Big Brothers lowest ever launch!!!! 1.6mil viewers

Comments

• Options

  DUNDEEBOY Posts: 110,173

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭✭

  06/06/14 - 08:29 #2

  I said yesterday it would struggle as there was a lot of competition on other channels

  0
• Options

  Leeah Posts: 20,239

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  06/06/14 - 08:40 #3

  It was crap not surprised

  0
• Options

  occulta7 Posts: 1,468

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  06/06/14 - 08:46 #4

  They keep rehashing the same old rubbish with new faces people are bound to get fed up bb is just a pace filler now nothing more!

  0
• Options

  muggins14 Posts: 61,844

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  06/06/14 - 08:49 #5

  Doesn't help that it was on a Thursday night, a work/school night.

  0
• Options

  Gusto Brunt Posts: 12,351

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  06/06/14 - 08:58 #6

  Leeah wrote: »

  It was crap not surprised

  
  i wood agree.

  0
• Options

  SillyBillyGoat Posts: 22,266

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  06/06/14 - 09:00 #7

  Leeah wrote: »

  It was crap not surprised

  
  I enjoyed it very much, definitely much more than last year's launch night.

  0
• Options

  fansforhilson Posts: 297

  Forum Member

  ✭

  06/06/14 - 09:15 #8

  Ratings aren't released till 9:35??

  0
• Options

  Strange Posts: 14,958

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  06/06/14 - 09:20 #9

  What proof?

  0
• Options

  Pitman Posts: 28,495

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  06/06/14 - 09:25 #10

  1.6m intellegent and discerning cool dudes? :cool:

  0
• Options

  jeanoj Posts: 21,852

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  06/06/14 - 09:26 #11

  SillyBillyGoat wrote: »

  I enjoyed it very much, definitely much more than last year's launch night.

  
  So did I - well not more than last years but at least the same.

  0
• Options

  SnowStorm86 Posts: 17,273

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  06/06/14 - 09:28 #12

  I was just happy to have it back. It was an enjoyable launch night and I look forward to tonight's conclusion.

  0
• Options

  Stefano92 Posts: 66,401

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  06/06/14 - 09:34 #13

  Never released that early.

  0
• Options

  MysteriousOz Posts: 6,234

  Forum Member

  ✭

  06/06/14 - 09:37 #14

  Who cares about the ratings, its staying for the time being so sit back and enjoy the next 3 months

  0
• Options

  Sweet_Princess Posts: 11,038

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  06/06/14 - 12:42 #15

  Ratings were better on Channel 4

  0
• Options

  The Informant Posts: 1,043

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  06/06/14 - 12:54 #16

  Such accurate information, only missed out 800k viewers

  0
• Options

  Cal_Scream2 Posts: 6,733

  Forum Member

  ✭

  06/06/14 - 12:57 #17

  Sweet_Princess wrote: »

  Ratings were better on Channel 4

  
  You don't say...

  0
• Options

  dtorre Posts: 3,736

  Forum Member

  ✭✭✭

  06/06/14 - 13:04 #18

  The attention seeking gossip on Twitter was WRONG? No! It can't be! I'm SHOCKED, this must be a first, they are usually such a reliable and reputable source of factual information, who could have foreseen this earth-shaking revelation??

  0
• Options

  FusionFury Posts: 14,121

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  06/06/14 - 19:07 #19

  It's only going to plummet.

  0
• Options

  Sweet_Princess Posts: 11,038

  Forum Member

  ✭✭

  06/06/14 - 19:08 #20

  It was 2.1 million actually

  0
• Options

  Tall Paul Posts: 8,786

  Forum Member

  ✭

  06/06/14 - 19:57 #21

  Sweet_Princess wrote: »

  It was 2.1 million actually

  
  Exactly 1.6 million was unsubstantiated claims. >:(

  0