Originally Posted by Makosi's pants:
“Rumours that Uruguay may boycott their next match. Don't think they'll follow through with that but the hysteria of the anti-English defensivesness and ludicrous claims of photoshopping from some parts of the Uruguayian media make me wonder.....”
I actually think Uruguay, for their attitude and Ramirez's pathetic attempts to cover up Chiellini's wounds, should be expelled and, if they are still in Brazil, Italy be allowed to take their place in the last 16.
Chile were banned from the World Cup when their keeper faked injury to get a qualifier they were losing in Brazil abandoned. A flare landed several feet away, and the team doctor came along with some fake blood and the keeper carried off. TV evidence damned them, and the side were thrown out of the following competition.
I'm not saying ban Uruguay from 2018, but that precedent could have been used to expel them from this competition, as Suarez actions, and the Uruguayans defence of them, was far worse than the Chilean fiasco.
EDIT: Just read up on it, it wasn't fake blood, the keeper cut himself. But it was a lifetime ban for him, a 2-0 statutory loss and Chile banned from the NEXT WC.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roberto_Rojas
Using that as a precedent, I really don't think a lifetime ban for Suarez and a 2-0 win awarded to Italy would have been harsh at all, given it's his third offence, and his team were complicit in him not getting sent off, and also the FA has not admitted any responsibility for their player at all. I am surprised the Italians haven't put in an official protest to get this result annulled.
If that sounds harsh on Liverpool, order the Uruguayan FA to pay up the rest of his contract as well. If they refuse, then use the Chile precedent to threaten a 4 year ban.