Originally Posted by corf:
“The samsung devices people rave about are horrific tbh, also their corporate behaviour record is pretty bad, one of the worst.
I dont mind people slagging off Apple after all it in the in thing. But to ignore Smasung who are in all likelyhood worse than Apple is hypocritical.”
Im not a big Samsung 'fan' either. I dont think anyone should be a brand 'fan'. Some stuff Samsung have made is good, other stuff isnt. Some stuff LG make is good, other stuff isnt (etc etc). To say that things are 'OK' because 'someone else does it too' isnt really a defence.
Apple tend to get singled out because:
1) They have more money sat in the bank than ANY other company - more than many countries.
2) They seem to choose not to do much 'good' with that. Never been big on charity or looking after their employees if the stories are true.
3) Seem keen to stifle competition through the courts
.... and dont forget that if you spend £600 on an iPhone then Apple will take a big chunk as profit (at one point allegedly almost 50%) whereas on a £600 S5 Samsung will take a much lower percentage as profit. Apple like to keep their profit margins considerably higher than the competition.
You could almost argue, if that way inclined, that your £600 iPhone gets £400 worth of hardware and R&D and support and marketing whereas your S5 gives you about £500 worth of hardware and R&D and support and marketing.
(figures are indicative only)