DS Forums

 
 

Rob coronation street


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28-06-2014, 09:34
sweetie939
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 373

Does anyone else find it odd that the police are not even questioning him or considering him to be in the frame? They can tell a lot by body language and the way someone acts
sweetie939 is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 28-06-2014, 09:58
Maria_Robinson
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,933
Stevie Wonder could see how shifty he is acting with all the eye darting and face pulling but he could have I DUN IT tattoed across his forehead and the dozy soap coppers wouldnt even notice, too busy making smart alec remarks and being incrediblly stupid. This Rob and Peter business is beginning to drag on now.
Maria_Robinson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-06-2014, 10:56
Lady Voldemort
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: here
Posts: 4,814
I think Rob has almost convinced himself that Peter is the killer now. Like he's somehow blocking what he has done out of his head.
Lady Voldemort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-06-2014, 11:39
purple bunny
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,853
It's called bad acting, production & writing. Yawn.
purple bunny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-06-2014, 12:53
Jack_Clinton
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 951
In the polices eyes, Rob has no motive to kill Tina.

What has surprised me though is Tracy. She has not asked him where he was that night.

He may be found out soon or Tracy/Peter framed. For anyone watching last night would have seen Deirdre find Tina's jewellery in the back yard, and Peter touched it in the kitchen. I'm thinking it may be handed into Tracy's shop. Steph recognises it when she comes in. Rob is none the wiser as he is working at the factory. The story drags out further as Peter is arrested as his fingerprints are on the jewellery.
Jack_Clinton is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28-06-2014, 13:17
Tt88
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 6,203
In the polices eyes, Rob has no motive to kill Tina.

What has surprised me though is Tracy. She has not asked him where he was that night.

He may be found out soon or Tracy/Peter framed. For anyone watching last night would have seen Deirdre find Tina's jewellery in the back yard, and Peter touched it in the kitchen. I'm thinking it may be handed into Tracy's shop. Steph recognises it when she comes in. Rob is none the wiser as he is working at the factory. The story drags out further as Peter is arrested as his fingerprints are on the jewellery.
I like it. Peter stitched up by eccles
Tt88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-06-2014, 15:45
Lucy Lou
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 7,903
I like it. Peter stitched up by eccles
Eccles the snitch!

I am finding Rob quite annoying now, he seems to blame Peter for Tina's murder indirectly because of the affair (if the affair hadn't happened the murder wouldn't either) and I think that is how he justifies his Peter- blame.
Lucy Lou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-06-2014, 15:46
sw2963
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,261
Terrible actor
sw2963 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 29-06-2014, 09:03
ME1234567
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 5,037
I think Rob has almost convinced himself that Peter is the killer now. Like he's somehow blocking what he has done out of his head.
I think so too.
ME1234567 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-06-2014, 11:58
sam_gee
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 11,075
The police asked Carla if there was anyone who could have had it in for Tina out of loyalty to her, so I'm surprised Rob hasn't even been considered as a suspect by them, and that Carla didn't think of him when the police asked the question.

The way Rob has been behaving is so suspicious - he actually apologised to Tina's mother for her death and offered her money - even though she didn't know him from Adam. Tracey has noticed there is something up with him - how long before she remembers he wasn't with her at the time of the murder and starts wondering where he really was?
sam_gee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-06-2014, 12:17
scone
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 13,749
I disagree
scone is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 29-06-2014, 13:18
Meanaunty
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 229
I just hope that if this was a real situation, everyone would be interviewed, haven't they heard of house to house in Corrie?! Of course they should be interviewing Rob they shouldn't need to be told he has a motive. It's obvious that he hates Peter and Carla being his sister gives him the motive or at least merits him being questioned first.

Why would Peter kill Tina when he already confessed to Carla? If he killed her to keep her quiet it was a sure way of making everything come out! That should be enough to put him in the clear to me.

I would then look around at the bit players, we have a sister of the accused who has already murdered, ok I know she got her conviction quashed on a technicality but wouldn't she merit closer watching? Especially as she is partner of the guy going around in a very dodgy manner!

They may have had a brief chat with them both at the start but they're clearly getting no where with Peter and Carla so they should start again, but it's soap cops, so they won't! Sigh....
Meanaunty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-06-2014, 13:28
barlowconnor
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Leeds
Posts: 15,940
It's not fair on Peter, he's getting all the blame,Rob should be questioned.
barlowconnor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-06-2014, 13:47
Lizzie Brookes
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 13,318
In the polices eyes, Rob has no motive to kill Tina.

What has surprised me though is Tracy. She has not asked him where he was that night.

He may be found out soon or Tracy/Peter framed. For anyone watching last night would have seen Deirdre find Tina's jewellery in the back yard, and Peter touched it in the kitchen. I'm thinking it may be handed into Tracy's shop. Steph recognises it when she comes in. Rob is none the wiser as he is working at the factory. The story drags out further as Peter is arrested as his fingerprints are on the jewellery.
Exactly - even if the police notice Rob is acting shifty, they can't do anything until they establish a motive for him. Of course there are some cases where murderers kill without motive because they're not right in the head but Rob is not one of those and even the police will know that.
Lizzie Brookes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-06-2014, 20:38
Old Man 43
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,583
Exactly - even if the police notice Rob is acting shifty, they can't do anything until they establish a motive for him. Of course there are some cases where murderers kill without motive because they're not right in the head but Rob is not one of those and even the police will know that.
Also they did interview him but as Tracey gave him an alibi there is no reason to suspect him.

What I would like to see happen is that Peter is found not guilty and someone else is accused (not Carla or Tracey).

Rob then has to decide whether to confess or risk an innocent person (that he does not hate) being sent to Prison.
Old Man 43 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:22.