• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Soaps
Hollyoaks - Is Patrick the Father of Sienna's Daughter?
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
RondeEE
05-06-2014
Hi everyone so there have been rumours that Patrick could be the father of Sienna's child but new photos released of her daughter show she has blue eyes. This could be totally irrelevant but given that Patrick and Sienna both have hazel eyes could this mean he is not the father?

what does everyone else think ?
Anna_W
05-06-2014
I hope he's not. He's evil as he is, no need to make him pedophile and incester.
RondeEE
05-06-2014
Originally Posted by Anna_W:
“I hope he's not. He's evil as he is, no need to make him pedophile and incester.”

me too. there are too many similar storylines if he were to be revealed as the father
Selena
05-06-2014
I hope he isn't.
ME1234567
05-06-2014
I did get the impression they were going to go down that road(Patrick being the father of Sienna's daughter) but seems like they have dropped it.
ME1234567
05-06-2014
Originally Posted by Anna_W:
“I hope he's not. He's evil as he is, no need to make him pedophile and incester.”

I agree.
kjg1995
05-06-2014
Can't see it, Patrick and Sienna have already had a conversation about the father.

We all know Hollyoaks, it'll probably be the same guy as Peri's father!
Tom_James2
05-06-2014
I thought this would be the case at first but now I doubt it, but it is hollyoaks so you never know.....
lulu g
05-06-2014
No. Didn't they say the father, like Sienna, was too young at the time to bring up a child?
spikewoman
05-06-2014
Originally Posted by lulu g:
“No. Didn't they say the father, like Sienna, was too young at the time to bring up a child?”

Yeah I think something has been said that scotches the theory that Patrick is the father.

On the note of eye colour it is actually possible for 2 brown eyed people to have a blue eyed child although relatively unusual. It is also possible for 2 blue eyeds to have a brown eyed.
los.kav
06-06-2014
Originally Posted by spikewoman:
“Yeah I think something has been said that scotches the theory that Patrick is the father.

On the note of eye colour it is actually possible for 2 brown eyed people to have a blue eyed child although relatively unusual. It is also possible for 2 blue eyeds to have a brown eyed.”

Patrick and Sienna definitely had a conversation about the father - and it was implied that he was also 13-14 and too young to raise a baby. However, the confusion comes from after that, the conversations with Will, where he found the box and called Patrick sick, implying that he'd done something worse than murder, and then after that in Anna's house where Will then tried to make Patrick confess to what he did, and what he said was very ambiguous, about how after Anna and Dodger disappeared they were lonely, and it was just the two of them, etc. It was strongly hinted that something happened, but what it was, we don't know. Personally, I think they dropped it because of all the accusations of historic sexual abuse against other soap stars.
RondeEE
06-06-2014
Originally Posted by los.kav:
“Patrick and Sienna definitely had a conversation about the father - and it was implied that he was also 13-14 and too young to raise a baby. However, the confusion comes from after that, the conversations with Will, where he found the box and called Patrick sick, implying that he'd done something worse than murder, and then after that in Anna's house where Will then tried to make Patrick confess to what he did, and what he said was very ambiguous, about how after Anna and Dodger disappeared they were lonely, and it was just the two of them, etc. It was strongly hinted that something happened, but what it was, we don't know. Personally, I think they dropped it because of all the accusations of historic sexual abuse against other soap stars.”

very interesting. do you have any idea when they had that conversation as i'd really like to watch it ?
lulu g
06-06-2014
Originally Posted by los.kav:
“Patrick and Sienna definitely had a conversation about the father - and it was implied that he was also 13-14 and too young to raise a baby. However, the confusion comes from after that, the conversations with Will, where he found the box and called Patrick sick, implying that he'd done something worse than murder, and then after that in Anna's house where Will then tried to make Patrick confess to what he did, and what he said was very ambiguous, about how after Anna and Dodger disappeared they were lonely, and it was just the two of them, etc. It was strongly hinted that something happened, but what it was, we don't know. Personally, I think they dropped it because of all the accusations of historic sexual abuse against other soap stars.”

What he did was he kept Sienna locked up in the basement for months, made her give birth there on her own, took her baby away, told her the baby had died, and had her adopted. All that's bad enough and would definitely qualify as sick, surely?
los.kav
06-06-2014
Originally Posted by RondeEE:
“very interesting. do you have any idea when they had that conversation as i'd really like to watch it ?”

No. No idea. The block story telling is atrocious, and each event happened so far apart that it's very hard to keep track of continuity sometimes.

Originally Posted by lulu g:
“What he did was he kept Sienna locked up in the basement for months, made her give birth there on her own, took her baby away, told her the baby had died, and had her adopted. All that's bad enough and would definitely qualify as sick, surely?”

Yes, absolutely, but other than the letters and photographs forward and back between the adoptive parents and Patrick, what evidence of that Sienna's being caged would realistically be in the box? We saw the room Sienna was kept in, and it was like a shrine; nothing had changed from the time she was kept there. It didn't look like anything had been moved (like it was her last link to Sophie and everything had to be kept perfectly). But like I said, that was just my opinion, and I do agree that keeping her locked up and treating her so badly qualifies as sick!
RondeEE
06-06-2014
Originally Posted by lulu g:
“What he did was he kept Sienna locked up in the basement for months, made her give birth there on her own, took her baby away, told her the baby had died, and had her adopted. All that's bad enough and would definitely qualify as sick, surely?”

yeah it definitely is. it's just the fact that Patrick is now so determined to stop Sienna from meeting her daughter that's weird.
09beyoncefan
06-06-2014
Yeah I wouldn't be at all surprised if Cameron was Sophie's father as well as Peri's... I think Sienna was just irresponsible and slept with him when she was 13, got pregnant and that obviously really didn't sit well with Patrick's controlling nature, perhaps that kicked him off big time and made him even more controlling over Sienna?
RondeEE
06-06-2014
Originally Posted by 09beyoncefan:
“Yeah I wouldn't be at all surprised if Cameron was Sophie's father as well as Peri's... I think Sienna was just irresponsible and slept with him when she was 13, got pregnant and that obviously really didn't sit well with Patrick's controlling nature, perhaps that kicked him off big time and made him even more controlling over Sienna?”

that would mean that Cameron must have been with Sienna and Leela around the same time then given that Peri and Nico are the same age and have the same birthday. Is Leela the same age as Sienna ?
lulu g
06-06-2014
Originally Posted by los.kav:
“No. No idea. The block story telling is atrocious, and each event happened so far apart that it's very hard to keep track of continuity sometimes.



Yes, absolutely, but other than the letters and photographs forward and back between the adoptive parents and Patrick, what evidence of that Sienna's being caged would realistically be in the box? We saw the room Sienna was kept in, and it was like a shrine; nothing had changed from the time she was kept there. It didn't look like anything had been moved (like it was her last link to Sophie and everything had to be kept perfectly). But like I said, that was just my opinion, and I do agree that keeping her locked up and treating her so badly qualifies as sick!”

True, there would be no evidence in the box of Sienna having been imprisoned, but the story that the letters and photographs told would be enough for Will to describe as sick, I would think.
dee123
06-06-2014
Well sadly he is that controlling.
Amazee-Dayzee
06-06-2014
I will be laughing my ass off if it turns out that Nico and Peri are half-sisters. Cameron will have Patrick and the Lomaxes all gunning for him at the same time!
Ross1998
06-06-2014
That would be a step too far.
blue_cheese
06-06-2014
according to unrealityTV

Spoiler
Sienna will have lots of questions for Patrick when the truth comes out, but so does Nico.

So do they know each other
lady_xanax
10-07-2014
Originally Posted by Amazee-Dayzee:
“I will be laughing my ass off if it turns out that Nico and Peri are half-sisters. Cameron will have Patrick and the Lomaxes all gunning for him at the same time!”

I can actually believe this. They're unlikely to introduce a new character to be the father.

The storyline definitely seemed to be going down the incest route in the past but now appears to have been dropped.
cmazza
10-07-2014
Originally Posted by RondeEE:
“that would mean that Cameron must have been with Sienna and Leela around the same time then given that Peri and Nico are the same age and have the same birthday. Is Leela the same age as Sienna ?”

Who is Cameron??
Skyfall
11-07-2014
I hope they don't make Patrick the father to Siennas daughter Nico it would make him allot more worse then he is now.
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map