DS Forums

 
 

France vs Honduras - BBC One 8pm KO


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15-06-2014, 21:14
celesti
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 15,844
The whole ball has to go over and one of the replay's showed that wasn't the case.
Camera angles have always been deceptive, that's why they went with goalline technology as opposed to a fourth official watching replays.
celesti is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 15-06-2014, 21:15
Sattrega
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kingdom of Arnor
Posts: 78,227
The whole ball has to go over and one of the replay's showed that wasn't the case.
But the first replay is irrelevant, everyone with eyes could see that was no goal.
Sattrega is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:15
jenzie
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: BUDDIETOWN
Posts: 20,385
to me, BY THE TELEVISION PICTURES, it didn't fully cross the line!
by the tech it DID!

it's millimetres though

and good that they show ALL the moments of doubt .....
jenzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:15
swaydog
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,105
Computer says no... er sorry I mean yes.

-------------------
This was always going to happen. The idea that technology can ever remove controversy in football was naive.

It's just another thing to argue about.
There was no controversy . They showed both so we could see if it was a goal by Benzema or an own goal.
Seemed pretty clear to me.
swaydog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:15
Pink Knight
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 8,451
Jonathan Pearce is so busy getting excited that he is unable to think, sometimes.
That was actually a great test of Goal Line Technology, that it passed.
It made sense eventually, it was Pearce going into Robot Wars mode that made it seem chaotic.
Pink Knight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:15
FrankieFixer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 11,355
Pat Nevin on 5 live - "I don't think it has gone over the line. I am disagreeing with the technology. That is not a goal."

Is he drunk?
Terrible pundit.
FrankieFixer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:15
big bro geek
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,731
Am I the only one who doesn't think it went over?
big bro geek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:15
Department_S
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Home Counties North
Posts: 3,336
We need in-ear technology to prevent commentators making a right Doyle of themselves in clear cut situations.
Department_S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:15
Ænima
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 34,106
The whole ball has to go over and one of the replay's showed that wasn't the case.
The angle of the camera can make things look a lot different. It's like in tennis with hawkeye- sometimes you'd swear a ball was on the line, then hawkeye shows it's 5 inches out! It's the angle the reply shows that can be confusing.
Ænima is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:15
BigFoot87
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,257
Camera angles have always been deceptive, that's why they went with goalline technology as opposed to a fourth official watching replays.
Agreed, but the initial verdict from GLT shouldn't have shown, hence the confusion.
BigFoot87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:15
jenzie
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: BUDDIETOWN
Posts: 20,385
and who cares how many "replays" of instances there are, the one that matters is the one that counts!
jenzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:17
Pink Knight
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 8,451
The whole ball has to go over and one of the replay's showed that wasn't the case.
The last replay showed that the keeper pushed it in.
Pink Knight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:17
FMKK
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 26,167
I don't see why the commentators were acting as if*there is some great controversy over the goal line tech. It was pretty obvious what was going on to anyone watching.
FMKK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:17
Fio Montoya
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,041
What an idiot.
Fio Montoya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:17
BigFoot87
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,257
Bottom line, GLT works, and France are 2-0 up.
BigFoot87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:17
Ænima
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 34,106
It made sense eventually, it was Pearce going into Robot Wars mode that made it seem chaotic.
I remember his commentary on that show. He was usually at least 5 minutes behind everyone else with what he was saying. He's really not the sharpest tool in the box
Ænima is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:18
C Horse
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 526
How many players need to be sent off to forfeit a match ?
You can continue with 7 - if one more goes, the match should be abandoned - I THINK one of the Sheffield teams went down to 7 a few years back.

It's a silly rule, because all you then need to do if you are down to 7 is deliberately get another one sent off (to your advantage).

Unless they have changed things ...
C Horse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:18
Jason C
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bexleyheath, SE London
Posts: 17,449
The French doing very well not to get unsettled in the face of all this Honduras provocation.

Again, the goal line technology worked fine but was displayed badly in that instance, because you followed the giving of the goal with a graphic that said 'No Goal' - the replay should have only started from the point where the keeper split the ball and it crossed the line.
Jason C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:18
Sattrega
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kingdom of Arnor
Posts: 78,227
Bottom line, GLT works, and France are 2-0 up.
Indeed.
Sattrega is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:18
Lisa.B
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: East Mids
Posts: 42,950
At this rate Honduras will be lucky to be able to field a full team for their final group match!
Lisa.B is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:18
mikeyddd
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,975
The whole ball has to go over and one of the replay's showed that wasn't the case.
I don't think it was a goal either
mikeyddd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:18
FrankieFixer
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 11,355
She looked like she had the plague
FrankieFixer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:18
Tassium
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: It's Grim
Posts: 24,405
I think they will be changing the software very soon...

---------
Prior to goal-line technology, imagine if the referee in a situation like that had first said "no goal" and then a second or two later said "Goal!"

They wouldn't be doing that again for sure.

Because while a computer may see such a thing as two events an actual human being would never do so. So any confusion was quite understandable.
Tassium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:18
Gort
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,053
The whole ball has to go over and one of the replay's showed that wasn't the case.
You're right, that replay didn't convince me at the time that the whole ball had crossed the line. Then what made it worse was that the technology showed a graphic with the ball easily behind the line with a lot of space to spare, more so than it seemed in that replay. I believe it's a goal, but it was damn closer than that technology showed.
Gort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2014, 21:19
celesti
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 15,844
Agreed, but the initial verdict from GLT shouldn't have shown, hence the confusion.
Absolutely, it's bewildering that the obvious 'NO GOAL' part was displayed at all.
celesti is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:22.