Originally Posted by RichmondBlue:
“That's not the view of the majority of health professionals who have commentated on this case though. The referee did signal for the trainer, and in those circumstances their duty was first and foremost to check on the well being of the player.
We all know that sometimes a player will "take a rest", but perhaps Hazard should have made it more clear to the referee that he was in no need of treatment.
In any case that doesn't excuse Mourinho's handling of the situation. Behaving like a petulant child on the touchline, then continuing to escalate things further in the interview afterwards. The former is forgivable in the heat of the moment, but he'd had time to cool down, so spouting off to the media was just the height of stupidity.
Then there's Eva's "punishment" by Chelsea. Surely that's out of all proportion ? All she did was thank the public for their messages of support, she didn't mention anything else about the incident. To me that just seems like good manners, people have taken the trouble to drop her a quick line of support and she thanks them..what's the big deal ?
Now she's banned from the bench and training sessions, and not even allowed to enter the team hotel. Who the hell are our PR representitves, didn't they foresee the fall-out over this ?
The media storm is growing, not just in the tabloids but in the broadsheets as well. Obviously some of it is now being twisted out of all proportion, but for that Chelsea have only got themselves to blame.”
With this you will always find "professionals" will fall on the side of caution. That's just the blame culture. They would say it no matter what happened.
From where I was it looked like he was playing for time, Talking to people who watched the game on the TV and people who was at the ground many people thought the same. Hazzard's body language etc all said the same IMO
Social Media as we have seen is a complicated issue in the game. For me its like anything else when anything happens its best if you say nothing. The second you post anything at times like this and it is giving a interview to the media. Any company would be unhappy with a comment along those lines when a story like this is out there. You will often find today when a company is in the press for a negative story a e-mail will go around to all staff reminding them about Social Media.
Jose's media comments was not out of the normal for him. We have seen it time and time before, Yes at times he goes to far but its not like its the first time and wont be the last. You give the job to Jose and these things are going to happen. Why do people take any notice of the rubbish any manager says after games? I would rather hear from the guy drunk who has watched the game from the bar, Would prob be based more in reality then anything any manager rattles on about. SAF use to ban people Jose make's silly comments to the media,Wenger complains about the other team not" playing football" etc. Its path of the course when you give him the contact. It's why I don't see the point in managers giving interviews after the game. We rarely get anything constructive from any of them win lose or draw. Most of the time you just get a load of nonsense no matter what the result. They are just used to drag out the TV time.
I just don't see what the fuss is about, Is this what football is about nowadays? We have a massive doping issue in sports at the moment and yet some of the media seem more worried this rubbish.
It's not like she has been sacked or anything, She still has a very important job at Chelsea, Could you not say she is wasting her time with "match day issues"? She is a highly qualified doctor and if you look at her history I not sure dealing with the sort of thing that you deal with on the pitch during a match is really the best way to use her talents.
I think the "language" of being banned from the team hotel etc might just be "press-talk", If she not involved with the match day team then she of course wont be required at the team hotel etc. Am sure we have many members of staff who are involved with the first team on a daily bases but would not be allowed to wonder into the team hotel, We would not say they was "banned".
If the media really cannot find anything more important then this to report on then someone really should sit down at their next work appraisal and ask are they really in the field and would they not be more at home reporting on "reality tv". With regards to Chelsea alone I can think of a few more important and interesting that would be a better spending of their time. Its just pandering to the lowest denominator.