than Itv's 5pm game from Friday involving similar kind of minnow countries such as Mexico and Cameroon. So the bbc's higher weekly reach and ability to draw a casual audience is showing through there and visible statistically. The BBC now has 4 days in a row full of prime time games to keep up their averages.
Salv*
15-06-2014
Originally Posted by Tassium:
“People who don't know football claiming England played poorly...

Actually they played very well, losing the game narrowly.”

As a Italy supporter, I kind of agree they did well. But a lot of people saying that Italy shouldn't have won were watching a different game. They both did well, but Italy edged them out. At most, it's fair to say a draw, but there's no way Italy didn't deserve the win.
wizzywick
15-06-2014
Originally Posted by Tassium:
“People who don't know football claiming England played poorly...

Actually they played very well, losing the game narrowly.”

Actually, the teams are on par with other. Italy and England are both teams out of their "prime". Italy consisted of older, experienced players and England was a more youthful, less internationally experienced team. They played well against a team of their level. You have to put it in context. Put them against Germany or Brazil and see if they play well then.
SamuelW
15-06-2014
Originally Posted by Salv*:
“As a Italy supporter, I kind of agree they did well. But a lot of people saying that Italy shouldn't have won were watching a different game. They both did well, but Italy edged them out. At most, it's fair to say a draw, but there's no way Italy didn't deserve the win.”

Why do you support Italy even though you were born and bred in England? Not a criticism but Im just wondering
Cricketblade
15-06-2014
I don't watch a lot of bbc stuff these days. Noticed they are using the football to advertise other shows like great british bake off. Doubt many of us tuning in just for the football will be part of a crossover audience!!!
SamuelW
15-06-2014
Originally Posted by Cricketblade:
“I don't watch a lot of bbc stuff these days. Noticed they are using the football to advertise other shows like great british bake off. Doubt many of us tuning in just for the football will be part of a crossover audience!!!”

Actually it has been statistically proven that for England games, many more females watch the games compared to other football matches. In a normal football match, the audience is about 2/3 male. But for England games it is about 55pct male and 45pct female. Therefore cross-promoting Great British Bake Off during yesterday's England coverage was a brilliant move. There were in excess of 10million people watching, many of whom were the female kind of viewers who are traditional GBBO viewers. The bbc's cross-promotion ability during the World Cup, Wimbledon and Commonwealth Games will be well exploited.
Fudd
15-06-2014
Originally Posted by Salv*:
“As a Italy supporter, I kind of agree they did well. But a lot of people saying that Italy shouldn't have won were watching a different game. They both did well, but Italy edged them out. At most, it's fair to say a draw, but there's no way Italy didn't deserve the win.”

Really? I don't think Italy deserved the win. IIRC England had more possession and more chances on goal but Italy were helped by awful defending. But I don' think England deserved to win it either. A draw would have been a fair result.

Great figure for the football. Both channels will be happy with how the World Cup is going so far.
bwfcol
15-06-2014
Will the 2am game not be until tomorrow?
Tassium
15-06-2014
Originally Posted by Cricketblade:
“I don't watch a lot of bbc stuff these days. Noticed they are using the football to advertise other shows like great british bake off. Doubt many of us tuning in just for the football will be part of a crossover audience!!!”

The BBC do this with everything nowadays, it's really closer to desperation than a cunning plan.
SamuelW
15-06-2014
Originally Posted by bwfcol:
“Will the 2am game not be until tomorrow?”

The Japan v Ivory Coast coverage average will be covered on two separate ratings day. The 14th June and 15th June ratings because it crossed 2am which is the BARB cut off point for a day. Someone will need to calculate that rating manually i think, hopefully DMN or tvratingsuk can do it.
northlad
15-06-2014
Originally Posted by SamuelW:
“There is a ratings war. Both broadcasters pick matches which they believe will rate as high as possible and make their World Cup ratings average higher than their rival's. Every day the press offices have been tweeting the ratings. Pride is at stake to win the World Cup ratings war.

At present the averages are:

BBC- 8.1m/47pct [excluding Eng: 6.4m/37pct]
Itv- 5.1m/32pct [excluding Japan game]

The BBC are comfortably ahead, and will be even more so when the Japan v Cote D'Ivoire 2am rating is revealed. The BBC's 5pm game involving Columbia v Greece rated 1.2million and 6 share points higher than Itv's 5pm game from Friday involving similar kind of minnow countries such as Mexico and Cameroon. So the bbc's higher weekly reach and ability to draw a casual audience is showing through there and visible statistically. The BBC now has 4 days in a row full of prime time games to keep up their averages.”

Any views on the BBC commentary team Samuel?
SamuelW
15-06-2014
Originally Posted by northlad:
“Any views on the BBC commentary team Samuel?”

I thought Guy Mowbray was solid as ever. The four main commentators for the BBC are all better than Itv's commentators, some of whom have never commentated on a major tournament before. Phil neville wasnt great but it was his first main co-commentory and he will improve. Even in his current state, he's better than Itv's Andy Townsend. In fact many tweets yesterday mentinoning Phil Neville also included Townsend and Chiles, which just shows how badly received Chiles and Townsend are.
Salv*
15-06-2014
Originally Posted by SamuelW:
“Why do you support Italy even though you were born and bred in England? Not a criticism but Im just wondering ”

It was my first language, got an Italian passport, all my family were born there except me, etc...
SamuelW
15-06-2014
Originally Posted by Salv*:
“It was my first language, got an Italian passport, all my family were born there except me, etc...”

Oh ok. So do you support England as well? Say England qualify from the group and Italy dont, would you support England or want them to lose?
cylon6
15-06-2014
Enormous ratings for that time of day
Originally Posted by Philip Wilson:
“Great for the football, could be some enormous ratings for the ones in primetime on that measure!”

I was thinking the same thing. The primetime England matches will be enormous especially as these matches decide if England get past the group stages.
SamuelW
15-06-2014
Originally Posted by Fudd:
“Great figure for the football. Both channels will be happy with how the World Cup is going so far.”

Worth mentioning that Uruguay v Costa Rica was the second worst rating primetime group game for a World Cup match since 2006. Only Denmark v Cameroon [5.1million] rated worse for a prime time group game in the 2010 tournament [also shown on Itv].
ChrisE
15-06-2014
Originally Posted by KennyT:
“You want optimism?

The group results:
Italy draw with Costa Rica
England beat Uruguay

Italy draw with Uruguay
England beat Costa Rica

Final group table:
England 6pts
Italy 5pts
Costa Rica 4pts
Uruguay 1pt.



K”

That's my kind of optimism.
northlad
15-06-2014
Originally Posted by SamuelW:
“I thought Guy Mowbray was solid as ever. The four main commentators for the BBC are all better than Itv's commentators, some of whom have never commentated on a major tournament before. Phil neville wasnt great but it was his first main co-commentory and he will improve. Even in his current state, he's better than Itv's Andy Townsend. In fact many tweets yesterday mentinoning Phil Neville also included Townsend and Chiles, which just shows how badly received Chiles and Townsend are.”

Phil Neville was so badly received he is still trending on twitter,no mention whatsoever of Childs and Townsend.
Salv*
15-06-2014
Originally Posted by SamuelW:
“Oh ok. So do you support England as well? Say England qualify from the group and Italy dont, would you support England or want them to lose?”

Not really, I barely like any of the players. After Italy get knocked out, I will lose interest very quickly. It's difficult to explain but there is a weird relationship between Italians supporting England that has gone on since the first World Cups in the 1930s. It's jus the footie, I have supported GB in Olympics and I do love this country, I just don't support the football team.
northlad
15-06-2014
Originally Posted by SamuelW:
“Oh ok. So do you support England as well? Say England qualify from the group and Italy dont, would you support England or want them to lose?”

So are you not allowed to support another country if you are English?
cylon6
15-06-2014
Originally Posted by lewiep93:
“Goal wise: I'm predicting 2-1 to Italy.

Ratings wise: 9.2m broadcast average, 12.1m match average, 15.6m peak.

Bold predictions I know ”

You weren't far off!
Salv*
15-06-2014
Originally Posted by northlad:
“So are you not allowed to support another country if you are English?”

Apparently not!
SamuelW
15-06-2014
Originally Posted by northlad:
“So are you not allowed to support another country if you are English?”

No, I havent said that. Read my posts again.
cylon6
15-06-2014
The night time England ratings were similar to these.

Originally Posted by lewiep93:
“The group stage matches for World Cup 86 are particularly interesting and relevant to tonight.

Code:
03/06/1986   BBC 1          England v Portugal                11.65m
*Shown from 22:50-00:55
06/06/1986   ITV            England v Morocco                 11.35m
*Shown from 22:30-01:00
11/06/1986   BBC 1          England v Poland                  12.30m
*Shown from 22:25-00:55
So tonight could be like 1986 in that the match averages 11m+. What's even more interesting that even in 1986 England matches got those ratings at that time of night.

Timings are from Daily Express ”

yorkie100
15-06-2014
Originally Posted by northlad:
“Phil Neville was so badly received he is still trending on twitter,no mention whatsoever of Childs and Townsend.”

And you are still going on about it on here !!!
<<
<
93 of 351
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map