|
||||||||
O2 Germany Deal Gets Approved |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,249
|
O2 Germany Deal Gets Approved
After much debate the eu commission has approved the merger of E-Plus and O2 Germany with the following conditions they must divest some spectrum and mobile capacity.
The conditions were expected honestly and unless they have to give up a ton of spectrum they likely got off likely. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 12,488
|
Quote:
After much debate the eu commission has approved the merger of E-Plus and O2 Germany with the following conditions they must divest some spectrum and mobile capacity.
The conditions were expected honestly and unless they have to give up a ton of spectrum they likely got off likely. It sounded like they will have to support several MVNO services, which probably means Spectrum plus towers, antennas, base stations, power, back-haul and some management systems, etc, etc. I'm sure they'll find a way to charge for this stuff, but the German regulator will be watching closely as I understand they wanted the deal blocked but was overruled by the EU. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,662
|
Actually they won't necessarily have to give up spectrum - just offer it either to a new network or one of the MVNOs that will be taking network capacity from them (they might decide not to buy it).
It is similar to the Ireland decision. Basically before they can proceed they have to commit to sell to between 1 - 3 MVNOs a fixed amount of network capacity (it terms of bitstream access, not spectrum or network equipment). Because the MVNO has to pay a fixed amount for the capacity rather than a variable amount based on usage, the thinking is that they will have a big incentive to offer lower prices to fill it as quickly as possible. This keeps downward pressure on prices in the market. Later on the MVNOs have the option to buy some spectrum (if it hasn't already been sold) and so turn themselves into a proper network. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,249
|
Quote:
From the version I read, it sounds like more than just spectrum.
It sounded like they will have to support several MVNO services, which probably means Spectrum plus towers, antennas, base stations, power, back-haul and some management systems, etc, etc. I'm sure they'll find a way to charge for this stuff, but the German regulator will be watching closely as I understand they wanted the deal blocked but was overruled by the EU. Quote:
Actually they won't necessarily have to give up spectrum - just offer it either to a new network or one of the MVNOs that will be taking network capacity from them (they might decide not to buy it).
It is similar to the Ireland decision. Basically before they can proceed they have to commit to sell to between 1 - 3 MVNOs a fixed amount of network capacity (it terms of bitstream access, not spectrum or network equipment). Because the MVNO has to pay a fixed amount for the capacity rather than a variable amount based on usage, the thinking is that they will have a big incentive to offer lower prices to fill it as quickly as possible. This keeps downward pressure on prices in the market. Later on the MVNOs have the option to buy some spectrum (if it hasn't already been sold) and so turn themselves into a proper network. Though it might even be hard to find a MVNO who wants to become a MNO wouldn't be cheap to do would have to start of with VoLTE or some sort of deal like BT is going have with EE. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: North West
Posts: 4,885
|
Going forward I doubt this will have any impact on the arrangements in blighty. Some members of this forum are obsessed that the same will happen here. As it stands 4 players seems to be the perfect medium.
Though what I do find interesting is where Telefonica has found the money to fund this move given they up to the eye balls in debt? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,249
|
Quote:
Going forward I doubt this will have any impact on the arrangements in blighty. Some members of this forum are obsessed that the same will happen here. As it stands 4 players seems to be the perfect medium.
Though what I do find interesting is where Telefonica has found the money to fund this move given they up to the eye balls in debt? Haha I wonder where they found the money as well they must be over 50 billion in debt at the moment. Maybe down the back of the CEO's Couch. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,662
|
Quote:
Going forward I doubt this will have any impact on the arrangements in blighty. Some members of this forum are obsessed that the same will happen here. As it stands 4 players seems to be the perfect medium.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,249
|
Quote:
Hardly perfect for the players though. None of them are happy with the current situation here where margins are too low. And the impact of the Germany decision is not that everyone has to go out and copy it but rather it removes what was previously thought to be a barrier i.e. for the big markets at least, 4 main players down to 3 would be blocked on competition grounds. Now we know that is no longer a barrier. Removing one barrier doesn't mean it will happen, it just makes it more likely than before. Ofcom might not want it but it's not their call. For any combination of the UK networks, it would be an EC decision applying EU competition law.
Completely agree with you though not sure if you interested Orange France have decided they are going be evaluating decision on buying Bouygues been put on a bit of a back burner. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,662
|
Quote:
Haha also kind of shows that O2 might want sell O2 UK even more with them increasing there debt lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,662
|
Quote:
Completely agree with you though not sure if you interested Orange France have decided they are going be evaluating decision on buying Bouygues been put on a bit of a back burner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,249
|
Quote:
There has been a bit of (largely unsubstantiated) talk going around over the last couple of days of vodafone + orange. Could just be silly season mind so perhaps ignore (for now).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: North West
Posts: 4,885
|
Quote:
Technically it will be 5 players in the British Wireless Market come next year as BT will be using it's spectrum which will allow it to be called a MNO as well even though they will be using EE for 2G and 3G pretty much what Three did with O2 and 2G. Trials for that begin very soon if anyone is interested. Imagine they will want rollout VoLTE as soon as they could so they wouldn't have to rely on EE as much.
Haha I wonder where they found the money as well they must be over 50 billion in debt at the moment. Maybe down the back of the CEO's Couch. Regarding the agreement with EE I understand it to be a fixed, unlike some other MNVOs where its based on usage. BT seems to be waving its willy around with that lovely chunk of prime 2600 they got. Telefonica is playing this rather strange....I suppose given O2 UK is easily their prize asset they wouldn't want to put it at risk. Quote:
Hardly perfect for the players though. None of them are happy with the current situation here where margins are too low. And the impact of the Germany decision is not that everyone has to go out and copy it but rather it removes what was previously thought to be a barrier i.e. for the big markets at least, 4 main players down to 3 would be blocked on competition grounds. Now we know that is no longer a barrier. Removing one barrier doesn't mean it will happen, it just makes it more likely than before. Ofcom might not want it but it's not their call. For any combination of the UK networks, it would be an EC decision applying EU competition law.
As for any combination of UK networks it isn't necessarily an EC decision, if the merger is largely domestic related they butt out...the only reason they got involved in the EE merger was down to the fact both parent companies were the state incumbents in their home markets. That was a matter of interest at European level, same applied to this recent merger. Telefonica is the largest provider in the Iberian peninsula if I am not mistaken. Them merging and suddenly becoming the largest in Germany is a matter of European interest. For arguements sake say Three want to buy O2 UK, because Three is not the dominant provider (as far I know) in any European market the EC would not get involved it would be left to OFCOM and the Competition and Markets Authority. Most takeovers are left to dormestic regulators as it doesn't affect European competiton. The Commission is not the final arbiter for mergers in any country, they get involved in a limited set of circumstances. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,662
|
Quote:
I would agree with you if margins were thin but they aren't, there has been a substantial increase in monthly costs for people taking up expensive smartphones and 4G. The only phone type where margins are thin is on iPhone related products, everything else the Networks do a bit of willy waving and get massive discounts. Quote:
As for any combination of UK networks it isn't necessarily an EC decision, if the merger is largely domestic related they butt out...the only reason they got involved in the EE merger was down to the fact both parent companies were the state incumbents in their home markets. That was a matter of interest at European level, same applied to this recent merger. Telefonica is the largest provider in the Iberian peninsula if I am not mistaken. Them merging and suddenly becoming the largest in Germany is a matter of European interest. For arguements sake say Three want to buy O2 UK, because Three is not the dominant provider (as far I know) in any European market the EC would not get involved it would be left to OFCOM and the Competition and Markets Authority. Most takeovers are left to dormestic regulators as it doesn't affect European competiton. Sorry but that is wrong. The Commission would rule on mergers where there are cross border aspects (and can be referred to them even if they don't initially take it on). You say 3UK + O2 UK wouldn't involve the EC. But that's exactly what happened in Ireland where the EC was the decision maker on Three buying O2 there. Comreg, the Irish regulator even said they weren't happy with all aspects of the decison but accepted the EC was the correct authority for it.The Commission is not the final arbiter for mergers in any country, they get involved in a limited set of circumstances. You can't have a UK network combination without a European cross border impact. e.g. Say I'm a network in France and I want to offer my customers roaming in the UK access. Currently I can negotiate and play off Vodafone, O2, Three, or EE to get the best deal. If Three bought O2 then I'm weaker as I now only have 3 choices and so probably won't get as good a deal. If this was ruled by a UK regulator then they probably wouldn't consider the impact on the French network. Therefore it gets ruled on by the EC to properly consider cross border aspects of which there would be a multitude to consider. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,662
|
Quote:
Ah I haven't heard of that thanks for information that would certainly be interesting if a partnership of some sort went ahead between the two companies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,249
|
Quote:
Think it was more along the lines of vodafone buying orange. Not sure where that would leave EE or what the French Government would think. In actual fact there isn't too much overlap between them (Spain, Romania, UK perhaps...).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: North West
Posts: 4,885
|
Quote:
For a long time, relative to the others the UK has been one of the most competitive mobile markets in Europe with lower prices and consequently lower margins for the operators than most comparable markets. Whilst prices have started to fall and competition increase in other countries, it is a more recent thing. The factors you mention apply to all countries but when it's all added up, margins in the UK have mostly been far lower than other comparable countries. Why do you think that is if it's not due to a more competitive environment?
Sorry but that is wrong. The Commission would rule on mergers where there are cross border aspects (and can be referred to them even if they don't initially take it on). You say 3UK + O2 UK wouldn't involve the EC. But that's exactly what happened in Ireland where the EC was the decision maker on Three buying O2 there. Comreg, the Irish regulator even said they weren't happy with all aspects of the decison but accepted the EC was the correct authority for it. You can't have a UK network combination without a European cross border impact. e.g. Say I'm a network in France and I want to offer my customers roaming in the UK access. Currently I can negotiate and play off Vodafone, O2, Three, or EE to get the best deal. If Three bought O2 then I'm weaker as I now only have 3 choices and so probably won't get as good a deal. If this was ruled by a UK regulator then they probably wouldn't consider the impact on the French network. Therefore it gets ruled on by the EC to properly consider cross border aspects of which there would be a multitude to consider.
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21.


