Originally Posted by RichmondBlue:
“What you say is true, I wouldn't argue with that. But I do wonder if we need to jump on this home-grown bandwagon. I realise we have to get the content of the squad right to satisfy the rules, but providing we have some youngsters coming through that meet the criteria do we need to pay vastly inflated prices for players just because they happen to be English.
After all, codeblue is also right. Our £26m offer for Stones wasn't derisory, it was already considerably more than his real "worth" in European football. It's only our bizarrely inflated "homegrown" market in the Uk that rates players like Luke Shaw at £30m and Raheem Sterling at £50m.
It only appears to be a few English clubs who are prepared to pay this premium. Lots of top quality players are changing hands at far more reasonable sums around Europe. Bayern Munich for example, they manage to get hold of real quality without having to go into the stratosphere in terms of transfer fees. We've done the same ourselves of course with Pedro and others before him. Paying close to £40m for a "potentially" very good player like Stones just seems daft to me.”
Buying players from the premership is going to be a very expensive business going forward due to the new TV deal, Even the clubs coming up unless they go utterly crazy will have money to spend so wont need to sell the crown jewels.
We need a defender, Cahill is good very good but is he good enough? Working along side JT yes prob more often then not he will be good enough but we have to look past last seasons fantastic performances from JT and think of the next few seasons, Even if JT has season has a season half as good as last (which would still be great) if he picks up a minor injury at his age and due to his style of play he could be out for weeks, While we could shop around europe for someone and find a cheaper version, How long would they take to settle into football over here? A week is too long, We need someone who has played in the premeirship.
Our game is built on defense, As we have seen in the few games this season if our defense is not on it 100% we are on very shakey ground. Yes its not ideal to pay such a massive fee and its a massive risk IMO its a even bigger risk not doing something.
We have backed ourselfs into a corner, Could we win the title if our current defense was on it? Yes 100% of course we could, Could we win it if our defense was at 70% not a bloody chance.
I am not one for "buying English" for the sake of it (think most of the players lack the ability personailty or intellegence to be top top players) but watching Stones I think he does have the personailly and intellegence to do so. Watching him when he dosnt have the ball telling players where to go and "getting" in players way to stop them getting the ball etc is something we need both as a starter and as bench player. Also I think since he knows he is stepping up a level professional he would not have a problem being on the bench. Yes he is a expensive player to be on the bench but when your behind JT then I think you need to be, You dont replace one of the best defenders around with just anyone
Its a risk a massive one I admit and yes he is overpriced massively but I dont see that many other options out there that if Cahill get sent off against Palace (or was not fit) that would not make me cross myself more times then Bruno did against Tyson for the next game.
Stone's is the type of player if I saw him starting I would not worry about if he is going to perform or not. Yes would perfer JT and Cahill at their majestic best but if we cannot have that? I think someone like Stone's is a very good option. His intellegence for such a young player is very very impressive