|
||||||||
Your World Cup Dark Horse? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#51 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 767
|
Quote:
Remember in 1998 even when France had an excellent squad, they were absolutely useless the one game they had to play without Zidane? They may have been a team full of great players, but he was the glue that held it all together and made it work. He could single-handedly take a game by the "scruff of the neck" and change its course. Everyone started playing well when Zidane was around. I am convinced that France would have won in 2006 if he hadn't been sent off. He made all the difference on the pitch.
I would put Zidane in the same category as Maradona, Pele, Cruyff. 2002 - he was injured and missed the first two games and the third game he played but was clearly struggling. 2006 - France were poor until Zidane took over against Spain the 2nd round, was majestic against Brazil in the quarters, scored in the semi final and final and went out in style by headbutting the 'evil' Materazzi. Zidane was the man for France - without him they have looked average. On a side note the 2000 team that won the Euro's were an absolute force. Zidane, Vieira and Henry at their peak along with the 98 defence and being able to call on guys like Trezeguet off the bench - they would rival any team from years gone by. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 8,451
|
Quote:
Belgium by a mile have a look at their squad.
Wales used to have up to 3 or 4 star players at a time, but as an international side haven't done anything of note. Although Belgium are a better team it could be a similar comparison. Can only see Chile or Ecuador upsetting the big teams. Don't know how well the African teams are playing ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,578
|
Quote:
On a side note the 2000 team that won the Euro's were an absolute force. Zidane, Vieira and Henry at their peak along with the 98 defence and being able to call on guys like Trezeguet off the bench - they would rival any team from years gone by.
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 767
|
Quote:
That was probably the best team I have ever seen play in my lifetime. They looked absolutely unstoppable. I wanted Italy to win badly, but France were in a different league.
But yeah, that French team was quite something. |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,578
|
Quote:
Actually Italy at Euro 2000 did quite well against the French in the final. They were the better team for the 90 mins - even the pundits agreed. The problem was Del Piero missing those two one on one's and Toldo letting in a soft goal, after having such a wonderful tournament.
But yeah, that French team was quite something. |
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 767
|
Quote:
Italy were top class and created an almost impenetrable wall in the back as they usually do, but France in Euro 2000 looked like a tank and I felt that it was only a matter of time before they broke Italy down. It was a great final though - just like the France v Italy 2006 WC final was fantastic. Those two sides are great together.
Not a fan of the 2006 final myself - wanted Italy to win but thought it was an average game. |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 2,840
|
The problem Belgium have is a tough run in. If they win their group they'll probably have Portugal followed by Argentina. Belgium have some good players but I wouldn't call them world class, they may have a chance in Euro 2016 but not in this World Cup.
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 5,258
|
Zidane is the best footballer I've seen since I started watching football regularly (early 90s when Maradona was on the way down). Well, certainly the best of his kind anyway. He achieved great things, always stood out individually even amongst great players like at Real and France, and he did it all with a certain style and grace too.
Are France high enough odds to be considered a dark horse this time around? I do think they'll have a good tournament to make up for the bad display last time around. Edit:- http://www.oddschecker.com/football/world-cup/winner France are 6th favourites at an average of around 22/1. The betting market basically has 4 favoured teams (Brazil, Argentina, Spain and Germany from 3/1 to 13/2) and then everyone else from 20/1 upwards, so I suppose any team outside the top 4 could be considered a dark horse really. |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,578
|
Quote:
Zidane is the best footballer I've seen since I started watching football regularly (early 90s when Maradona was on the way down). Well, certainly the best of his kind anyway. He achieved great things, always stood out individually even amongst great players like at Real and France, and he did it all with a certain style and grace too.
|
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 4,983
|
Quote:
Zidane is the best footballer I've seen since I started watching football regularly (early 90s when Maradona was on the way down). Well, certainly the best of his kind anyway. He achieved great things, always stood out individually even amongst great players like at Real and France, and he did it all with a certain style and grace too.
Are France high enough odds to be considered a dark horse this time around? I do think they'll have a good tournament to make up for the bad display last time around. Edit:- http://www.oddschecker.com/football/world-cup/winner France are 6th favourites at an average of around 22/1. The betting market basically has 4 favoured teams (Brazil, Argentina, Spain and Germany from 3/1 to 13/2) and then everyone else from 20/1 upwards, so I suppose any team outside the top 4 could be considered a dark horse really. If we're talking about lower-ranked teams which might make the semi-finals a la Sweden and Bulgaria in 94, Croatia in 98, Turkey and South Korea in 02 and Uruguay last time, then I think Bosnia and Herzegovina could be this year's. Good chance of qualifying from their group, tied with one of the weaker group in the second round, and some good players, playing in their first World Cup as a nation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#61 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 767
|
Chile have been given the kiss of death - Pele's only gone and said they'll be the dark horse this year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 7,349
|
Quote:
Chile have been given the kiss of death - Pele's only gone and said they'll be the dark horse this year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,796
|
Chile are looking good, but I feel to be the dark horses, not only will they have to through a difficult group, they'll have to win it to avoid Brazil in round 2
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Richmond, Surrey.
Posts: 13,814
|
Dark horses ? Well, I have money on Uruguay. I also think Colombia or Chile might spring a few surprises. They are all available at good odds.
Looking at France, they have quite a cushy draw that should take them into the last eight and they could grow in confidence. Not sure I'd call France real "dark horses" though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 343
|
The thing with France is they seem to require some sort of talisman to do pretty much anything of note.
Look at Platini and look immediately after he retired - 1988 - didn't qualify, 1990 - didn't qualify, 1992 - poor, 1994 - didn't qualify. Pretty shocking return rate pre-Zidane. And now, after Zidane, who knows? |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,993
|
wasn't that impressed with my tip the Ivory Coast last night. can't see them going beyond the second round at best now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 5,258
|
Quote:
The thing with France is they seem to require some sort of talisman to do pretty much anything of note.
Look at Platini and look immediately after he retired - 1988 - didn't qualify, 1990 - didn't qualify, 1992 - poor, 1994 - didn't qualify. Pretty shocking return rate pre-Zidane. And now, after Zidane, who knows? |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kingdom of Arnor
Posts: 78,227
|
Despite the defeat last night, I'm sticking with Bosnia reaching the last eight - just as long as they sort themselves out in the final third and stop being so wasteful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 26,167
|
Quote:
I suppose Benzema is their star now. Pogba could become the next one they look to if he continues as he's going.
I fancy Bosnia to give France a real game in the last 16 though and could nick it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kingdom of Arnor
Posts: 78,227
|
Chile looking a decent bet now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Belfast
Posts: 5,237
|
I fancied Chile from the start although I thought they'd get through the group at the expense of Holland not Spain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 15,746
|
I think the USA could surprise everyone and reach the quater finals, where they would likely face Argentina.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 6,436
|
Quote:
I think the USA could surprise everyone and reach the quater finals, where they would likely face Argentina.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 65,752
|
I think Chile do look good.
If they do face Brazil in the next round I actually think they could beat them as Brazil haven't impressed me. I'll be interested in watching how they do in their final group match against Holland. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:06.




