Once again the 2 at the top picked PAR every player..Whats the point of bothering
dean in 3rd only had 9 and i only picked 7 in 4th. (i have only gone 7 again in the 2nd round)
The scoring is flawed because there's no better rewards for going for more riskier scores.
If you predict anything from -6 to -2 your only getting 1pt more than going for -1 to +3 if correct.
The only way forward is change the scoring system or limit the number of predictions you can do with one score.
Say only 20% of the list as an example.