Originally Posted by mgvsmith:
“Isolationists are those who don't want Rock music in the mainstream, they think it's better staying outside of the mainstream, as an 'Underground' scene if that has any meaning, I don't go with that.
I think your point though about the 'taste makers' is interesting. Radio 1 despite broadcast fragmentation still has an influence on what gets heard in the mainstream.”
I know it isn't your tem and i wouldn't imply it was, but that is one phrase I simply detest. It is such a pretentious, arrogant, phrase, which to me suggests we "ordinary" people are incapable of knowing what to like or dislike so these "taste makers" can tell us. A simply awful phrase.
Originally Posted by mgvsmith:
“If rock music is as popular as you suggest you would expect at least a few of the R1 producers to be fans of some sort?”
The 'proof' is there. Avenged Sevenfold, Black Sabbath, You Me at Six, Black Stone Cherry, Within Temptation, Alter Bridge, etc, have all had Top 10 albums in the last year or so, Download has @ 80,000+, Sonisphere @ 60,000+, Bloodstock always sells out.
If Rock wasn't popular this wouldn't be the case.
Originally Posted by mgvsmith:
“IAlso the reference to the Mercury is telling as it suggests that not only do mainstream broadcasters ignore rock but so do critical circles. You could say much the same for Country and Western music, of course. The question for me would be, Is there any rock music that is at the cultural cutting edge? Big festivals and even big album sales don't tell you anything about that.”
If you take the Mercury Prize as an example, how many of those winners are truly "cutting edge"? Not many, they tend to fall in the BBC/Glastonbury catagory of formulaic, generic, "Indie" music.
There will be over 80,000 people at download this weekend, but if you listen or watch any BBC news between Friday and Sunday you would never know.
Name me any other event in this country that attracts over 80,000 people that wouldn't be reported at all. I bet there aren't many, if any.