|
||||||||
Belgium vs USA - BBC One 9pm KO |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#576 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 6,436
|
Quote:
Just remember when the worlds media, BBC/ITV included were falling over themselves declaring Spain the greatest international team of all time in the postmatch discussion of their 4-0 win against Italy in euro 2012.
I bumped that thread which was started on here two years ago, would they all agree with that now? Despite being the lowest scoring WC winners ever, maybe they're just one of the best instead? What about FC Barcelona? Sky and the worlds media were self declaring them the greatest club side ever 2009-2012, what happened to that? I argued they had to retain the champions league, doing so would mean they have done something no one else had done, but no they were the greatest side then even before that. They failed to retain the CL and so Sky have not pushed that opinion since, maybe they should have waited first? For some reason the media seem to be intent on telling us that we are constantly witnessing the greatest of things. The hype around sportsmen beggars belief at times. The Spain team was a great team, but the greatest? There's no way of knowing and how do you measure this greatness anyway? The same can be said of the Barcelona side. They were undoubtedly a very good team, but how can anyone say they are the greatest? What is the criteria? Every generation or era has it's own great team, but trying to compare them to past teams when there is no means by which to do so is futile really. They are all great in their own way and should simply stand side by side in the history books as great teams of their time. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#577 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,575
|
Quote:
Well ... I'm American, so here goes nothing:
-- Proud of the team, proud of the fightback, proud of the players, proud of Klinsmann for sticking to his guns (his controversial picks of Brooks and Green both scored and Yedlin assisted on a goal in the Portugal game), and plenty of hope now for the next cycle. -- That said, Howard (combined with Belgium's odd refusal to shoot high and on frame) made this performance seem a lot better than it was. Belgium tore the US apart and a 2-1 scoreline 100% flatters us. They get picked to pieces too easily and there's no depth defensively or up front. Altidore sucks and I don't get why we pretended to miss him. Honestly, 1-0 against Germany probably is kind to us, too. -- Bradley was abysmal this tournament and Zusi was awful today. -- Love Yedlin going forward and his speed is his best asset along with his crosses. He'll learn soon enough to be a better defender. -- Much of the popularity boom you're seeing about the sport is true, but you have to realize a lot of it is just the fact that as a "patriotic" country we will watch the World Cup of Dice if we're involved because anything USA will spark interest. MLS, a league which has inexplicably chosen to play matches during this World Cup, will not experience a boom in interest because by the time its August the NFL season is almost underway and the Premier League routinely outdraws MLS EVEN CONSIDERING time difference. -- This Belgium team is so freaking talented. All the credit to them for the win. |
|
|
|
|
|
#578 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,215
|
Quote:
The Spain team was a great team, but the greatest? There's no way of knowing and how do you measure this greatness anyway?
Working as a pundit on the BBC's Match of the Day broadcast, Shearer said: "This team is the best ever. "We mention the Brazil sides with Pele but this is absolutely unbelievable what they have achieved." http://www.sportsmole.co.uk/football...ver_32835.html Spain are amongst the greatest teams for sure, however Alan Shearer also just declared this WC as the greatest ever. Do these pundits have the tendancy to go completely over the top sometimes in the heat of the moment? You bet. However if I was getting an expenses paid holiday staying in 5 star hotels outside the copacabana just so I could talk about football I probably would be too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#579 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,936
|
That Spain side was a great side though. To the extent that it seems odd not to see them in the later stages of a tournament and having to pick out another team as a likely winner.
Perhaps the 2012 punditry comments during the Euros were made in the heat of the moment. However Spain had completely destroyed the second best team at the competition, and with flair.....something they received much criticism for lacking earlier in the same tournament. 'Greatest' may be subjective, but the 2011 Champions League final performance of Barcelona against Manchester United was one of the most accomplished and one sided I have seen in my lifetime. |
|
|
|
|
|
#580 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,215
|
Quote:
That Spain side was a great side though. To the extent that it seems odd not to see them in the later stages of a tournament and having to pick out another team as a likely winner.
I have no problem if Alan Shearer saying what he said, its his opinion, but would he say that now about them? Will he say in 10 years time this is definitively the best ever world cup? Maybe, maybe not. ITV/Sky were telling us practically every weeknight of Champions league football that Guardiolas Barca side were the greatest side the grace the earth back then, I don't find people saying that so much now and their not commonly refered to as the "greatest ever" as they once were. Perhaps one of the greatest rather than the greatest. Failing to retain the CL was a huge blow IMO. |
|
|
|
|
|
#581 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,424
|
Confirmation from the official FIFA stats today that Chris Wondolowski was NOT flagged offside for his miss night - the assistant referee was merely flagging for a goal kick, but with Wondolowski shooting from just outside the 6 yard box it appeared as though offside had been the decision - especially if you are a BBC pundit where knowledge of the laws of the game is optional it would seem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#582 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 76,821
|
Quote:
Had red button HD for the picture + radio 5 commentary. Superb, just superb. Pity ITV can't give us another option, say a *no commentator* option.
It's a real bummer when the games are on ITV.........then I tend to have the sound down on the telly with my radio on R5 but of course you then get the out of sync commentary......... What a fantastic game last night..........huge credit to both teams |
|
|
|
|
|
#583 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 7,916
|
Missed around 20 mins of the middle of the second half, but did enjoy what I saw. The better team did win in the end, if it wasnt for Howard, it could have been an American football score. He did play really well, as did Yedlin.
Belgium havent really played well all tournament, and have made it to the quarters. They have some quality players, that havent yet fired. I dont think they will get past Argentina though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#584 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,059
|
Never been so disappointed as a neutral to see a USA team lose. Don't agree that Bradley was abysmal. Yedlin was a revelation and Beasley tireless.
America just not clinical enough in front of goal. The kind of game that it's all about. No cheating and end to end stuff. No bus parking bore. Well played USA. |
|
|
|
|
|
#585 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,816
|
At least Man United fans can take heart knowing that Marouane Fellaini is just as bad for Belgium as he is for them. Be interesting to see if Wilmots sticks by him as he looked a certainty to be one of the first players subbed yet somehow managed to play 120 minutes.
The only way he could be useful is if you were a goal down with 20 minutes to play and wanted a target man to hit but Belgium already have one or two of those type players. What a spectacular fall from grace this guy has had in the last 12 months. |
|
|
|
|
|
#586 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dagenham Essex UK
Posts: 9,715
|
Quote:
Never been so disappointed as a neutral to see a USA team lose. Don't agree that Bradley was abysmal. Yedlin was a revelation and Beasley tireless.
America just not clinical enough in front of goal. The kind of game that it's all about. No cheating and end to end stuff. No bus parking bore. Well played USA. Well said. USA may have their weak areas, but for all that, it was an entertaining game. Well done JK, and USA. |
|
|
|
|
|
#587 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 11,355
|
Quote:
Just remember when the worlds media, BBC/ITV included were falling over themselves declaring Spain the greatest international team of all time in the postmatch discussion of their 4-0 win against Italy in euro 2012.
I bumped that thread which was started on here two years ago, would they all agree with that now? Despite being the lowest scoring WC winners ever, maybe they're just one of the best instead? What about FC Barcelona? Sky and the worlds media were self declaring them the greatest club side ever 2009-2012, what happened to that? I argued they had to retain the champions league, doing so would mean they have done something no one else had done, but no they were the greatest side then even before that. They failed to retain the CL and so Sky have not pushed that opinion since, maybe they should have waited first? |
|
|
|
|
|
#588 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Derby
Posts: 27,584
|
Quote:
If you were around at the time, the Belgium/Russia (not sure if it was last 16 or QF) in 1986 was a fantastic game where the pitch looked twice the size as normal and each team had 15 attackers and 5 defenders....brilliantly comentated on by the ITV commentator who normally worked the Anglia region...Gerry Harrison??
I think last night, for the first time, Belgium showed up in this tournament. They look good enough to match the 1986 side and make the semis. |
|
|
|
|
#589 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 6,436
|
Quote:
Never been so disappointed as a neutral to see a USA team lose. Don't agree that Bradley was abysmal. Yedlin was a revelation and Beasley tireless.
America just not clinical enough in front of goal. The kind of game that it's all about. No cheating and end to end stuff. No bus parking bore. Well played USA. The USA are getting a lot of credit, but let's not forget the part Belgium played in that. Even when they were ahead with only a couple of minutes left they didn't waste time. They had the opportunity to just run the ball to the corner flag and eat up a few seconds on several occasions, but they chose to keep attacking instead. It was a fantastic game played with a good spirit. If Yedlin doesn't attract interest from some very big clubs after that performance I will be amazed. He looked superb. |
|
|
|
|
|
#590 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,215
|
Quote:
Barcelona were the greatest club side ever and Spain would probably be the best international side ever seen.
I argued that if Spain won this tournament, retaining the WC, they would certainly be, but the manner in which they crashed out, and their style of play will suggest, that they were one of the best international sides, not the definitive best, that they certainly could/would have been. |
|
|
|
|
|
#591 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,105
|
Quote:
At least Man United fans can take heart knowing that Marouane Fellaini is just as bad for Belgium as he is for them. Be interesting to see if Wilmots sticks by him as he looked a certainty to be one of the first players subbed yet somehow managed to play 120 minutes.
The only way he could be useful is if you were a goal down with 20 minutes to play and wanted a target man to hit but Belgium already have one or two of those type players. What a spectacular fall from grace this guy has had in the last 12 months. |
|
|
|
|
|
#592 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 11,355
|
Quote:
Thats your opinion but from my experiances reading the media thats nowhere near universally accepted. Barcelona didn't retain the CL, I supported them btw but messing up that semi against Chelsea 2012 who were 6th in the prem at the time was a killer. Losing 7-0 on aggregate to Bayern the following year closed the door on them.
I argued that if Spain won this tournament, retaining the WC, they would certainly be, but the manner in which they crashed out, and their style of play will suggest, that they were one of the best international sides, not the definitive best, that they certainly could/would have been. |
|
|
|
|
|
#593 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,215
|
Quote:
Barcelona 2008-2011 were probably the greatest club side of all time. It's difficult to even argue against them. Like Spain they won it all and their style dominated opponents. Messi going 60 games and 73 goals is ridiculous. Not retaining the champions league doesn't mean anything, it's a cup competition where anything can happen.
I could see many people make the case for Real Madrid in 1998-2002, and I don't see how Barcelona were much better than them. They could be argued as better, but its not so clear cut? Retaining the competition or at least winning it more than anyone else in a number of years is hugely important to their legacy, and for me therefore they don't stand out historically any more than a lot of other sides in the past 10 or 20 years. The acid test for Barcelona is how many people are saying they're the greatest ever in 5-10+ years time. If people still call them the greatest in years to come, then fair enough, but I don't think many people will. |
|
|
|
|
|
#594 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 11,355
|
Quote:
Its very easy to argue against them. I would suggest a lot of Barcelona's plaudits were due to their style of play rather than their effectiveness. Mourinho's Real Madrid even matched their points record total in la liga in 2012, a lot teams matched many of their statistics.
I could see many people make the case for Real Madrid in 1998-2002, and I don't see how Barcelona were much better than them. They could be argued as better, but its not so clear cut? Retaining the competition or at least winning it more than anyone else in a number of years is hugely important to their legacy, and for me therefore they don't stand out historically any more than a lot of other sides in the past 10 or 20 years. The acid test for Barcelona is how many people are saying they're the greatest ever in 5-10+ years time. If people still call them the greatest in years to come, then fair enough, but I don't think many people will. |
|
|
|
|
|
#595 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,215
|
Quote:
Real Madrid 1998-2002 were nowhere near that Barcelona team. A lot of Barcelona players were part of the Spanish teams world cup success too. That Barcelona team will be remembered for a long, long time given they have probably the best player to ever play the game in Lionel Messi still playing and scoring for them.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:14.



