Originally Posted by The_don1:
“To "dominate" you need to at least retain the trophy or title etc once and no team has done that.
If you look the Champions League during the times when we could have "dominated" it I think only Munich have got to consecutive finals and even before that in modern football teams might have got to the finals twice consecutively but I don't think many more then that.
This idea of dominating the Champions League is no more then a fairy tale used by the media to sell the English League. In actual reality its almost impossible to do that”
“To "dominate" you need to at least retain the trophy or title etc once and no team has done that.
If you look the Champions League during the times when we could have "dominated" it I think only Munich have got to consecutive finals and even before that in modern football teams might have got to the finals twice consecutively but I don't think many more then that.
This idea of dominating the Champions League is no more then a fairy tale used by the media to sell the English League. In actual reality its almost impossible to do that”
No, because whatever they like to call the Champions League it's still basically a knockout cup completion. I think we should have established ourselves as diners at the top table though.
From 2003 up to 2009, it did look as if we had achieved that. In six seasons we had been in four semi-finals and finished as runners up once in the CL. In the same six seasons, we had also won two PL titles and finished as runners-up three times.
As you say "domination" of the CL is virtually impossible, but we had the nucleus of a great team in that period and failed to build on it. It's ironic really that our only CL win came after a very poor PL season, with an ageing team including several of the players from that period.



