• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Doctor Who
Who cares!
Pull2Open
24-06-2014
Are their times, when someone throws in some unresolved plot line or event when you just think...well, Who cares?!?
doctor blue box
24-06-2014
Well I think for the most part, with the Moffat/11 era doing the whole oh well, who cares thing is the only way to get any enjoyment out the arcs. they certainly weren't tied neatly in a bow, which to me is still the case now, even though officially we've had the explanations.

Their are some things I genuinely haven't cared about though. For example, when everyone was going on about the ducks in the duck pond and rorys id badge, and the extra staircase at amys house. I was open to the idea that their could be something more to these things, but didn't really care either way if there was, whereas to some on here they seemed of monumental importance
CoalHillJanitor
24-06-2014
I thought this thread was going to be about some new Doctor Who-based charitable organisation.
emby2
24-06-2014
Originally Posted by CoalHillJanitor:
“I thought this thread was going to be about some new Doctor Who-based charitable organisation.”

Or a follow-up to 'Doctor in Distress'!
The War Doctor
24-06-2014
Originally Posted by Pull2Open:
“Are their times, when someone throws in some unresolved plot line or event when you just think...well, Who cares?!?”

As much as I hate it when bits of the plot don't make sense, sometimes less is better, as sometimes when the writers try to explain everything, it can make things even more confusing, and in some cases even spoil past/future episodes.

Seasons six and seven are full of plot holes, but the best example is probably the Christmas episode, MS's finale. I'd rather have set seasons six and seven aside, and forgotten about the unanswered questions than watch SM's attempt to "answer" them.

I probably would have enjoyed the finale a lot more if they'd given us a one-off adventure instead, better that than the horrible mess of an episode we got.
chuffnobbler
24-06-2014
Originally Posted by emby2:
“Or a follow-up to 'Doctor in Distress'! ”

Bring it back now, we won't take less.
CoalHillJanitor
24-06-2014
Oh yeah, I knew the name sounded familiar.
Pull2Open
24-06-2014
That's the first time I've seen that, id heard about it but haven't thought about it since the 80s.

What the hell were they thinking!?!?!
tiggerpooh
24-06-2014
Originally Posted by Pull2Open:
“Are their times, when someone throws in some unresolved plot line or event when you just think...well, Who cares?!?”

What an odd question to ask.
Pull2Open
24-06-2014
Originally Posted by tiggerpooh:
“What an odd question to ask. ”

why??
CoalHillJanitor
24-06-2014
Originally Posted by Pull2Open:
“That's the first time I've seen that, id heard about it but haven't thought about it since the 80s.

What the hell were they thinking!?!?!”

'Twas the age of the charity supergroup single. Band Aid, USA for Africa, Artists United Against Apartheid. Not that that made it a particularly good idea, though.
Michael_Eve
24-06-2014
Originally Posted by CoalHillJanitor:
“'Twas the age of the charity supergroup single. Band Aid, USA for Africa, Artists United Against Apartheid. Not that that made it a particularly good idea, though.”

Considering the context, No, it really didn't. I was a teenager at the time, and was massively into the show but....even at my most teenage-y "Damn. Love the show." this felt beyond crass!
Pull2Open
24-06-2014
Originally Posted by CoalHillJanitor:
“'Twas the age of the charity supergroup single. Band Aid, USA for Africa, Artists United Against Apartheid. Not that that made it a particularly good idea, though.”

Yep, remember them all well and understand the format...but...just....why?!?!?
CoalHillJanitor
24-06-2014
Originally Posted by Michael_Eve:
“Considering the context, No, it really didn't. I was a teenager at the time, and was massively into the show but....even at my most teenage-y "Damn. Love the show." this felt beyond crass!”

Yeah, this wasn't an issue like starvation. Everyone knew Colin Baker was still going to eat. (Especially in retrospect.) It's like an unintentional parody of the charity single which fails to realise that the point of the whole genre is speaking out for some vital issue of justice and humanity.
Michael_Eve
24-06-2014
Originally Posted by CoalHillJanitor:
“Yeah, this wasn't an issue like starvation. Everyone knew Colin Baker was still going to eat. (Especially in retrospect.) It's like an unintentional parody of the charity single which fails to realise that the point of the whole genre is speaking out for some vital issue of justice and humanity.”

Still, I had been wondering where Sally Thomsett had got to. Preferred Paula Willcox myself.

In fairness, I assume Colin doesn't look back on the whole debacle with great fondness either.

Sorry, this is going well OT!
The_Judge_
24-06-2014
Originally Posted by Pull2Open:
“Are their times, when someone throws in some unresolved plot line or event when you just think...well, Who cares?!?”

The girl in the shop who gave Jenna that number ....
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map