Originally Posted by codeblue:
“An interesting addition to the weekend da farce:
"Reports on Monday night claimed that Premier League delegate Steve Greaves, who was at Saturday’s 1-1 draw at Stamford Bridge to assess Atkinson, agreed with the referee on the four contentious decisions which most angered Mourinho."
So not only did the ref see but not give the four decisions, the fa official at the game assessing the ref also agreed with the ref!
The closed shop, closing ranks makes them look ridiculous. They are ridiculous. They are not fit for purpose, I honestly think, after reading the above, that Jose is correct, surely they cannot be this incompetent and seemingly bias without an agenda?”
Did you see the bit he put at the end about the Barnes incident with Matic ?
"it looked worse than it actually was because Matic had his leg planted".
Isn't that the bloody point, with his leg planted the chances of an horrific injury were multiplied ten-fold. How does that mitigate a dangerous challenge that could have finished a player's career ?
Then there was the hand-ball. Saying the ball was hit with force from a short distance. Agreed, it was, but the player was standing with both arms outstretched. That's completely unnatural unless you're attempting to jump for the ball, which he wasn't.
I've never ascribed to the "bias" argument before, but now I'm beginning to wonder. The only other explanation is total incompetence and lack of knowledge of the game, which seems unlikely.
With the Qatar news today, I've never been so sick about the state of the game I've always loved. To be honest, I'm seriously thinking of calling it a day. But I think I'll see the season out and see what develops.