|
||||||||
HO: Ste storyline paving the way for Amy's return? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: scotland (:
Posts: 17,356
|
HO: Ste storyline paving the way for Amy's return?
I can't see another way for this storyline to go but Amy would never let Ste keep the kids if she knew what was going on..
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,071
|
I'm surprised that Amy has sent the kids to live with Ste full time in the first place
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,086
|
I really hope so...
Always have time for the lovely Amy!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 6,425
|
I wish it was the case but I doubt it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,514
|
I don't understand why she hasn't been brought back!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 5,931
|
Quote:
I don't understand why she hasn't been brought back!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Denmark with Steven Beale
Posts: 2,068
|
would love if she came back!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,336
|
Amy Barnes is a living Hollyoaks legend. I'd be very surprised if she's not back soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: God didn't do this, devil did
Posts: 28,118
|
I'm in the minority but I didn't like Amy, so I was happy when she left and I don't want to see a return.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6,206
|
Quote:
I'm surprised that Amy has sent the kids to live with Ste full time in the first place
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 6,425
|
Quote:
Maybe because she's a terrible mother. I mean she abandoned Lucus when he was born so I'm not surprised in the slightest she's done this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,622
|
I liked Amy but I'm not sure what her returning would actually do for the show. She's been fairly ineffectual the last couple of times she's appeared, and I don't always think she's got Ste's best interests at heart.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,071
|
Quote:
Maybe because she's a terrible mother. I mean she abandoned Lucus when he was born so I'm not surprised in the slightest she's done this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 6,425
|
Quote:
I liked Amy but I'm not sure what her returning would actually do for the show. She's been fairly ineffectual the last couple of times she's appeared, and I don't always think she's got Ste's best interests at heart.
I'd rather see Amy back then endure any more of these tedious Ste storylines. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 200
|
I actually really enjoyed Amy's friendship with Ste after he got himself sorted.
Honestly, I have always viewed them as two of the best soap parents around (I know Ste is struggling now, but previously you can't deny he hasn't been a good dad to Leah and Lucas). They showed that despite being very young parents they have overcome their problems and have always had their children's best interests first. That and you actually see their children on the show. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Northern Britain
Posts: 231
|
Quote:
I liked Amy but I'm not sure what her returning would actually do for the show. She's been fairly ineffectual the last couple of times she's appeared, and I don't always think she's got Ste's best interests at heart.
No matter how great a character Brendan was, he was a violent, abusive thug, who frequently threatened and intimidated Amy herself. She was absolutely, always in the right to want Ste, the father of her children, to stay away from him. Anything else, it's Stes life, she's not responsible for his wellbeing, and like Ste himself, she's an amazing person just for supporting her former abuser after everything he/Brendan did to her/him. She loves Ste, but he frequently messes up his life. She can't be there every time he falls - she has the kids to think about. ![]() BTW - This isn't directed at you personally, but to everyone who watches Ste/Amy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,783
|
I must have missed the bit that explained why Ste has them now anyway? I would like to see her back, she was ace and I loved her and Ste as a team, spesh now he's on the outs with Sinead!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,099
|
I hope so! I am still mad that Emma Smithwick justified a longterm character like Amy to further benefit the relationship between Ste and Brendan! Ridiculous I hope she does come back she deserves to be welcomed back
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Norfolkland
Posts: 1,787
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lexstar;72972562[B
]I must have missed the bit that explained why Ste has them now anyway?[/b] I would like to see her back, she was ace and I loved her and Ste as a team, spesh now he's on the outs with Sinead!
I think _elly001 is right though - whilst I personally wouldn't mind seeing Amy back, I'm not sure either what her returning would actually do for the show. There's too many storylines being practically ignored as it is, without adding more into the mix. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,745
|
The problem with bringing Amy back is that Ste would have someone around who loves and cares for him. Hollyoaks want Ste down in the gutter and that can't happen with Amy around.
What I find silly though is Ste has his whole family in the village, yet they're not remotely bothered about his well-being. I suppose it's been established that Danny isn't really interested in Ste, but I would have thought Sam, Tegan and Leela would have been more concerned, but that wouldn't suit Hollyoaks' agenda either. They want Ste at rock bottom so they are alienating him from everyone who can help and support him. And that includes Amy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 145
|
I always found her a bit boring. But yeah in reality surely set would let Amy take the kids back rather than social services get involved
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 200
|
Quote:
What I find silly though is Ste has his whole family in the village, yet they're not remotely bothered about his well-being. I suppose it's been established that Danny isn't really interested in Ste, but I would have thought Sam, Tegan and Leela would have been more concerned, but that wouldn't suit Hollyoaks' agenda either. They want Ste at rock bottom so they are alienating him from everyone who can help and support him. And that includes Amy.
Instead the writers have shoehorned Leela/Ziggy, are going to have a pointless day-long storyline with Tegan next week and not even mention the rest of his family for goodness knows how long. Why, rather than involving them in his storylines I do not know. I would much rather watch a moving drugs storyline where Ste gets the help from his family/friends than use it as a stupid plot device to further involve him in the crap gangster stuff. Long run is that it is true that Amy would have already noticed this and at least tried to help Ste through his problems. Even Tony and JP have given up on him too easily (in my opinion), and not even suggested to him that he needs professional help. Honestly I'm surprised Ste hadn't had a breakdown earlier. Just on the top of my head he; was abused physically and emotionally as a child by his step-dad and mum, abused in a relationship, is a widower, been in a coma, had a close friend (Rae) murdered, nearly slept with his dad, had to cover said dad's affair, almost arrested for a murder he didn't commit and helped his mum in an assisted suicide! |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 200
|
Quote:
I always found her a bit boring. But yeah in reality surely set would let Amy take the kids back rather than social services get involved
Spoiler
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Norfolkland
Posts: 1,787
|
Quote:
The problem with bringing Amy back is that Ste would have someone around who loves and cares for him. Hollyoaks want Ste down in the gutter and that can't happen with Amy around.
What I find silly though is Ste has his whole family in the village, yet they're not remotely bothered about his well-being. I suppose it's been established that Danny isn't really interested in Ste, but I would have thought Sam, Tegan and Leela would have been more concerned, but that wouldn't suit Hollyoaks' agenda either. They want Ste at rock bottom so they are alienating him from everyone who can help and support him. And that includes Amy. I have to say, while I could accept Sam and Leela being distracted by the Danny business, you're bang on about Tegan - though since she's apparently dropped off the face of the earth mere weeks after the father of her child was murdered (and she's the one who found his body) I guess we're supposed to believe that she's not fussed either, reinforced by her being involved in a one day bit of fluff next week. The BIB isn't unusual though... at least for Hollyoaks (yes, I said it). Tom and Cindy anyone? They barely clap eyes on each other, yet they've lived in the same village for years. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:00.





I would much rather watch a moving drugs storyline where Ste gets the help from his family/friends than use it as a stupid plot device to further involve him in the crap gangster stuff.